Anonymous wrote:The ECNL/ DA are about getting recruited, here is how every club is doing in recruiting age groups.
FCV
19/18- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
17/16- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
BRYC
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
McLean
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
VDA
19s- Last Place in Conference
17s Last place in Conference
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
Loudoun
19s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
17s Did not qualify for National Playoffs
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
WSVA
19/18- Currently not qualifying for Nationals playoffs
17/16- Last place in Conference
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL/ DA are about getting recruited, here is how every club is doing in recruiting age groups.
FCV
19/18- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
17/16- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
BRYC
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
McLean
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
VDA
19s- Last Place in Conference
17s Last place in Conference
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
Loudoun
19s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
17s Did not qualify for National Playoffs
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
WSVA
19/18- Currently not qualifying for Nationals playoffs
17/16- Last place in Conference
McLean and Bryc older teams (03 and above) were uneffected by the whole ECNL to DA exodus. Thats why they are successful. However, you must look at the current trend (04 and below) to see the true trajectory of a club. Hanging your hat on the old guard is short sighted.
Larry Best is gone from BRYC. Clyde Watson may retire and leave McLean.
Big shoes to fill.
VDA 02 and above never took off for the girls. Their 03 group could have been decent but they lost talent when VDA left DA for ECNL. VDA 04 and below is what you should be watching to determine the trajectory.
Loudoun will always have a FCV problem...unless ECNL wins out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL/ DA are about getting recruited, here is how every club is doing in recruiting age groups.
FCV
19/18- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
17/16- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
BRYC
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
McLean
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
VDA
19s- Last Place in Conference
17s Last place in Conference
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
Loudoun
19s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
17s Did not qualify for National Playoffs
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
WSVA
19/18- Currently not qualifying for Nationals playoffs
17/16- Last place in Conference
McLean and Bryc older teams (03 and above) were uneffected by the whole ECNL to DA exodus. Thats why they are successful. However, you must look at the current trend (04 and below) to see the true trajectory of a club. Hanging your hat on the old guard is short sighted.
Larry Best is gone from BRYC. Clyde Watson may retire and leave McLean.
Big shoes to fill.
VDA 02 and above never took off for the girls. Their 03 group could have been decent but they lost talent when VDA left DA for ECNL. VDA 04 and below is what you should be watching to determine the trajectory.
Loudoun will always have a FCV problem...unless ECNL wins out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL/ DA are about getting recruited, here is how every club is doing in recruiting age groups.
FCV
19/18- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
17/16- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
BRYC
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
McLean
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
VDA
19s- Last Place in Conference
17s Last place in Conference
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
Loudoun
19s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
17s Did not qualify for National Playoffs
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
WSVA
19/18- Currently not qualifying for Nationals playoffs
17/16- Last place in Conference
McLean and Bryc older teams (03 and above) were uneffected by the whole ECNL to DA exodus. Thats why they are successful. However, you must look at the current trend (04 and below) to see the true trajectory of a club. Hanging your hat on the old guard is short sighted.
Larry Best is gone from BRYC. Clyde Watson may retire and leave McLean.
Big shoes to fill.
VDA 02 and above never took off for the girls. Their 03 group could have been decent but they lost talent when VDA left DA for ECNL. VDA 04 and below is what you should be watching to determine the trajectory.
Loudoun will always have a FCV problem...unless ECNL wins out.
Anonymous wrote:The ECNL/ DA are about getting recruited, here is how every club is doing in recruiting age groups.
FCV
19/18- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
17/16- Currently Qualifying for National playoffs
BRYC
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
McLean
19s- Qualified for National Playoffs
17s- Qualified for National Playoffs
16s- Qualified for National Playoffs
VDA
19s- Last Place in Conference
17s Last place in Conference
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
Loudoun
19s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
17s Did not qualify for National Playoffs
16s- Did not Qualify for National Playoffs
WSVA
19/18- Currently not qualifying for Nationals playoffs
17/16- Last place in Conference
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.
BRYC lost their best 04 forward to spirit. They’re losing several others in the age group too. After 03, BRYC is not looking too hot. McLean will always have an influx of players at U16/17. Loudoun seems to struggle across the board.
London’s younger ECNL is doing GREAT.
06's doing good. 07's will be fine also next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.
BRYC lost their best 04 forward to spirit. They’re losing several others in the age group too. After 03, BRYC is not looking too hot. McLean will always have an influx of players at U16/17. Loudoun seems to struggle across the board.
London’s younger ECNL is doing GREAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.
BRYC lost their best 04 forward to spirit. They’re losing several others in the age group too. After 03, BRYC is not looking too hot. McLean will always have an influx of players at U16/17. Loudoun seems to struggle across the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.
BRYC lost their best 04 forward to spirit. They’re losing several others in the age group too. After 03, BRYC is not looking too hot. McLean will always have an influx of players at U16/17. Loudoun seems to struggle across the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crickets. Nowhere
WSVA. Not trolling. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Crickets. Nowhere
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.
BRYC lost their best 04 forward to spirit. They’re losing several others in the age group too. After 03, BRYC is not looking too hot. McLean will always have an influx of players at U16/17. Loudoun seems to struggle across the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.
BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.
Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.