Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: BErnie scares me.

The Russians mentioned him and say to help him win. That and his trip to Moscow make me suspicious of him.

Reality problems: you have them!

No, that happened. Russia helped Bernie, too, and he hired Tad Devine who worked with Paul Manafort (though even as a Bernie hater I haven’t seen any evidence that he coordinated with Russia like the GOP did). He did also honeymoon in Moscow for his second marriage, I believe. These things happened. DP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: BErnie scares me.

The Russians mentioned him and say to help him win. That and his trip to Moscow make me suspicious of him.

Reality problems: you have them!

Anonymous wrote: BErnie scares me.

The Russians mentioned him and say to help him win. That and his trip to Moscow make me suspicious of him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is nobody even mildly curious about why the audio was released?

Did Elizabeth Warren request it be released? Bernie?

Or, was CNN hoping to try to make Bernie look bad, again? And, if you don't think they were biased against Bernie during the debate, you weren't paying attention.

Why is it even a question? Based on the line of questioning on this issue by CNN, CNN was pretty much a part of Warren's campaign. CNN accused Bernie of saying that a woman can't be president, and after Bernie denied it, directly asked Warren how she felt that Bernie said this, simply assuming that Bernie had said this and essentially calling Bernie a liar. I am pretty sure that Warren planned it ahead of time with CNN that she would be confronting Bernie after the debate, and that CNN should catch the audio and release it. Bernie was obviously caught off guard by the confrontation and urged Warren to discuss it at another time. It's clear Warren wanted to press the issue with CNN's help and CNN was eager to oblige.

Warren is a vile human. She is the worst kind of politician - someone with no ideas of their own and who will do absolutely anything to boost her political standing and undermind her opponents.

Anonymous wrote:Michael Moore absolutely destroyed Warren on one of last podcasts. After he lists all of Warren’s history of lies and exaggerations it’s obvious who you should give the benefit of the doubt to. This is a woman who put “Native American” as her race (even though according to her DNA test she’s 1/64 Native at best) on a state bar application:

https://anchor.fm/rumble-with-michael-moore/episodes/Ep--19-The-Sad-Downfall-of-Elizabeth-Warren-ea6lql

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Elizabeth Warren was my strong first choice, this would be a mild ding against her. I'm still making up my mind as to who is my first choice, and this behavior reminds me of Trump (refusing to shake hands, putting something inflammatory out there so he either agrees with her or is "calling her a liar.") Definitely not a good move for her.

I could see them having discussed something like who would be most electable, in private. I don't think whatever was discussed should be public record. That is, if Bernie said something honest like "I don't know if America is ready to elect its first woman president" I don't see any good reason to share that on stage at a debate.

Why not? That says something about Bernie's mindset. He has never been supportive of women's issues. Why is it wrong for voter's to know that?

You mean he’s not wasted a lot of time reciting the cliches of rich women who like to think they can define “women’s issues”.

M4A and economic justice as advocated by Bernie would do massively more to improve more women’s lives (on an absolute and relative basis, btw) than all that crap professional feminists like to whine about.

Nope. Anyone who thinks that abortion rights can be bargained away and doesn’t understand that reproductive rights ARE an economic issue doesn’t understand bupkiss.

Who’s propaganda convinced you he’s going to ‘bargain away’ abortion rights?

You seem to be posting from the Women for the Patriarchy HQ.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Elizabeth Warren was my strong first choice, this would be a mild ding against her. I'm still making up my mind as to who is my first choice, and this behavior reminds me of Trump (refusing to shake hands, putting something inflammatory out there so he either agrees with her or is "calling her a liar.") Definitely not a good move for her.

I could see them having discussed something like who would be most electable, in private. I don't think whatever was discussed should be public record. That is, if Bernie said something honest like "I don't know if America is ready to elect its first woman president" I don't see any good reason to share that on stage at a debate.

Why not? That says something about Bernie's mindset. He has never been supportive of women's issues. Why is it wrong for voter's to know that?

You mean he’s not wasted a lot of time reciting the cliches of rich women who like to think they can define “women’s issues”.

M4A and economic justice as advocated by Bernie would do massively more to improve more women’s lives (on an absolute and relative basis, btw) than all that crap professional feminists like to whine about.

Just a side note.... I heard somewhere recently that Bernie pays women on his campaign more than Warren. Can't remember the source.
Does anyone know if that is true?

He paid his female staffers less than his male staffers in 2016.

Source and methods??

The anti-Bernie trolls are out tonight!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Elizabeth Warren was my strong first choice, this would be a mild ding against her. I'm still making up my mind as to who is my first choice, and this behavior reminds me of Trump (refusing to shake hands, putting something inflammatory out there so he either agrees with her or is "calling her a liar.") Definitely not a good move for her.

I could see them having discussed something like who would be most electable, in private. I don't think whatever was discussed should be public record. That is, if Bernie said something honest like "I don't know if America is ready to elect its first woman president" I don't see any good reason to share that on stage at a debate.

Why not? That says something about Bernie's mindset. He has never been supportive of women's issues. Why is it wrong for voter's to know that?

You mean he’s not wasted a lot of time reciting the cliches of rich women who like to think they can define “women’s issues”.

M4A and economic justice as advocated by Bernie would do massively more to improve more women’s lives (on an absolute and relative basis, btw) than all that crap professional feminists like to whine about.

Nope. Anyone who thinks that abortion rights can be bargained away and doesn’t understand that reproductive rights ARE an economic issue doesn’t understand bupkiss.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Elizabeth Warren was my strong first choice, this would be a mild ding against her. I'm still making up my mind as to who is my first choice, and this behavior reminds me of Trump (refusing to shake hands, putting something inflammatory out there so he either agrees with her or is "calling her a liar.") Definitely not a good move for her.

I could see them having discussed something like who would be most electable, in private. I don't think whatever was discussed should be public record. That is, if Bernie said something honest like "I don't know if America is ready to elect its first woman president" I don't see any good reason to share that on stage at a debate.

Why not? That says something about Bernie's mindset. He has never been supportive of women's issues. Why is it wrong for voter's to know that?

You mean he’s not wasted a lot of time reciting the cliches of rich women who like to think they can define “women’s issues”.

M4A and economic justice as advocated by Bernie would do massively more to improve more women’s lives (on an absolute and relative basis, btw) than all that crap professional feminists like to whine about.

Just a side note.... I heard somewhere recently that Bernie pays women on his campaign more than Warren. Can't remember the source.
Does anyone know if that is true?

He paid his female staffers less than his male staffers in 2016.