Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:News flash:
1. SNAP Benefits can only be used for food. Some people sell their benefits, but it’s hard and more rare than people would think. Food is expensive.
2. TANF is no windfall. A family of four with an HHI of 2400 per month gets about twenty dollars per month in cash assistance for every child without court ordered child support, even if the father does not pay. And no housing subsidy/voucher unless they are homeless and seeking housing. Waitlists are years long.
3. 37% of people in DC on SNAP, TANF, WIC benefits had a major medical emergency within the year applying for benefits that was not covered by their employer subsidized health insurance.
4. 97% of people on public benefits are working, in school, or have a major disability.
5. Highlighting outliers and scammers just gives more justification to discriminate and make value judgements .
You are not getting TANF on that income for a family of four.
-Former assistance worker
Anonymous wrote:News flash:
1. SNAP Benefits can only be used for food. Some people sell their benefits, but it’s hard and more rare than people would think. Food is expensive.
2. TANF is no windfall. A family of four with an HHI of 2400 per month gets about twenty dollars per month in cash assistance for every child without court ordered child support, even if the father does not pay. And no housing subsidy/voucher unless they are homeless and seeking housing. Waitlists are years long.
3. 37% of people in DC on SNAP, TANF, WIC benefits had a major medical emergency within the year applying for benefits that was not covered by their employer subsidized health insurance.
4. 97% of people on public benefits are working, in school, or have a major disability.
5. Highlighting outliers and scammers just gives more justification to discriminate and make value judgements .
Anonymous wrote:News flash:
1. SNAP Benefits can only be used for food. Some people sell their benefits, but it’s hard and more rare than people would think. Food is expensive.
2. TANF is no windfall. A family of four with an HHI of 2400 per month gets about twenty dollars per month in cash assistance for every child without court ordered child support, even if the father does not pay. And no housing subsidy/voucher unless they are homeless and seeking housing. Waitlists are years long.
3. 37% of people in DC on SNAP, TANF, WIC benefits had a major medical emergency within the year applying for benefits that was not covered by their employer subsidized health insurance.
4. 97% of people on public benefits are working, in school, or have a major disability.
5. Highlighting outliers and scammers just gives more justification to discriminate and make value judgements .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was recently in Nordstrom buying a pair of AGL flats which I wear daily. They cost $315 but are comfortable and last. The salesperson was also helping a young woman who was trying on boots. She kept asking if he had more expensive boots. He finally bought a pair that he announced were a little over $500. They had three inch heels and were above the knee but very ugly IMHO. The young woman looked told me u was a sucker for buying shoes no one had heard of; she was buying boots. She pulled six $100 bills from her wallet that had a visible SNAP card and a WIC card.
I wanted comfortable shoes; she wanted boots that would be recognized as expensive.
She was a hooker.
I was just going to say this. Hooker/escort making money under the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was recently in Nordstrom buying a pair of AGL flats which I wear daily. They cost $315 but are comfortable and last. The salesperson was also helping a young woman who was trying on boots. She kept asking if he had more expensive boots. He finally bought a pair that he announced were a little over $500. They had three inch heels and were above the knee but very ugly IMHO. The young woman looked told me u was a sucker for buying shoes no one had heard of; she was buying boots. She pulled six $100 bills from her wallet that had a visible SNAP card and a WIC card.
I wanted comfortable shoes; she wanted boots that would be recognized as expensive.
She was a hooker.
I was just going to say this. Hooker/escort making money under the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I got the impression she signed up for the angel tree to get the lululemon shorts.
I don’t get why everyone is so up in arms about this. Her daughter asked for the shorts. The article was her emotional journey towards accepting her situation and letting go of judgement. She even said, maybe one the rich moms in lululemon leggings would end up buying the shorts for them.
Was this “emotional journey” supposed to be profound or poignant? She came to the realization that rich people aren’t all bad for buying expensive athletic shorts. Am I supposed to get teary seeing the photo of her and her daughter wearing Lululemon? Uh, okay.
