Anonymous wrote:At every age. At every level. A kid should get at least half a game playing time. The only exceptions would be: (1) injury or health concern (kid is sick but at the game) (2) discipline issue (broke team rule or had a red card etc). That’s it. No other exceptions. Don’t want to play a kid at least a half? Then don’t take their money. I do know a couple of times where a DA team took a couple of extra subs who might not play much over a weekend but they went for free. And the coaches got them in.
So - if money is being paid and no injury or discipline issues exist - then a coach must play every player, every time, at least half a game at every level. If you have a coach who cant figure out how to do that he/she should not coach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As parents you have to understand where you’re kid is and what level they will grow and keep their love for the game. People blame coaches for kids dropping out, it is the parents who have to put them in an environment they will play and love the game. No one and I mean no one loves being on the bench
Sure, but at U10, a coach should only pick up players he plans on playing. Don't fill a roster because you can. At U15, it's a different conversation.
Talk to the coach. Work on things to get better to earn more playing time. Understand that improving is a process and takes time. Playing time is not an entitlement.
No coach at U10 should pick up a player they don't intend to play. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As parents you have to understand where you’re kid is and what level they will grow and keep their love for the game. People blame coaches for kids dropping out, it is the parents who have to put them in an environment they will play and love the game. No one and I mean no one loves being on the bench
Sure, but at U10, a coach should only pick up players he plans on playing. Don't fill a roster because you can. At U15, it's a different conversation.
Talk to the coach. Work on things to get better to earn more playing time. Understand that improving is a process and takes time. Playing time is not an entitlement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As parents you have to understand where you’re kid is and what level they will grow and keep their love for the game. People blame coaches for kids dropping out, it is the parents who have to put them in an environment they will play and love the game. No one and I mean no one loves being on the bench
Sure, but at U10, a coach should only pick up players he plans on playing. Don't fill a roster because you can. At U15, it's a different conversation.
Anonymous wrote:As parents you have to understand where you’re kid is and what level they will grow and keep their love for the game. People blame coaches for kids dropping out, it is the parents who have to put them in an environment they will play and love the game. No one and I mean no one loves being on the bench
Anonymous wrote:Find a level where you’re child will be the star if you are concerned about playing time
Anonymous wrote:I have seen wingers and midfielders get moved to defense and it turn the game around. And I'm talking much older, like U15.
I do. And sometimes it's a game changer. A couple of salient points: if things are going poorly routinely, then that's a problem anyways. And then you also are creating a catch 22. You can't rotate because it's going poorly and you don't want to make things worse. And you can't when it's going well because now you have to protect the win.
But let's remember here. We are talking U10. Are they never allowed to make mistakes, learn, try a new position? That's a little much.
Exactly.
Again development versus winning a game. Everyone would like to have both on parallel upward trajectories.
A choice usually has to be made. And sometimes, more often than people want to admit, the other team is simply better.
EVERY coach worth salt should be rotating players.
Within reason, I agree. My son has played left back all season (he's U12) and does it very well. He'd like a chance to play some of the midfield positions, and he never gets one. The time he has been moved forward, he's been placed at striker or wing. He's pretty ineffective at both of these positions. That rotation was probably pointless, but I don't understand why he can never try midfield, no matter how many times he asks.
Our team had a new player who had always been pigeonholed as a striker because he was really fast, ambidextrous and skillful. He wasn’t bad, but not the best forward. We turned him into a very attack minded rightback and he became the best player on the team by far.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ask the coach why he’s throwing players in who have just arrived rather than using the players who were there on time. It’s pretty irresponsible as the players who just arrived haven’t been able to warm up properly. This exposes them to a drop in performance as well as injuries. Your coach should be able to shuffle players around and still put a competitive starting 11 out there. Even if players aren’t in their “ideal” position, they still have skill sets which lend themselves to be able to play other positions in a pinch. Having a base tactical system helps. Making sure the players are exposed to all 10 base tactical systems helps even more.
U10s play 7 v 7.