Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
He got his retraction from WaPo. He doesn't get a defamation judgment and $250m. That's just silly.
Not good enough. Reporting ,” twitter says this” isn’t acceptable.
You'd rather they didn't report "Twitter says this"? Ostrich much?
I’d rather they actually did their jobs and checked their facts.
Twitter is a fact.
Defamation was the wrong avenue. Lin Wood took this on as a way to change current First Amendment law -- that means that under current law, the kid loses. Current law is not on his side.
Anonymous wrote:another liberal activist just, Appointed by: Jimmy Carter
Sandmann has two additional pending lawsuits against CNN and NBC.
Anonymous wrote:another liberal activist just, Appointed by: Jimmy Carter
Sandmann has two additional pending lawsuits against CNN and NBC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
He got his retraction from WaPo. He doesn't get a defamation judgment and $250m. That's just silly.
Not good enough. Reporting ,” twitter says this” isn’t acceptable.
You'd rather they didn't report "Twitter says this"? Ostrich much?
I’d rather they actually did their jobs and checked their facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
He got his retraction from WaPo. He doesn't get a defamation judgment and $250m. That's just silly.
Not good enough. Reporting ,” twitter says this” isn’t acceptable.
You'd rather they didn't report "Twitter says this"? Ostrich much?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/29/covington-catholic-teen-lost-first-court-battle-will-probably-win-next/
An interesting perspective
The Covington Catholic Teen Lost His First Court Battle, But Will Probably Win His Next
On Friday, a federal judge in Kentucky tossed Nicholas Sandmann’s defamation case against the Washington Post. Here’s why Sandmann is likely to win on appeal
That is a very weak analysis. Either she was a terrible clerk, or she’s disingenuous because she’s writing what her intended audience wants to hear rather than a rigorous analysis of the decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
He got his retraction from WaPo. He doesn't get a defamation judgment and $250m. That's just silly.
Not good enough. Reporting ,” twitter says this” isn’t acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
He got his retraction from WaPo. He doesn't get a defamation judgment and $250m. That's just silly.
Anonymous wrote:https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/29/covington-catholic-teen-lost-first-court-battle-will-probably-win-next/
An interesting perspective
The Covington Catholic Teen Lost His First Court Battle, But Will Probably Win His Next
On Friday, a federal judge in Kentucky tossed Nicholas Sandmann’s defamation case against the Washington Post. Here’s why Sandmann is likely to win on appeal
Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
Anonymous wrote:A few of us are able to understand that the kid is an entitled little sh#t, who needs to sat the F down and let grown as women decide what is best for their own lives and bodies.
And understand that what happened to him in the media was grossly irresponsible and as a society we need to expect more from journalists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/29/covington-catholic-teen-lost-first-court-battle-will-probably-win-next/
An interesting perspective
The Covington Catholic Teen Lost His First Court Battle, But Will Probably Win His Next
On Friday, a federal judge in Kentucky tossed Nicholas Sandmann’s defamation case against the Washington Post. Here’s why Sandmann is likely to win on appeal
These conservatives are such tender little snowflakes.
I'd like to see how tenderly you would react if it was your teenager caught in the crosshairs of this scenario.
Who wants to see their kid in this light, when they went to Washington for an exciting field trip, and instead end up front page news, not in a good way. This situation was engineered by an old grizzled guy who ought to have known better. He seized an opportunity to do harm. I cannot respect that. Pick a fight with someone your own size.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/29/covington-catholic-teen-lost-first-court-battle-will-probably-win-next/
An interesting perspective
The Covington Catholic Teen Lost His First Court Battle, But Will Probably Win His Next
On Friday, a federal judge in Kentucky tossed Nicholas Sandmann’s defamation case against the Washington Post. Here’s why Sandmann is likely to win on appeal
These conservatives are such tender little snowflakes.
I'd like to see how tenderly you would react if it was your teenager caught in the crosshairs of this scenario.
Who wants to see their kid in this light, when they went to Washington for an exciting field trip, and instead end up front page news, not in a good way. This situation was engineered by an old grizzled guy who ought to have known better. He seized an opportunity to do harm. I cannot respect that. Pick a fight with someone your own size.