Anonymous wrote:George is cute, Charlotte is average and Louis is homely. Archie is up there with George on the cuteness scale. If I had to guess, as they age he’ll surpass him based on the fact that George looks just like his father and we can all see how that’s turned out.

This baby isn't cute. I'd agree with average at best. sounds mean - But my son was far from beautiful when he was born. He is now an attractive young man. Genes can be funny things.

Anonymous wrote:George is cute, Charlotte is average and Louis is homely. Archie is up there with George on the cuteness scale. If I had to guess, as they age he’ll surpass him based on the fact that George looks just like his father and we can all see how that’s turned out.

He’ll have very light skin and a fro. Not usually an attractive combo.

Anonymous wrote:Is this a bad pic of Doria ? She looks like she had surgery on her lips. Or it’s just my computer

Yes, her lips do look odd and her face seems thinner like she's lost weight.

I think it's just a bad picture because I've seen other recent pictures of her and she looks just fine.

George is cute, Charlotte is average and Louis is homely. Archie is up there with George on the cuteness scale. If I had to guess, as they age he’ll surpass him based on the fact that George looks just like his father and we can all see how that’s turned out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

Well those babies were so cute! Way above average on the baby cuteness scale. This one is...meh, not ugly.

And just bc I know it’ll piss a few of the pps off... it was Kate’s genes that made those babies cute. She is so lovely. Her husband and his family aren’t very attractive.

Doesn't piss me off. Windsor genes are notoriously inbred and ugly. That's why beautiful women marrying in like Diana/Kate/Meghan are a blessing. Just glad the royals stopped marrying their cousins before it became irreversible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

Well those babies were so cute! Way above average on the baby cuteness scale. This one is...meh, not ugly.

LMAO George looked like Churchill's doppelganger. Old, fat, heavy-jowled and grumpy. He's vastly improved in the adorable range.




Meanwhile little Archie looks blissful and sweet. Did anyone notice that George's hair was DARKER at the Christening than it is now?

Is this a bad pic of Doria ? She looks like she had surgery on her lips. Or it’s just my computer

Andddd it only took 6 pages for that to happen. Congratulations on your restraint.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

Well those babies were so cute! Way above average on the baby cuteness scale. This one is...meh, not ugly.

And just bc I know it’ll piss a few of the pps off... it was Kate’s genes that made those babies cute. She is so lovely. Her husband and his family aren’t very attractive.

Anonymous wrote:I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

Well those babies were so cute! Way above average on the baby cuteness scale. This one is...meh, not ugly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He looks just like Thomas markle!

As a very young man, her dad was pretty cute with good features. His lifestyle and added weight over the years has hidden those features.

Wow he looks a lot like his daughter in that pic. I don’t think he is either ugly or very cute. Average.

Anonymous wrote:I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

All young babies look pretty similar, including him.

I hope all of the “It’s just a baby” posters respond similarly to the Cambridge kids, but somehow I doubt it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woooooow Kate looks amazing

This is the FIRST TIME .. those words have ever left my keyboard

They shouldn’t have.

I was thinking that she does look much better.

Anonymous wrote:Diana’s sister in the back middle is wearing the same hat I bought at Zara to wear to the beach for $29! Nice.

Diana’s sisters are horsey-set aristos and getting older so they wear whatever they want and don’t give a hoot about the fashion police. They also may not have known they’d be in the portrait.