You folks that think she looks her age are NUTS! Her

skin is perfect...not a line around her mouth or eyes.

Her skin is luminous. If she doesn't win, she should

start a skincare line. She would make millions.

LOL she doesn't age in the sense that she's been a grandma forever.

Elizabeth Warren is aging beautifully. I've met her a couple of times and I can assure you she glows in person even with very little makeup. Her skin and her neck are insane. It's tempting to think she's had work done, but up close, it really just looks like good genes to me.

Besides, her youthfulness is beyond her great skin. You can't buy that kind of energy. When she walks into the room her eyes are engaged and sparkling and she has a child-like excitement that's very refreshing. That woman's got a fire in her belly that makes her ageless. And her neck is insane.

Oh, and can we talk about how much she looks like Annette Bening? Or is that for another thread?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.

She has a ton of wrinkles around her eyes and some around her mouth. If this is your idea of good skin, I’m guessing you are extremely old (60+) and look it.

So many mean and negative people in the beauty forum lately. Beauty begins on the inside, darling.

Go start your own forum then because this one is for physical appearances.

Way to increase the bitchiness. Commenting on appearances doesn’t mean you have to be an asshole.

Anonymous wrote:She looks like a typical, every day boomer lady.

. This. Boomer lady with nice, even skin tone. My mom and her friends, look like this. Nothing special. She does not look 38. Get a grip. That's Kristen Bell, Rebel Wilson, Natalie Portman,Jessica Alba!!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm...just looked at her carefully as she was speaking just now. There appears to be a very clear difference in her skin quality between her neck and her chest below it. I'm going with likely good face and neck work.

Stage makeup?

Could be. But her upper chest definitely shows wear and tear.

Everyone’s does. That’s an area most of us forget to care for and put sunblock on, and then it’s at such an angle that it gets all the sun and most of us wear shirts lower than a turtle or a crew so it’s exposed a lot of the time. I’m 38 and I’ve definitely noticed more aging there than on my face!

Not to be too bitchy, but no, not everyone's does. This is, however, one of the big things where you start to see the aging divide in your 30s as it is one of the first places you see the effects of sun damage. I've been seeing dermatologists since I was 11 and cautious about sunscreen and don't have any signs of aging mid-30s, though my sun goddess friends do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.

She has a ton of wrinkles around her eyes and some around her mouth. If this is your idea of good skin, I’m guessing you are extremely old (60+) and look it.

So many mean and negative people in the beauty forum lately. Beauty begins on the inside, darling.

Go start your own forum then because this one is for physical appearances.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.

She has a ton of wrinkles around her eyes and some around her mouth. If this is your idea of good skin, I’m guessing you are extremely old (60+) and look it.

So many mean and negative people in the beauty forum lately. Beauty begins on the inside, darling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm...just looked at her carefully as she was speaking just now. There appears to be a very clear difference in her skin quality between her neck and her chest below it. I'm going with likely good face and neck work.

Stage makeup?

Could be. But her upper chest definitely shows wear and tear.

Everyone’s does. That’s an area most of us forget to care for and put sunblock on, and then it’s at such an angle that it gets all the sun and most of us wear shirts lower than a turtle or a crew so it’s exposed a lot of the time. I’m 38 and I’ve definitely noticed more aging there than on my face!

Anonymous wrote:Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.

She has a ton of wrinkles around her eyes and some around her mouth. If this is your idea of good skin, I’m guessing you are extremely old (60+) and look it.

For the people saying she has no wrinkles are you blind? Look at her eyes in the picture two posts above. And she has the classic downturned jowl lines. She’s nothing special. Y’all are really reaching here.

Anonymous wrote:Literally everyone on this thread. I guarantee you RIGHT NOW that if you are over 30 years old, you have more wrinkles on your face than Warren. Literally don't care how she did it, but it's baller.

You are 100% wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm...just looked at her carefully as she was speaking just now. There appears to be a very clear difference in her skin quality between her neck and her chest below it. I'm going with likely good face and neck work.

Stage makeup?

Could be. But her upper chest definitely shows wear and tear.

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm...just looked at her carefully as she was speaking just now. There appears to be a very clear difference in her skin quality between her neck and her chest below it. I'm going with likely good face and neck work.

Stage makeup?

Hmmm...just looked at her carefully as she was speaking just now. There appears to be a very clear difference in her skin quality between her neck and her chest below it. I'm going with likely good face and neck work.