Anonymous wrote:OP. Yes, we are an active family - lots of trips, incl international travel, skiing, surfing, lots of theatre, after-school activities etc. - and that is a big factor in a decision against a third. However, I like at least a 3yr age gap so I can enjoy each child individually and give them my proper time and attention. I think that three kids under 3 or 4, even under 5, is a big blur in the young years to a lot of my friends, although with proper help they manage. I would hire help for the the youngest child. I feel like the older ones would need me more, and the needs of 1-4 yr olds can be met by any competent nanny (we are fortunate to have had one). I am even comfortable with leaving a young child with a nanny while we travel, because he/she will neither remember that, nor would they really miss out on active hiking/skiing/European trips, in which they cannot meaningfully participate. Lastly, DH and I are comfortable to divide and conquer as needed, since we do it with the 2 we've got anyway.
To the poster who said that I should not have more children because we never consider a third: we are all allowed to change our minds based on new information, no? I never imagined how much I'd enjoy being a mother. Despite having had a big career, lots of travel, going out to events and dinners, friends, hobbies etc prior to kids, I now find myself in a position where none of that matters to me as much as my kids, and none of it brings me as much joy as spending time with them, even in the more boring baby and toddler years. Hence those new feelings and thoughts about a third. Yes, volunteering, helping out those in need, fostering etc. are fulfilling, and I do a bit of that, however I am allowed to value time with my kids more than any of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend whose 3rd had severe special needs snapped me out of this pretty fast. Yes, I have other friends with healthy 3rd babies. But she went from having 2 healthy, developmentally normal kids to having a VERY intensely disabled kid too. It is not the type of hard that got better, it will be forever. Obviously she loves her 3rd child, but she's been pretty frank that she wishes she'd stopped at 2.
NP. Was this something that could have been sreened for during pregnancy? I would terminate if serious anormalities were detected, and would do CVS/amnio if AMA, so this gives me somewhat of a peace of mind.
Anonymous wrote:My friend whose 3rd had severe special needs snapped me out of this pretty fast. Yes, I have other friends with healthy 3rd babies. But she went from having 2 healthy, developmentally normal kids to having a VERY intensely disabled kid too. It is not the type of hard that got better, it will be forever. Obviously she loves her 3rd child, but she's been pretty frank that she wishes she'd stopped at 2.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP. Yes, we are an active family - lots of trips, incl international travel, skiing, surfing, lots of theatre, after-school activities etc. - and that is a big factor in a decision against a third. However, I like at least a 3yr age gap so I can enjoy each child individually and give them my proper time and attention. I think that three kids under 3 or 4, even under 5, is a big blur in the young years to a lot of my friends, although with proper help they manage. I would hire help for the the youngest child. I feel like the older ones would need me more, and the needs of 1-4 yr olds can be met by any competent nanny (we are fortunate to have had one). I am even comfortable with leaving a young child with a nanny while we travel, because he/she will neither remember that, nor would they really miss out on active hiking/skiing/European trips, in which they cannot meaningfully participate. Lastly, DH and I are comfortable to divide and conquer as needed, since we do it with the 2 we've got anyway.
To the poster who said that I should not have more children because we never consider a third: we are all allowed to change our minds based on new information, no? I never imagined how much I'd enjoy being a mother. Despite having had a big career, lots of travel, going out to events and dinners, friends, hobbies etc prior to kids, I now find myself in a position where none of that matters to me as much as my kids, and none of it brings me as much joy as spending time with them, even in the more boring baby and toddler years. Hence those new feelings and thoughts about a third. Yes, volunteering, helping out those in need, fostering etc. are fulfilling, and I do a bit of that, however I am allowed to value time with my kids more than any of it.
Me me me
'Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Note the SAHMs saying they “needed” a third. Hmmm.
I didn’t note anyone saying anything even close to that. I think you are projecting.
A number of posters have strongly implied that (04:59) and people are even suggesting tricking her husband into having another one. Gross.
How is that related to being a SAHM? Tricking someone to get pregnant is gross no matter the circumstances.
OP and 04:59 both stay home. You've never heard of SAHMs wanting more kids so they have an excuse to continue not working? Open your eyes, honey.
