Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gave kid a choice between a Big 3 private and Walls and having chosen Walls is very happy, well challenged and learning to navigate a variety of city life experiences. When you look at it less like a high school and more like a college classroom building - its a different perspective perspective and not for every kid but has worked out well for us…
Does your kid not do any sports?
Anonymous wrote:DC is at a Big3. No. No interest in SWW. It’s no TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Gave kid a choice between a Big 3 private and Walls and having chosen Walls is very happy, well challenged and learning to navigate a variety of city life experiences. When you look at it less like a high school and more like a college classroom building - its a different perspective perspective and not for every kid but has worked out well for us…
Anonymous wrote:SWW decisions will come out Friday 3/29. Question for families already accepted and enrolled at privates: assuming you are accepted at SWW, do you see yourself choosing SWW over the private high school in which you are already enrolled? How would you compare SWW with the area's top private high schools? (You don't need to remind me that SWW is free, I know that.)
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. SWW felt more like a DC office building than a school, but I'm less concerned about the facilities than I am about the general experience, and the seemingly single-minded focus on college admissions and the high stress levels that students report there. The VA private school we're weighing it against has a more balanced approach, but going there would mean less sleep, more travel time, and paying tuition (which may or may not be offset in later years, depending on what happens on the college front). DC is unsure about which school they would prefer. Maybe we should just flip a coin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The sports offerings are very much lacking and are terrible.
So are the facilities.
The facilities are decent.
They are only terrible in the insufficiency of sports facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The sports offerings are very much lacking and are terrible.
So are the facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The sports offerings are very much lacking and are terrible.
So are the facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Debating the same choice. Tuition for HS or college is not a factor. College outcomes are also not a concern since it'll be the same kid and same parental factors in either option and the HS impact will probably be marginal. I get that private is better for teacher attention, class size and facilities.
DC's MS cohort admitted to Walls could all have academically rigorous private HS admits if they wanted to and could afford it, based on the subset who are facing this choice.
My main question is whether a stronger average cohort at Walls creates a difference in experience from a smaller two-speed cohort at rigorous privates where lifers may not be as strong academically on average.
Anonymous wrote:No. The sports offerings are very much lacking and are terrible.