Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It baffles me that people who choose not to believe in God and who find nothing redeeming in the word of God (the Bible) choose to denounce the faith of others and ridicule their faith.
What are you so threatened by?
Uhmmm, maybe the fact that you continually do everything you can to ensure our existence is illegal, persecuted, and threatened? Women, gay people, basically everyone but straight white dudes are threatened by your "christianity."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It baffles me that people who choose not to believe in God and who find nothing redeeming in the word of God (the Bible) choose to denounce the faith of others and ridicule their faith.
What are you so threatened by?
Uhmmm, maybe the fact that you continually do everything you can to ensure our existence is illegal, persecuted, and threatened? Women, gay people, basically everyone but straight white dudes are threatened by your "christianity."
Anonymous wrote:It baffles me that people who choose not to believe in God and who find nothing redeeming in the word of God (the Bible) choose to denounce the faith of others and ridicule their faith.
What are you so threatened by?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Context matters, I'm sure. Do you know much about the bible? A list of random quotes doesn't tell anyone much, one way or the other.
Also, about that bee in your bonnet. Some threads, like this one are inviting conversation on a topic to explore various sides of it. The thread that appears to have triggered you was the equivalent of someone saying "Happy Birthday" and you arguing about whether or not it was really happy, and why should it be, and how do we even know you were really born on this day no matter what the birth certificate says, and so on. Some things aren't asking for discussion and debate, like common holiday exclamations and traditional phrases like "happy birthday," "allelujah, he is risen," "merry christmas," "mazel tov," etc. They aren't arguments.
I suspect OP is reacting to the many times when Christians told non-believers not to participate their discussions. OP clearly stated "this thread is for people who believe the bible to be an immoral book." Yet it seems CHristians feel a need to defend their book, knowing their opinion is not wanted.
How does it feel to have your point of view discounted in a public discussion group?
Where are the Christians defending their book?
They aren't engaging with you and your nonsense (aside from me because I cannot help myself).
Trying to talk sense to someone like you is like trying to talk sense to a Trumpster. It cannot be done.
I see you've started two topics tonight. Maybe you should ask Jeff to let you have your own forum?
God bless you, PP.
Now its not enough for us to have our own threads, we need to have our own forum? You can't just not click on the threads that are not for you?
What do you fear from us?
Anonymous wrote:It baffles me that people who choose not to believe in God and who find nothing redeeming in the word of God (the Bible) choose to denounce the faith of others and ridicule their faith.
What are you so threatened by?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO apparently failure to conform with the ideals of 21st century progressivism is the new standard of "morality".
Hint: if the Bible and your ideology are at odds over morality, it is not the Bible that's immoral.
Thinking slavery is immoral is "21st century progressivism"?
Hint: The bible condones slavery. The bible is immoral.
People in the Bible engaged in slavery (as did people in many parts of the world). The fact it is reported in the Bible doesn't make the Bible immoral. I'm glad we have the Bible to see how the ancient civilizations in that part of the world conducted their lives.
It's not "reported" in the bible. It is condoned, and the biblical rules for slavery are listed, as evidenced in the OP.
Please note the rules could have simply been "don't own other people".
Fine. You're too simple-minded to understand this. The Bible doesn't "condone" anything. People in the Bible engaged in this behavior. They acted in an immoral way. The authors are telling this story. You can blame the people who did these things, but the book in which you find the stories isn't in itself immoral. Perhaps too fine a distinction for you.
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
Clear instructions and rules, just like commandments. Not even debatable.
The instructions and rules are immoral, the book in which you find these accounts of instructions and rules is not immoral. Unless you're saying it should be banned because it has bad stuff in it.
Please, please, please stop feeding this dishonest, manipulative troll. There’s no point.
Further explanation: Books with bad stuff in them are not immoral, just the bad stuff in the books is immoral. Ergo, no book, including the Bible is ever immoral -- just the stuff in it.
This rule also applies to books with good stuff in them. Only the good stuff in the book is moral. The books themselves are not moral - not even the Bible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO apparently failure to conform with the ideals of 21st century progressivism is the new standard of "morality".
