Anonymous wrote:Yeah there definitely seems to be a vibe here like, “we won the meritocracy, you must bow to us now.” Not sure that is an actual requirement of social policy. I at least am more interested in seeing if I can make something good for as many people as possible before looking at extracting the best for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that it’s the high SES families that are expected to accept risk without any concessions or guarantees. If DCPS were to remove, say, Lafayette from Deal they better darn well guarantee in an EOTP school there will be tracking, zero tolerance for disruptive students and those with poor attendance, crack down on residency fraud, etc. But DCPS will never do that. So instead they try to sell some immeasurable benefit like our kids will be “able to work well diverse groups in the future.” That’s just not enough.
100% correct. And "your kid will be fine because they are high SES" is also missing the mark. "Fine" is not -- nor will it ever be -- enough for this cohort of WOTP families.
Great, then enjoy your over-crowded HS and MS and stfu.
So that's the answer: We won't help you because you want your kids to do too well. Gotcha.
You know, in many cities, they actually want their students to be high achieving?
Nope. It's that if you refuse a pro-social, community-minded solution to allocating scarce resources, then the system is not going to go out of its way to help you. You've made clear that you believe you are your own little special island in DCPS, so that's what you'll get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that it’s the high SES families that are expected to accept risk without any concessions or guarantees. If DCPS were to remove, say, Lafayette from Deal they better darn well guarantee in an EOTP school there will be tracking, zero tolerance for disruptive students and those with poor attendance, crack down on residency fraud, etc. But DCPS will never do that. So instead they try to sell some immeasurable benefit like our kids will be “able to work well diverse groups in the future.” That’s just not enough.
100% correct. And "your kid will be fine because they are high SES" is also missing the mark. "Fine" is not -- nor will it ever be -- enough for this cohort of WOTP families.
Great, then enjoy your over-crowded HS and MS and stfu.
So that's the answer: We won't help you because you want your kids to do too well. Gotcha.
You know, in many cities, they actually want their students to be high achieving?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At minimum, I EOTP man, will not pay for another expansion of Deal or Wilson. NOPE.
OK that's fine. Will you also do what you can to stop OOB kids from attending? Will you agree to send your own kid to your IB HS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At minimum, I EOTP man, will not pay for another expansion of Deal or Wilson. NOPE.
OK that's fine. Will you also do what you can to stop OOB kids from attending? Will you agree to send your own kid to your IB HS?
Anonymous wrote:At minimum, I EOTP man, will not pay for another expansion of Deal or Wilson. NOPE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that it’s the high SES families that are expected to accept risk without any concessions or guarantees. If DCPS were to remove, say, Lafayette from Deal they better darn well guarantee in an EOTP school there will be tracking, zero tolerance for disruptive students and those with poor attendance, crack down on residency fraud, etc. But DCPS will never do that. So instead they try to sell some immeasurable benefit like our kids will be “able to work well diverse groups in the future.” That’s just not enough.
100% correct. And "your kid will be fine because they are high SES" is also missing the mark. "Fine" is not -- nor will it ever be -- enough for this cohort of WOTP families.
Great, then enjoy your over-crowded HS and MS and stfu.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that it’s the high SES families that are expected to accept risk without any concessions or guarantees. If DCPS were to remove, say, Lafayette from Deal they better darn well guarantee in an EOTP school there will be tracking, zero tolerance for disruptive students and those with poor attendance, crack down on residency fraud, etc. But DCPS will never do that. So instead they try to sell some immeasurable benefit like our kids will be “able to work well diverse groups in the future.” That’s just not enough.
100% correct. And "your kid will be fine because they are high SES" is also missing the mark. "Fine" is not -- nor will it ever be -- enough for this cohort of WOTP families.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that it’s the high SES families that are expected to accept risk without any concessions or guarantees. If DCPS were to remove, say, Lafayette from Deal they better darn well guarantee in an EOTP school there will be tracking, zero tolerance for disruptive students and those with poor attendance, crack down on residency fraud, etc. But DCPS will never do that. So instead they try to sell some immeasurable benefit like our kids will be “able to work well diverse groups in the future.” That’s just not enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Advanced classes don’t lead to better outcomes. https://medium.com/edmodoblog/avoid-ap-course-overload-it-matters-less-than-you-think-3382c064d7f2
That's not exactly what the article said, but in any event, AP is only one form of "advanced classes" and only for high school level.
[blockquote]...as one widely-cited study by Klopfenstein and Thomas (2010) found, “there is no evidence from methodologically rigorous studies that AP experience causes students to be successful in college.”
While the research from the CollegeBoard has consistently found that AP courses provide benefits, one summary of the research reports that this is in big part because AP “students tend to be from higher income families, are more likely to be White and attend suburban schools, and have better academic preparation for high school than non-AP students.” [/blockquote]
So go ahead and do what you want but know that the conventional wisdom is not some slam dunk put down of anyone else. I understand that Americans make residential choices based on assumptions and beliefs about how school environments will affect their children’s outcomes. But segregation for educational outcomes is not a choice you must make. And I will not, and I will not just stand by and let DCUM ‘wisdom’ affect my choices.
The article actually said to take "honors courses," rather than AP courses. Basically, AP courses are not honors courses because they don't challenge deep thinking and merely teach to the test. Not coincidentally, private schools are discontinuing AP classes because they don't sufficiently challenge the mind.
It's the intellectual processing speed of the classroom cohort that matters for high-achieving students. The article merely supports that truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with PP that public schools are designed to teach the average masses. If your child falls outside of that average- for whatever reason- you might need to either (1) gain special accommodations for your child or (2) find a different school. DC schools do not seem to be in the business of accommodations for extremely advanced and/or gifted kids. So kids in this category might have to look elsewhere. It isn't the big deal that people make it out to be. Like everything else in life, you need or want something different than the basic (free) option, pay for the upgrade.
lol this is how you justify paying private tuition.
the actual academic elite kids don't need private schools.