Anonymous wrote:Did not look at this thread but do people refer cock to something else?
Anonymous wrote:Is the C word “can’t?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a disgusting, crass word. Is he very uneducated? I would wonder where on earth he got the idea that is acceptable (or somehow sexy?!) to repeatedly use it to reference a vagina. What a weirdo.
To many of us, it is sexy.
-highly educated woman
Okay. Well don’t use it to others, you sound low class and uneducated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a disgusting, crass word. Is he very uneducated? I would wonder where on earth he got the idea that is acceptable (or somehow sexy?!) to repeatedly use it to reference a vagina. What a weirdo.
To many of us, it is sexy.
-highly educated woman
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a disgusting, crass word. Is he very uneducated? I would wonder where on earth he got the idea that is acceptable (or somehow sexy?!) to repeatedly use it to reference a vagina. What a weirdo.
To many of us, it is sexy.
-highly educated woman
Anonymous wrote:It’s a disgusting, crass word. Is he very uneducated? I would wonder where on earth he got the idea that is acceptable (or somehow sexy?!) to repeatedly use it to reference a vagina. What a weirdo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every definition you see, no matter where you look it up says:
Female genitals
Some definitions stop there. Others mention vulgarity and negative connotations. I don't understand why it is much more offensive than c**k, d**k, PR**k, c***sucker, motherf***er, etc
To use the above example, prick (and d**k) have mostly negative connotations other than their association to the male genitals. I find neither offensive. If a woman asked my to show her my prick so she could taste it, I wouldn't hesitate. I'd be grateful, not offended. So when her boyfriend tells her how great her female genitals taste, he's complimenting her and not using the word in a negative manner. Aren't we grown enough to understand the two meanings and differentiate between them?
Language is not always clear cut. The way it evolves is not necessarily entirely logical. Why is f-g a terrible pajorative while 'qu--r' became a rallying cry and mostly acceptable? There is no logical reason behind that. Why is the n word unspeakable but 'ghetto' still semi on the table? Words evolve to have subtext over generations and different levels of acceptability.
People form opinions to words based on how they encounter them over the course of their life. In America, the c word is a BAD word. It is worse than b--ch. You know that because people aren't throwing the c word around in movies. And generally we accept that just like f-g has a different meaning in the UK, the c word does to. A nuance of language.
It doesn't matter if it makes sense to you because if you start walking around calling women c-words you're going to face some pretty dramatic social consequences. And clearly you would probably turn off american sexual partners. Do with that what you will.
OP as others have said, tell him about it. See what he says, determine your course of action based on his reaction.
Anonymous wrote:Every definition you see, no matter where you look it up says:
Female genitals
Some definitions stop there. Others mention vulgarity and negative connotations. I don't understand why it is much more offensive than c**k, d**k, PR**k, c***sucker, motherf***er, etc
To use the above example, prick (and d**k) have mostly negative connotations other than their association to the male genitals. I find neither offensive. If a woman asked my to show her my prick so she could taste it, I wouldn't hesitate. I'd be grateful, not offended. So when her boyfriend tells her how great her female genitals taste, he's complimenting her and not using the word in a negative manner. Aren't we grown enough to understand the two meanings and differentiate between them?