Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not PP, I believes Madlax leads in terms of player quantity for '21s at 42 players, '20s at 31 players. Could be a numbers game for Madlax but less so for the player - not sure how all these players get exposed in games to recruiters. Perhaps a parent can weigh in?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mad lax college placement is second to none.
Those days are (thankfully) long over. NL and DCE will outperform ML in '20 and '21.
Define "outperform."
Madlax '21 Capital team had 26 players. The rest were on DMV and went to different tournaments. With injuries and other absences, about 23-24 were at the tournaments. A lot, but not unmanageable. Most played about a half in each game. A few played a lot more than that, and a few played less than that.
No clue how it worked with the '20s.
Anonymous wrote:Not PP, I believes Madlax leads in terms of player quantity for '21s at 42 players, '20s at 31 players. Could be a numbers game for Madlax but less so for the player - not sure how all these players get exposed in games to recruiters. Perhaps a parent can weigh in?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mad lax college placement is second to none.
Those days are (thankfully) long over. NL and DCE will outperform ML in '20 and '21.
Define "outperform."
Not PP, I believes Madlax leads in terms of player quantity for '21s at 42 players, '20s at 31 players. Could be a numbers game for Madlax but less so for the player - not sure how all these players get exposed in games to recruiters. Perhaps a parent can weigh in?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mad lax college placement is second to none.
Those days are (thankfully) long over. NL and DCE will outperform ML in '20 and '21.
Define "outperform."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mad lax college placement is second to none.
Those days are (thankfully) long over. NL and DCE will outperform ML in '20 and '21.
Anonymous wrote:Mad lax college placement is second to none.