I don’t care that she bought $58 shorts but this was kind of a dumb article.
I just think it’s silly to get this angry because a mom did an angel tree for something expensive.
So, what? If you don’t want to give, don’t.
She didn’t ask for the shorts from the angel tree. She blew $116 on the shorts THEN asked for presents for Christmas because she had no money left for them.
It’s called personal responsibility. Which so many people these days just don’t have.
+1
And she doing so ruins it for others as I have to admit that I will think twice before donating again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was recently in Nordstrom buying a pair of AGL flats which I wear daily. They cost $315 but are comfortable and last. The salesperson was also helping a young woman who was trying on boots. She kept asking if he had more expensive boots. He finally bought a pair that he announced were a little over $500. They had three inch heels and were above the knee but very ugly IMHO. The young woman looked told me u was a sucker for buying shoes no one had heard of; she was buying boots. She pulled six $100 bills from her wallet that had a visible SNAP card and a WIC card.
I wanted comfortable shoes; she wanted boots that would be recognized as expensive.
She was a hooker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I got the impression she signed up for the angel tree to get the lululemon shorts.
I don’t get why everyone is so up in arms about this. Her daughter asked for the shorts. The article was her emotional journey towards accepting her situation and letting go of judgement. She even said, maybe one the rich moms in lululemon leggings would end up buying the shorts for them.
Was this “emotional journey” supposed to be profound or poignant? She came to the realization that rich people aren’t all bad for buying expensive athletic shorts. Am I supposed to get teary seeing the photo of her and her daughter wearing Lululemon? Uh, okay.
I don’t care that she bought $58 shorts but this was kind of a dumb article.
I just think it’s silly to get this angry because a mom did an angel tree for something expensive.
So, what? If you don’t want to give, don’t.
She didn’t ask for the shorts from the angel tree. She blew $116 on the shorts THEN asked for presents for Christmas because she had no money left for them.
It’s called personal responsibility. Which so many people these days just don’t have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I got the impression she signed up for the angel tree to get the lululemon shorts.
I don’t get why everyone is so up in arms about this. Her daughter asked for the shorts. The article was her emotional journey towards accepting her situation and letting go of judgement. She even said, maybe one the rich moms in lululemon leggings would end up buying the shorts for them.
Was this “emotional journey” supposed to be profound or poignant? She came to the realization that rich people aren’t all bad for buying expensive athletic shorts. Am I supposed to get teary seeing the photo of her and her daughter wearing Lululemon? Uh, okay.
I don’t care that she bought $58 shorts but this was kind of a dumb article.
I just think it’s silly to get this angry because a mom did an angel tree for something expensive.
So, what? If you don’t want to give, don’t.
She didn’t ask for the shorts from the angel tree. She blew $116 on the shorts THEN asked for presents for Christmas because she had no money left for them.
It’s called personal responsibility. Which so many people these days just don’t have.
No she didn't... she bought 1 pair for her daughter.
Later she bought her daughter more and it is her "go to gift".
The Xmas tree request was just because her H walked out 6 weeks before xmas. It's not like she does it every year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I got the impression she signed up for the angel tree to get the lululemon shorts.
I don’t get why everyone is so up in arms about this. Her daughter asked for the shorts. The article was her emotional journey towards accepting her situation and letting go of judgement. She even said, maybe one the rich moms in lululemon leggings would end up buying the shorts for them.
Was this “emotional journey” supposed to be profound or poignant? She came to the realization that rich people aren’t all bad for buying expensive athletic shorts. Am I supposed to get teary seeing the photo of her and her daughter wearing Lululemon? Uh, okay.
I don’t care that she bought $58 shorts but this was kind of a dumb article.
I just think it’s silly to get this angry because a mom did an angel tree for something expensive.
So, what? If you don’t want to give, don’t.
She didn’t ask for the shorts from the angel tree. She blew $116 on the shorts THEN asked for presents for Christmas because she had no money left for them.
It’s called personal responsibility. Which so many people these days just don’t have.