Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Why is this question so hard for you? Is tweeting from inside the SCIF outrage worthy or not?

I answered the question ..... it was not an answer that you liked. If national security was jeopardized it is a concern otherwise it is a procedural violation but hardly anything to get hysterical about.

Anyway, come tomorrow, this will recede into the background and we will have the next faux outrage of the day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

In this case the “faux outrage” is on the GOP side. They have been pounding the table for weeks about the House following rules they themselves set up when they were in the majority. Trey Gowdy himself threw Darrell Issa out of a Benghazi Committee hearing because he wasn’t on that committee. But the crazy Trump defenders in the House see that bitching about the process is the only thing they can do to hide the obvious high crimes and misdemeanors that the depositions are uncovering, so they lie like rugs telling their complicit “media” and their unsophisticated followers that there are no Republicans allowed access to this process. In fact, there are 108 members - 46 Republicans and 62 Democrats - on the three committees leading the impeachment inquiry. That's roughly a quarter of all House Republicans, House Democrats and the entire House taking part in proceedings.

Guess how many members districts this proceeding is inquiring about; 535.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

In this case the “faux outrage” is on the GOP side. They have been pounding the table for weeks about the House following rules they themselves set up when they were in the majority. Trey Gowdy himself threw Darrell Issa out of a Benghazi Committee hearing because he wasn’t on that committee. But the crazy Trump defenders in the House see that bitching about the process is the only thing they can do to hide the obvious high crimes and misdemeanors that the depositions are uncovering, so they lie like rugs telling their complicit “media” and their unsophisticated followers that there are no Republicans allowed access to this process. In fact, Some context: there are 108 members - 46 Republicans and 62 Democrats - on the three committees leading the impeachment inquiry. That's roughly a quarter of all House Republicans, House Democrats and the entire House taking part in proceedings.

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Why is this question so hard for you? Is tweeting from inside the SCIF outrage worthy or not?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m in Ohio. How do I find out if my congressman is part of this?

Who’s your congressman? First step in the process of elimination would be to see if he’s on the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs or Oversight Committees. If he is, then he’s participating in the hearings and therefore not part of this stunt.

David Joyce. I don’t believe he sits on any of those committees. I have always considered him somewhat reasonable, and would be very disappointed if he participated in this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In response to this, it may be time for Schiff and Pelosi to just go ahead and have these depositions public and televised. Show the country all of Trump's crimes.

You guys don’t get it. They will eventually do that. But not during the investigation phase.

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.