Anonymous wrote:The girl sounds like she is being influenced by her parents, and they are slightly delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's her SC petition for cert - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1356/97268/20190423135437781_Adetu%20Petition%20E%20File%20Apr%2023%202019.pdf
She now runs track at Penn, after getting in after a gap year.
Twitter thread with more detail than the LA Times story - https://twitter.com/aaron_leib/status/1129011767168970753
In 2015, a black female Sidwell Friends student and her parents sued the school, saying they were retaliated against for raising concerns about racism. She applied to 13 colleges and was the only student in her class of 126 to not get into any.
So she’s trying to get to the Supreme Court because she’s at Penn and not at Harvard? Her parents should be sanctioned for misusing the court system.
Anonymous wrote:Sidwell is notorious for attempting to limit how many kids apply to each top school. I know several pissed off families who applied places Sidwell assured them were out of reach, whose kids were admitted.
So this girls experience is not unique, and is common enough situation that it is likely not going to win a lawsuit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear that she got special, advantageous treatment from Sidwell. At the time she applied to college, Sidwell limited most students to just nine applications. They have since increased the limit slightly.
How can they limit how many school students apply to?
By not supporting the applications to schools above the limit.
If she applied to 13 schools she created a problem for herself - where does Sidwell push for her - all four ivies she applied to?
But why? Couldn’t they have emphasized the schools where were they wanted them to “push”? The balance of the school wouldn’t get any particular attention.
I don’t understand why the volume was such an issue. Doesn’t seem with in the schools purview to limit how many schools a child can apply to.
Sure it is, the school has to write/send out more recs, and it adds more management for each file. If one person does it, then 128 can do it, and all of the sudden you are dealing with 500 more applications.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear that she got special, advantageous treatment from Sidwell. At the time she applied to college, Sidwell limited most students to just nine applications. They have since increased the limit slightly.
How can they limit how many school students apply to?
By not supporting the applications to schools above the limit.
If she applied to 13 schools she created a problem for herself - where does Sidwell push for her - all four ivies she applied to?
But why? Couldn’t they have emphasized the schools where were they wanted them to “push”? The balance of the school wouldn’t get any particular attention.
I don’t understand why the volume was such an issue. Doesn’t seem with in the schools purview to limit how many schools a child can apply to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear that she got special, advantageous treatment from Sidwell. At the time she applied to college, Sidwell limited most students to just nine applications. They have since increased the limit slightly.
How can they limit how many school students apply to?
By not supporting the applications to schools above the limit.
If she applied to 13 schools she created a problem for herself - where does Sidwell push for her - all four ivies she applied to?
Anonymous wrote:The best part of the brief is when Tom Farquahar supposedly told the parents that all the teachers at the school wanted the family “gone, gone, gone.”
I can see why.
Anonymous wrote:Something stinks here and it doesn't seem like it is the young girl. IMO if she is at Penn now, after a gap year and no substantive changes to her application (like her SAT score didn't increase exponentially), then it certainly seems to me like Sidwell played a negative role in her initial application. More power to her and her family if she pushes forward with her case.
Anonymous wrote:But wouldn’t they have looked up the credentials on someone who was supposed to be their own witness? Nothing against Sidwell in particular, but they could have verified his credentials.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear that she got special, advantageous treatment from Sidwell. At the time she applied to college, Sidwell limited most students to just nine applications. They have since increased the limit slightly.
How can they limit how many school students apply to?