Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Breech is high risk, and she ignored the signs of distress for too long. This midwife should be prosecuted.
The mother should too TBH
ITA! The mother is every bit as responsible as the midwife and absolutely should be prosecuted. I frankly don't see any distinction between the midwife's culpability and the mother's.
The mother isn't a medical professional. She hired one, or someone who she thought was a medical professional. Her culpability is certainly not the same as the "midwife's".
Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I^ I am not a homebirther by any stretch, or a natural birther. Epidural all the way for me
But given that the US truly does have abysmal fetal and maternal mortality rates, like truly abysmal, the same argument could apply: anyone who would knowingly take the risk of a hospital birth given the statistics, is taking their baby's life in their hands.
Try to separate emotion. Women make choices that feel right and while it is true some babies would be better off in the hospital birth, the reverse is true as well.
Just stop the name calling and try to LISTEN.
um no ... I'm not listening to utter nonsense. This woman had a breech baby - she had NO business having a home birth.
.
Yes. And that would be all fine and good of this thread had stayed on this woman and this midwife. But it diverged into ALL homebirths.
Many responses has nothing to do with OP.
Are we not allowed to respond to other posts in the thread now?
No, that PP made the idiotic and illogical claim that "Bad things happen in the hospital, therefore, it is safer to have a homebirth."
If you can't see the logical flaws in that, I don't know what to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New PP here.
I had a home birth. Low risk pregnancy. Textbook delivery. Attended by 2 midwives and an apprentice. Baby nursed within moments of birth. I was never separated from him. Beautiful healthy kid. Fully vaccinated, by the way.
It was the right choice for me and my baby. I avoided the stress of strangers traipsing through my room disturbing the privacy that is most conducive to labor. I avoided hospital staff watching the clock to see if I met the hospital's policy about how fast my labor should progress, avoided pitocin and starting the cascade of intense contractions that can't be managed without an epidural. I avoided nurses shouting at me to wait to push because the doctor wasn't ready yet. The list goes on and on. All of those things have happened to friends and acquaintances during their births.
No thanks. For a low risk pregnancy, I'll take the midwife route every time.
I had your kind of delivery, but in a hospital with a certified nurse midwife. No strangers traipsing through my room (in fact, they sent me home until I was further along in labor), no pitocin, no shouting, no nothing. Baby stayed with me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually live in Nebraska and here’s my take:
1. Nebraska is the only state in the country where it is illegal for CNMs to attend home births. So mothers desiring a homebirth go underground to find lay “midwives” who do home births.
Sorry to take this off topic, but this is exactly why abortions should stay as an available safe and regulated option for women. Otherwise, they would just be forced to go “underground”.
I agree. As long as homebirth CNMs are fully licensed and there are rules in place for how to risk-out patients, and the risks are disclosed to the woman, it's a valid reproductive choice that should be permitted (even though I disagree with it).
But then I think there will still be a core of weirdos who insist on homebirth for known breech, twins, etc., and may go underground (or unassisted!) anyway. But then that's really on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually live in Nebraska and here’s my take:
1. Nebraska is the only state in the country where it is illegal for CNMs to attend home births. So mothers desiring a homebirth go underground to find lay “midwives” who do home births.
Sorry to take this off topic, but this is exactly why abortions should stay as an available safe and regulated option for women. Otherwise, they would just be forced to go “underground”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I^ I am not a homebirther by any stretch, or a natural birther. Epidural all the way for me
But given that the US truly does have abysmal fetal and maternal mortality rates, like truly abysmal, the same argument could apply: anyone who would knowingly take the risk of a hospital birth given the statistics, is taking their baby's life in their hands.
Try to separate emotion. Women make choices that feel right and while it is true some babies would be better off in the hospital birth, the reverse is true as well.
Just stop the name calling and try to LISTEN.
um no ... I'm not listening to utter nonsense. This woman had a breech baby - she had NO business having a home birth.
.
Yes. And that would be all fine and good of this thread had stayed on this woman and this midwife. But it diverged into ALL homebirths.
Many responses has nothing to do with OP.
Are we not allowed to respond to other posts in the thread now?
Anonymous wrote:Oh also:
7. Not too long ago she had another go fund me to try to pay for herself and her entire family to travel to Peru in order for her to study traditional birthing techniques with local indigenous women. Not sure if she ever raised enough to go.
Anonymous wrote:New PP here.
I had a home birth. Low risk pregnancy. Textbook delivery. Attended by 2 midwives and an apprentice. Baby nursed within moments of birth. I was never separated from him. Beautiful healthy kid. Fully vaccinated, by the way.
It was the right choice for me and my baby. I avoided the stress of strangers traipsing through my room disturbing the privacy that is most conducive to labor. I avoided hospital staff watching the clock to see if I met the hospital's policy about how fast my labor should progress, avoided pitocin and starting the cascade of intense contractions that can't be managed without an epidural. I avoided nurses shouting at me to wait to push because the doctor wasn't ready yet. The list goes on and on. All of those things have happened to friends and acquaintances during their births.
No thanks. For a low risk pregnancy, I'll take the midwife route every time.
Anonymous wrote:I actually live in Nebraska and here’s my take:
1. Nebraska is the only state in the country where it is illegal for CNMs to attend home births. So mothers desiring a homebirth go underground to find lay “midwives” who do home births.
Anonymous wrote:The gall of this women to pretend she is a medical professional is stunning. All while killing a baby. I hope they prosecute and win.