Hint: if the Bible and your ideology are at odds over morality, it is not the Bible that's immoral.
Thinking slavery is immoral is "21st century progressivism"?
Hint: The bible condones slavery. The bible is immoral.
People in the Bible engaged in slavery (as did people in many parts of the world). The fact it is reported in the Bible doesn't make the Bible immoral. I'm glad we have the Bible to see how the ancient civilizations in that part of the world conducted their lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO apparently failure to conform with the ideals of 21st century progressivism is the new standard of "morality".
Hint: if the Bible and your ideology are at odds over morality, it is not the Bible that's immoral.
Thinking slavery is immoral is "21st century progressivism"?
Hint: The bible condones slavery. The bible is immoral.
People in the Bible engaged in slavery (as did people in many parts of the world). The fact it is reported in the Bible doesn't make the Bible immoral. I'm glad we have the Bible to see how the ancient civilizations in that part of the world conducted their lives.
It's not "reported" in the bible. It is condoned, and the biblical rules for slavery are listed, as evidenced in the OP.
Please note the rules could have simply been "don't own other people".
Fine. You're too simple-minded to understand this. The Bible doesn't "condone" anything. People in the Bible engaged in this behavior. They acted in an immoral way. The authors are telling this story. You can blame the people who did these things, but the book in which you find the stories isn't in itself immoral. Perhaps too fine a distinction for you.
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
Clear instructions and rules, just like commandments. Not even debatable.
The instructions and rules are immoral, the book in which you find these accounts of instructions and rules is not immoral. Unless you're saying it should be banned because it has bad stuff in it.
Please, please, please stop feeding this dishonest, manipulative troll. There’s no point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO apparently failure to conform with the ideals of 21st century progressivism is the new standard of "morality".
Hint: if the Bible and your ideology are at odds over morality, it is not the Bible that's immoral.
Thinking slavery is immoral is "21st century progressivism"?
Hint: The bible condones slavery. The bible is immoral.
People in the Bible engaged in slavery (as did people in many parts of the world). The fact it is reported in the Bible doesn't make the Bible immoral. I'm glad we have the Bible to see how the ancient civilizations in that part of the world conducted their lives.
It's not "reported" in the bible. It is condoned, and the biblical rules for slavery are listed, as evidenced in the OP.
Please note the rules could have simply been "don't own other people".
Fine. You're too simple-minded to understand this. The Bible doesn't "condone" anything. People in the Bible engaged in this behavior. They acted in an immoral way. The authors are telling this story. You can blame the people who did these things, but the book in which you find the stories isn't in itself immoral. Perhaps too fine a distinction for you.
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
Clear instructions and rules, just like commandments. Not even debatable.
The instructions and rules are immoral, the book in which you find these accounts of instructions and rules is not immoral. Unless you're saying it should be banned because it has bad stuff in it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO apparently failure to conform with the ideals of 21st century progressivism is the new standard of "morality".
Hint: if the Bible and your ideology are at odds over morality, it is not the Bible that's immoral.
Thinking slavery is immoral is "21st century progressivism"?
Hint: The bible condones slavery. The bible is immoral.
People in the Bible engaged in slavery (as did people in many parts of the world). The fact it is reported in the Bible doesn't make the Bible immoral. I'm glad we have the Bible to see how the ancient civilizations in that part of the world conducted their lives.
It's not "reported" in the bible. It is condoned, and the biblical rules for slavery are listed, as evidenced in the OP.
Please note the rules could have simply been "don't own other people".
Fine. You're too simple-minded to understand this. The Bible doesn't "condone" anything. People in the Bible engaged in this behavior. They acted in an immoral way. The authors are telling this story. You can blame the people who did these things, but the book in which you find the stories isn't in itself immoral. Perhaps too fine a distinction for you.
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
Clear instructions and rules, just like commandments. Not even debatable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Both of those quotes are from me and you’re deliberately reading them to say the opposite of their face value. Talk about bad faith....
Lol, they are your own words. Right there.