Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....
Embryos and fetuses aren't people you weirdo.
Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....
"convenience"? No changing your mind with a perspective like that.
![]()
look at the chart earlier. Rarely is it ever for medical reasons - mostly it's for convenience.
You dismiss women as not being fully human.
Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:taking away birth control options and access to abortions is NOT the way to make this cultural change
It is not taking away birth control and contraception options, it is getting people to use them. Abortions could the bevrare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok so if the government can order women to go through pregnancy and L&D against their will, in the name of “saving lives,” it should be able to harvest your body for parts after your death against your will in order to save lives. After all you’ll be dead and it will be of no consequence to you if the government takes your kidneys, liver, eyes, or limbs to save or improve the lives of others. And also everyone should be forced to give blood regularly and to be in a bone marrow databank to be available to donate if the government finds a match. After all, giving blood and bone marrow is a temporary inconvenience and doesn’t harm you. Exceptions can be made for the sick and children, but once you turn 18 you need to register for the blood bank and bone marrow database.
Anti-abortion folks, you call yourself pro-life so are you with me? I would assume you will agree with both these proposals
Red Herring and nothing to do with the Abortion debate. One is talking about saving innocent babies from being killed for convenience, the other is your futile attempt to be an authoritarian.
^^^Would let an innocent child die rather than take a body part from a corpse that didn’t sign a donation form. Shame on you for not caring about babies. Friends of mine lost their baby while waiting too long on a transplant list. She could have been saved by such a law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok so if the government can order women to go through pregnancy and L&D against their will, in the name of “saving lives,” it should be able to harvest your body for parts after your death against your will in order to save lives. After all you’ll be dead and it will be of no consequence to you if the government takes your kidneys, liver, eyes, or limbs to save or improve the lives of others. And also everyone should be forced to give blood regularly and to be in a bone marrow databank to be available to donate if the government finds a match. After all, giving blood and bone marrow is a temporary inconvenience and doesn’t harm you. Exceptions can be made for the sick and children, but once you turn 18 you need to register for the blood bank and bone marrow database.
Anti-abortion folks, you call yourself pro-life so are you with me? I would assume you will agree with both these proposals
Abortion is the death of another body, not your own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortions performed that end a persons life for no other reason than convenience isn't healthcare - change my mind....
"convenience"? No changing your mind with a perspective like that.
![]()
look at the chart earlier. Rarely is it ever for medical reasons - mostly it's for convenience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok so if the government can order women to go through pregnancy and L&D against their will, in the name of “saving lives,” it should be able to harvest your body for parts after your death against your will in order to save lives. After all you’ll be dead and it will be of no consequence to you if the government takes your kidneys, liver, eyes, or limbs to save or improve the lives of others. And also everyone should be forced to give blood regularly and to be in a bone marrow databank to be available to donate if the government finds a match. After all, giving blood and bone marrow is a temporary inconvenience and doesn’t harm you. Exceptions can be made for the sick and children, but once you turn 18 you need to register for the blood bank and bone marrow database.
Anti-abortion folks, you call yourself pro-life so are you with me? I would assume you will agree with both these proposals
Abortion is the death of another body, not your own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok so if the government can order women to go through pregnancy and L&D against their will, in the name of “saving lives,” it should be able to harvest your body for parts after your death against your will in order to save lives. After all you’ll be dead and it will be of no consequence to you if the government takes your kidneys, liver, eyes, or limbs to save or improve the lives of others. And also everyone should be forced to give blood regularly and to be in a bone marrow databank to be available to donate if the government finds a match. After all, giving blood and bone marrow is a temporary inconvenience and doesn’t harm you. Exceptions can be made for the sick and children, but once you turn 18 you need to register for the blood bank and bone marrow database.
Anti-abortion folks, you call yourself pro-life so are you with me? I would assume you will agree with both these proposals
Red Herring and nothing to do with the Abortion debate. One is talking about saving innocent babies from being killed for convenience, the other is your futile attempt to be an authoritarian.
Anonymous wrote:According the the CDC, there were 560,715 live births of African Americans in 2017 while there were 141,825 abortions, or 26% of their population was eliminated.
Anonymous wrote:Ok so if the government can order women to go through pregnancy and L&D against their will, in the name of “saving lives,” it should be able to harvest your body for parts after your death against your will in order to save lives. After all you’ll be dead and it will be of no consequence to you if the government takes your kidneys, liver, eyes, or limbs to save or improve the lives of others. And also everyone should be forced to give blood regularly and to be in a bone marrow databank to be available to donate if the government finds a match. After all, giving blood and bone marrow is a temporary inconvenience and doesn’t harm you. Exceptions can be made for the sick and children, but once you turn 18 you need to register for the blood bank and bone marrow database.
Anti-abortion folks, you call yourself pro-life so are you with me? I would assume you will agree with both these proposals
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
A woman has a right to control her body. Period. It doesn't matter the reason.
Too bad the body control only occurs after the pregnancy.
Abortion is the only way women can seemingly control their bodies.
I like how you let men off the hook so easily.![]()
Unfortunately, I didn’t create humankind. I made no personal decision to build a woman’s body to carry unborn babies, and gift a man with a penis.
I also don’t force women to have sex with men who will not support them in case pregnancy occurs. Women choose who they have sex with. If they have sex with a man who won’t help support a possible pregnancy I can’t prevent that.
However, a man can be forced to take a paternity test and the government will even take money out of his check for child support should he prove to be the father and refuse financial responsibility.
What if the man who impregnated the woman does not work. Suppose, for the next several years the man decides to continue his studies (say complete high school, undergrad, and grad studies). How will the govt. force him to pay child support when he doesn't have any earnings?