Anonymous wrote:I wanted 3 but have 2. I still think my heart wants a third, but my head knows that isn't right for our family. Sometimes, you have to look at your situation realistically and know when to stop.
We do not have the finances to give 3 kids everything we want to give. Also, my DH isn't the most helpful- despite years of trying and some improvement on his part. If he were the type of man who shared chores equally, perhaps a third would make sense. But he doesn't, and I am only capable of so much.
Anonymous wrote:If you got pregnant today you'd be 42 when the baby is born. A little long in the tooth, wouldn't you say? Two is plenty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have three kids and it's wonderful. One of my kids has special needs, and I wouldn't trade him for the world. I doubt any of your kids are even half as awesome as he is!
Why did you feel the need to say that?
NP but I think it can be off putting to hear so many people say they stopped because they didn't want to risk a child with SN. But...it's one thing to have a baby with SN and love that child, it's another to feel that it would be daunting to have a SN child you have not met yet sometime in the future....both feelings can be true. But I get that it would be annoying to hear that as the parent of a SN child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have three kids and it's wonderful. One of my kids has special needs, and I wouldn't trade him for the world. I doubt any of your kids are even half as awesome as he is!
Why did you feel the need to say that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have three kids and it's wonderful. One of my kids has special needs, and I wouldn't trade him for the world. I doubt any of your kids are even half as awesome as he is!
Why did you feel the need to say that?
Because OP made it clear she did not want a child with special needs. Well some of us have children with special needs and they’re pretty amazing! I’m so sick of people acting like parenting our kids would be such an awful thing. Of course we’d all like our children to have an easy life but my child’s life is very much worth living and I would have him a million times over. Either you want a child or you don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have 3 (twins and a third) and debated for years about having a 4th. In retrospect I'm so happy we didn't have the 4th.
Why?
-I've found the older my kids get, the crazier their (and our) lives are. Mine are now 13, 13, 10. We run like crazy people taking them to practices, school events, concerts, parties, etc.
I feel like I exist in roller skates and I'm always driving. Having multiple kids is easy when they're young and REALLY easy when they're under 5 and all you're worrying about is feeding them, dressing them and getting them to sleep. In my experience it gets nuts when they're in middle school.
-I'm now 45 and I'm far more tired than I was at 40. I felt like 41-42 was interchangeable with 30 or 35. These last few years I've felt age creep on. I've discussed this with many friends and we all agree. There's a shift in energy, etc that happens mid 40's.
-We love to travel internationally with our kids and it gets SO much easier each year. We've gone on a big trip every year since our youngest was 2 (so the past 8 years). My kids became pros at sitting on long-haul flights (Asia, etc) since they were young. They visit museums, historical sights like it's their job. However, it all gets so much easier each year. Even if your kids are good travelers, when they're young they're just slower and everything takes a million years. Now at 13 and 10 they pack themselves. They can deal with jet lag without a hiccup. They can wait to pee if the next bathroom isn't for 2 more hours. They don't need a drink or complain even if they're thirsty. They can run for a train connection, etc. All these things (over the course of a vacation) make a trip far more enjoyable. Also we're now able to do far more interesting things--we just came back from skiing in Europe. Lats winter we went backpacking in Patagonia. None of this would be possible if we still had a young kid in the mix.
I'm an earlier poster with 2 who now and again regrets not having another (but generally happy with where we are). EVERYONE I know who has 3 has said the thing about how much harder it is when they're older. Sure, it's annoying to have a crawling baby and a potty training toddler etc etc, but the logistics of their activities and lives in general gets exponentially more difficult once they hit late elementary and you really need to have a plan in place for managing that (flexible jobs, strong family and/or neighborhood support, etc).
I think you're both forgetting how hard the little kid years are. The sheer physical exhaustion, constant touching, tantrums, etc., all compound the potty-sleep-bedtime-don't touch that-don't eat that-everything else. Parents I trust with grown kids have said that it's hard all the way through, but the hard parts change. But what they don't do is act like the little kid years were a breeze, because they know better. I mean, unless you have automatons for children, I guess. I wouldn't even say my three are super challenging (the oldest, sometimes), and knock wood, they're typically developing and mostly healthy, but still. It's so, so unfair to the parents of small kids to pretend that they have it easy.