Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How normal is it for transcripts or memos concerning phone calls between the President and foreign leaders to be moved to a special server that is normally only used for highly covert activities such as black ops?

I believe Maguire said that’s unprecedented.

So what are the implications?

I love how Trump retweets or quotes right wing entertainers like their word is somehow the final say! Like, if Geraldo says I'm innocent, then it MUST be true!

LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

That’s bullsh!t, the whistleblower said most activities were not directly witnessed, not all.

Anonymous wrote:How normal is it for transcripts or memos concerning phone calls between the President and foreign leaders to be moved to a special server that is normally only used for highly covert activities such as black ops?

I believe Maguire said that’s unprecedented.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

Was there anything in their description of the July 25, 2019 phone call that contradicted the summary release the White House provided yesterday?

How normal is it for transcripts or memos concerning phone calls between the President and foreign leaders to be moved to a special server that is normally only used for highly covert activities such as black ops?

Trump calling for death for the whistleblower and anyone else who speaks out.

“I want to know who’s the person, who’s the person who gave the whistle-blower the information? Because that’s close to a spy,” he continued. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-26/trump-at-private-breakfast-who-gave-the-whistle-blower-the-information-because-thats-almost-a-spy

Who will resign, and in what order?
How can Barr continue as AG with all this hanging? Not just recusal from Ukraine or impeachment matters, but any matter?
And the unnamed WH officials who helped move the phone conversation to TS systems - shouldn't they resign and save themselves?
Pompeo? If he has any hope of ever being elected to anything, he needs to jump ship.
What about Melania? Can she finally leave DT?
[Report Post]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

We’re not on a jury, we’re opening an investigation.

If you called the police and told them you heard your business partner murdered his wife, and multiple people who worked for you gave you detailed reports about your business partner murdering his wife, what would the police say?

Obviously investigate. But to open an investigation into impeaching the president without ANY first hand accounts is odd. None of those people would have come out with the whistle blower to collaborate this?

I think Trump's and Guiliani's statements are enough of indication that there is a there.

Seriously. Trump has admitted to most of this although he keeps changing his story. And the complaint tracks the memo about the call that Trump released exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

We’re not on a jury, we’re opening an investigation.

If you called the police and told them you heard your business partner murdered his wife, and multiple people who worked for you gave you detailed reports about your business partner murdering his wife, what would the police say?

Obviously investigate. But to open an investigation into impeaching the president without ANY first hand accounts is odd. None of those people would have come out with the whistle blower to collaborate this?

Dude, Trump himself released the call transcript. It's not like there isn't ANY evidence to get started.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

We’re not on a jury, we’re opening an investigation.

If you called the police and told them you heard your business partner murdered his wife, and multiple people who worked for you gave you detailed reports about your business partner murdering his wife, what would the police say?

Obviously investigate. But to open an investigation into impeaching the president without ANY first hand accounts is odd. None of those people would have come out with the whistle blower to collaborate this?

I think Trump's and Guiliani's statements are enough of indication that there is a there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

We’re not on a jury, we’re opening an investigation.

If you called the police and told them you heard your business partner murdered his wife, and multiple people who worked for you gave you detailed reports about your business partner murdering his wife, what would the police say?

Obviously investigate. But to open an investigation into impeaching the president without ANY first hand accounts is odd. None of those people would have come out with the whistle blower to collaborate this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

We’re not on a jury, we’re opening an investigation.

If you called the police and told them you heard your business partner murdered his wife, and multiple people who worked for you gave you detailed reports about your business partner murdering his wife, what would the police say?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its all hearsay..... nothing to see here and nothing which will hold water anyhow.

Don't use words you don't understand well enough to use correctly in context.

Its all second hand information, this person didn't see or hear any of it themselves. That's hearsay...

From Twitter:



Trump WH!