Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of townhouse complexes being built in this area. ^^^^
If we banned McMansions on say, 50% of the parcels where developers want to build them, there would still be plenty of McMansions built right? But fewer, and they would be scarcer and more expensive than otherwise.
Well that is the reality today for townhomes. We severely restrict where they can be built, which makes them scarcer and more expensive than otherwise.
I am NOT saying every teardown needs to become townhomes (or, grab your pearls, apartments) instead of mcmansions. Just saying let the market decide, instead of having zoning that in many places bans anything except a detached SFH.
Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of townhouse complexes being built in this area. ^^^^
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
I have zero problems with a large, spacious home. But why does your architect choose asymmetrical windows, graceless rooflines, or features from a mix of eras (like gables with castle turrets)? The buyers aren't making those choices, you are. The buyers are buying despite these features, because space and location trump aesthetic problems.
Please allow me to clarify. When we make the decisions, we know what a good plan/architecture looks like and appeals to the masses. You can have a large home that is "architecturally" pleasing and trust me, we know that is. We cannot afford to let a home sit to it has to sell - and our homes sell relatively quickly. When we refer a client for design to our architect, then the client calls the shots....and yes, they want turrets, high pitched roofs, dormers, marble throughout the home, fountains, and all of the other items pick on this forum...etc, etc. The architect and we give them exactly what they want and believe me, they are very pleased with it, and don't give a ratt's a## what other think!!! While we may make gentle suggestions on the design or material spec, they have the last say because we work for them. We don't scold them. It's their $$ and after all......and they are happy spending it this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The girl who makes this site is uber annoying. I’m not a fan of oversized McMansions either, but let people live and like what they like.
She's a woman, not a child. Her writing focus is not just aesthetic - but how these homes lack sustainability, undermine sense of community, and exacerbate de facto housing segregation.
Sorry Ms. Feminista
And yeah, again that’s their choice. Why invest so much energy into something that doesn’t impact your life. The gi...err woman who writes this just comes across as sad and desperate. I’d never even want a home like this, but if people want to spend money on these giant wastes of space, good on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
I have zero problems with a large, spacious home. But why does your architect choose asymmetrical windows, graceless rooflines, or features from a mix of eras (like gables with castle turrets)? The buyers aren't making those choices, you are. The buyers are buying despite these features, because space and location trump aesthetic problems.
Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are local custom builders and we employ a licensed AIA architect who cuts up designs just like these. Some are spec homes, others are where our homeowner clients comes to us and then sits down with this architect to design the plan. So the argument that builders just use a "draftsman/CAD operator" is just BS. The fact most don't want to face is these homes sell because they are large and spacious and that is why architects design them and we build them. I don't see this changing anytime soon..
Supply and demand....Agree with the PP builder. The DMV like any other metro area is diverse with funds to construct large homes, etc. While we live in a modest "tear down" neighborhood, we don't mind it one bit. Looking forward to dumping our home soon. The 1200 sqft ramber across from us just sold for $850K in one week with zero contingencies - for the lot only. We purchased our 3/4 acre lot with the home in 2004 for $220K. We get offers all the time for our property. The newer larger homes the McMansion Hell author and others are whinning about does not resonate with us. There is so much economic benefit from all of this - increased tax base, construction jobs, investment in the community, and of course more $$ in our pocket to take our $850K (mostly tax free of course) elsewhere and prosper!! Bunch of idiots you are!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just disappointed that my favorite McMansion model didn't catch her eye. I drove by one of these that is visible from Georgetown Pike and burst out laughing. It's just that over the top.
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/804-Hortense-Pl-Great-Falls-VA-22066/246582720_zpid/?mmlb=g,0
LOL! Omg that is absolutely hideous!!!
That thing is laughably bad. The giant castle like roofs and the already outdated looking appliances is hilarious
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just disappointed that my favorite McMansion model didn't catch her eye. I drove by one of these that is visible from Georgetown Pike and burst out laughing. It's just that over the top.
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/804-Hortense-Pl-Great-Falls-VA-22066/246582720_zpid/?mmlb=g,0
LOL! Omg that is absolutely hideous!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But these people evidently have tons of money and can't hire a decent architect.
I'd rather pay the $1.2 mil I did for my eyesore of a house with some land than $1.2 mil for a tiny townhouse in an urban setting.
Sorry, it's hard to hear the haters within my 6,200 sqft.![]()
![]()
Actually I'm sure you hear just about everything in your 6,200 sqft McMansion. Your walls are paper thin and everything is builder grade.
The worst part about visiting a McMansion is using their first floor powder room. You know everyone can hear your unbuttoning your pants, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I'm just disappointed that my favorite McMansion model didn't catch her eye. I drove by one of these that is visible from Georgetown Pike and burst out laughing. It's just that over the top.
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/804-Hortense-Pl-Great-Falls-VA-22066/246582720_zpid/?mmlb=g,0