Anonymous wrote:My kids were 5 and 7 when my third was born. I absolutely love the age gap. Older kids were in kindergarten and 2nd grade. I get quality time with the youngest while older ones are in school all day. In the afternoons, I focus on the big kids. DH and I tag team on weekends. We did that when we had only 2 kids as well.
I had my third when I was 38. DH was not fully on board. We were both worried about health risks. Our third is perfect and completes our family. However, if something went wrong, I’m fairly certain DH would be resentful because I was the one who pushed for the third he didn’t want. He would have been totally fine with the 2.
Anonymous wrote:We go back and forth about wanting a third. Mine are 3 and 6. I'm 39. My husband does not want a third, but I think that if I told him that it was important to me, he would discuss it. Two months ago we had a pregnancy scare-- I was late-- and I FREAKED out. I thought about how our life would become so difficult, again, how my relationship with my husband would struggle under the additional stress, how I had no desire to pump or breastfeed again, and a million other things.
I wasn't pregnant, but I was shocked by how reassuring that experience was. I realize not everyone would feel this way, but it was a useful "tool" for me.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's great that you want a third. Ignore the bitter naysayers, DCUM can be very anti-natalist. You don't want to pressure your husband, but you also don't want to resent him. Can you keep talking about it with him and tell him that he is your #1 priority but also how you are feeling? Are there things you can agree on that would help with logistics? Childcare, more help etc? Also having older kids will make it so different, not long before your oldest can babysit which makes it so much easier to have flexibility. But I think maybe you need to probe deeper as to why your husband isn't thrilled and see if there is something that could be done. Perhaps he is enjoying having more time with you and worries a new baby would take that away...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP. Yes, we are an active family - lots of trips, incl international travel, skiing, surfing, lots of theatre, after-school activities etc. - and that is a big factor in a decision against a third. However, I like at least a 3yr age gap so I can enjoy each child individually and give them my proper time and attention. I think that three kids under 3 or 4, even under 5, is a big blur in the young years to a lot of my friends, although with proper help they manage. I would hire help for the the youngest child. I feel like the older ones would need me more, and the needs of 1-4 yr olds can be met by any competent nanny (we are fortunate to have had one). I am even comfortable with leaving a young child with a nanny while we travel, because he/she will neither remember that, nor would they really miss out on active hiking/skiing/European trips, in which they cannot meaningfully participate. Lastly, DH and I are comfortable to divide and conquer as needed, since we do it with the 2 we've got anyway.
To the poster who said that I should not have more children because we never consider a third: we are all allowed to change our minds based on new information, no? I never imagined how much I'd enjoy being a mother. Despite having had a big career, lots of travel, going out to events and dinners, friends, hobbies etc prior to kids, I now find myself in a position where none of that matters to me as much as my kids, and none of it brings me as much joy as spending time with them, even in the more boring baby and toddler years. Hence those new feelings and thoughts about a third. Yes, volunteering, helping out those in need, fostering etc. are fulfilling, and I do a bit of that, however I am allowed to value time with my kids more than any of it.
Me me me
Anonymous wrote:OP. Yes, we are an active family - lots of trips, incl international travel, skiing, surfing, lots of theatre, after-school activities etc. - and that is a big factor in a decision against a third. However, I like at least a 3yr age gap so I can enjoy each child individually and give them my proper time and attention. I think that three kids under 3 or 4, even under 5, is a big blur in the young years to a lot of my friends, although with proper help they manage. I would hire help for the the youngest child. I feel like the older ones would need me more, and the needs of 1-4 yr olds can be met by any competent nanny (we are fortunate to have had one). I am even comfortable with leaving a young child with a nanny while we travel, because he/she will neither remember that, nor would they really miss out on active hiking/skiing/European trips, in which they cannot meaningfully participate. Lastly, DH and I are comfortable to divide and conquer as needed, since we do it with the 2 we've got anyway.
To the poster who said that I should not have more children because we never consider a third: we are all allowed to change our minds based on new information, no? I never imagined how much I'd enjoy being a mother. Despite having had a big career, lots of travel, going out to events and dinners, friends, hobbies etc prior to kids, I now find myself in a position where none of that matters to me as much as my kids, and none of it brings me as much joy as spending time with them, even in the more boring baby and toddler years. Hence those new feelings and thoughts about a third. Yes, volunteering, helping out those in need, fostering etc. are fulfilling, and I do a bit of that, however I am allowed to value time with my kids more than any of it.