Anonymous wrote:It was capitalism that stopped the broad 1980s movement to address climate change, risking global survival. But keep shitting your pants over East Germany and Venezuela. You guys have no idea how much your brains have been ruined by propaganda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Socialism defined by the laws of math. I produce 4 widgets, the less productive person next to me produces 2 widgets. I now have three widgets. How many do you think I will attempt to produce tomorrow.
See, for example, East Germany.
Bernie and Warren love the good old East Germany.
I wonder why they didn't move there.
Because after socialism crapped out in East Germany, the capitalist West Germany saved the East Germans from socialism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Socialism defined by the laws of math. I produce 4 widgets, the less productive person next to me produces 2 widgets. I now have three widgets. How many do you think I will attempt to produce tomorrow.
See, for example, East Germany.
Bernie and Warren love the good old East Germany.
I wonder why they didn't move there.
Because after socialism crapped out in East Germany, the capitalist West Germany saved the East Germans from socialism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Socialism defined by the laws of math. I produce 4 widgets, the less productive person next to me produces 2 widgets. I now have three widgets. How many do you think I will attempt to produce tomorrow.
See, for example, East Germany.
Bernie and Warren love the good old East Germany.
I wonder why they didn't move there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just read some philosophy, economics and then familiarize yourself with the philosophy. For some strange reason the ideas won't die
Don't ask the idiots here
I wondered about this and believe I found a somewhat satisfying answer. As a generalization, leftist politics appeals to those who have character traits that are open, creative, and empathetic. These are our entrepreneurs, our artists, and our risk takers. They are more idealistic in their worldview, with more focus on the result, and less concern on how to get there. What leftists/progressives tend to do, then, is confuse their intentions with the method of achieving those results. They think the end justifies the means. They want racial equality in the outcome of our education system, so therefore it is OK to use racially discriminating policies like affirmative action to achieve it. They want more income/wealth equality, so tax-and-redistribution is a good way to get there. They want everyone to have good quality health care, and government funded single-payer is the fastest way to get there. They want affordable rent - therefore rent control.
Look at their intentions: racial equality, lower income/wealth inequality, good quality healthcare available to everyone, affordable rent - all of these are laudable goals. Are right-wing/conservatives against any of these outcomes? I know I'm not. I am in strong agreement with each and every one of these goals. Where we diverge is that the leftist/progressives will argue that because their intentions are good, that their methods are good, and that anyone who is against their method of achieving these goals must therefore be against the goals themselves. And thus Republicans/Conservatives are evil, racists, homophobic, xenophobic, and etc.
Anonymous wrote:Just read some philosophy, economics and then familiarize yourself with the philosophy. For some strange reason the ideas won't die
Don't ask the idiots here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a philosophy or as an economic system? In present day or in the past?
Oh my lord. It's not that hard. Socialism is a philosophy about an economic system - it's a predictive framework for attaining the desired outcomes of abundance and equality. When implemented, socialism has caused nothing but mass suffering and death. It has done this in the past and is presently working its evil magic in places like Cuba and Venezuela.
But that was not Democratic Socialism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a philosophy or as an economic system? In present day or in the past?
Oh my lord. It's not that hard. Socialism is a philosophy about an economic system - it's a predictive framework for attaining the desired outcomes of abundance and equality. When implemented, socialism has caused nothing but mass suffering and death. It has done this in the past and is presently working its evil magic in places like Cuba and Venezuela.
Anonymous wrote:As a philosophy or as an economic system? In present day or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Socialism defined by the laws of math. I produce 4 widgets, the less productive person next to me produces 2 widgets. I now have three widgets. How many do you think I will attempt to produce tomorrow.
See, for example, East Germany.
Bernie and Warren love the good old East Germany.
I wonder why they didn't move there.