Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Actually
+1
It's especially objectionable because it was a criminal waste of a lot of talented actors. And it wasted some vague nuggets of half decent ideas by cramming them in with crappy ones. I can only figure that whoever greenlit it at the movie studio assumed Richard Curtis was gonna edit that monster script....
The stalker videographer and his cheater love placards... awful
+1
Anonymous wrote:Shawshank Redemption
Anonymous wrote:There's Something About Mary.
Anonymous wrote:The Hangover
Titanic
Whose Eating Gilbert Grape
Clueless
Pretty in Pink
Fast Times at Ridgmont High
God I'm old
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Actually
+1
It's especially objectionable because it was a criminal waste of a lot of talented actors. And it wasted some vague nuggets of half decent ideas by cramming them in with crappy ones. I can only figure that whoever greenlit it at the movie studio assumed Richard Curtis was gonna edit that monster script....
The stalker videographer and his cheater love placards... awful
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love Actually
+1
It's especially objectionable because it was a criminal waste of a lot of talented actors. And it wasted some vague nuggets of half decent ideas by cramming them in with crappy ones. I can only figure that whoever greenlit it at the movie studio assumed Richard Curtis was gonna edit that monster script....
Anonymous wrote:Anything with Ben Stiller’s in it