Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100 years ago, it was really common for kids to live at home until they were married, which sometimes meant until their parents died if they never married. One difference is that those children were expected to contribute to the household, both financially and through work around the house (cooking, cleaning, repairs, etc.). I don't have a problem with young people living with their parents, so long as they are being adult about it and contributing to the household -- that seems to me just a cultural choice, rather than a failure to become an adult. Free-riding is a problem.
Lol. I don’t think this thread is about productive adults living at home after college.
Okay, caveat. IF you are single, in grad school or soon to go to grad school, you get a pass. But if you are an educated, grown ass adult and you still live at home - That is FTL! You don't get to call yourself a productive adult if you are still living in your parents' house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100 years ago, it was really common for kids to live at home until they were married, which sometimes meant until their parents died if they never married. One difference is that those children were expected to contribute to the household, both financially and through work around the house (cooking, cleaning, repairs, etc.). I don't have a problem with young people living with their parents, so long as they are being adult about it and contributing to the household -- that seems to me just a cultural choice, rather than a failure to become an adult. Free-riding is a problem.
Lol. I don’t think this thread is about productive adults living at home after college.
Okay, caveat. IF you are single, in grad school or soon to go to grad school, you get a pass. But if you are an educated, grown ass adult and you still live at home - That is FTL! You don't get to call yourself a productive adult if you are still living in your parents' house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100 years ago, it was really common for kids to live at home until they were married, which sometimes meant until their parents died if they never married. One difference is that those children were expected to contribute to the household, both financially and through work around the house (cooking, cleaning, repairs, etc.). I don't have a problem with young people living with their parents, so long as they are being adult about it and contributing to the household -- that seems to me just a cultural choice, rather than a failure to become an adult. Free-riding is a problem.
Lol. I don’t think this thread is about productive adults living at home after college.
Okay, caveat. IF you are single, in grad school or soon to go to grad school, you get a pass. But if you are an educated, grown ass adult and you still live at home - That is FTL! You don't get to call yourself a productive adult if you are still living in your parents' house.
Anonymous wrote:Star athlete, super popular at pricey prep school, good grades, super involved parents (Mom head of PTA)....depression once he hit college...never graduated and can’t hold a job.
Anonymous wrote:Contrary to what some posters want to believe, I see more "floundering" kids from laissez faire families than from overly involved families where the parents established strong frameworks for growing up with high expectations and a clear path to adulthood. The helicopter parents got their kids out of the house into good colleges, then good grad schools and then good careers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ It’s been shown that the truly successful children are the ones being supplemented by mom and dad. They are able to live in better conditions than peers, which affords them better job opportunities and access to partners that also have better economic foundations.
So, if parents can afford to subsidize or cover living expenses, that's good.
If parents can't afford that, but can afford to have kids living at home with them for similar economic savings for the child, that's bad?
Your privilege is showing.
Anonymous wrote:^ It’s been shown that the truly successful children are the ones being supplemented by mom and dad. They are able to live in better conditions than peers, which affords them better job opportunities and access to partners that also have better economic foundations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100 years ago, it was really common for kids to live at home until they were married, which sometimes meant until their parents died if they never married. One difference is that those children were expected to contribute to the household, both financially and through work around the house (cooking, cleaning, repairs, etc.). I don't have a problem with young people living with their parents, so long as they are being adult about it and contributing to the household -- that seems to me just a cultural choice, rather than a failure to become an adult. Free-riding is a problem.
Lol. I don’t think this thread is about productive adults living at home after college.
Anonymous wrote:Contrary to what some posters want to believe, I see more "floundering" kids from laissez faire families than from overly involved families where the parents established strong frameworks for growing up with high expectations and a clear path to adulthood. The helicopter parents got their kids out of the house into good colleges, then good grad schools and then good careers.