Anonymous
07/28/2020 02:54
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think older women look much, much better than they did in years past.
J Lo is turning the big 5-0 in a few short months & does not look a day over 35.
Martha Stewart is 67 & is still one of the most beautiful women in her generation.
Paris Hilton + Kim Kardashian do not seem to be in their late 30’s, but they are.
Marilyn Monroe and Lana Turner were true Silver Screen beauties of their time.
Yet neither aged very well.
The two detriments to beauty today are the mass popularity of tattoos and plastic surgery.
And to see a young Kylie Jenner transform her entire face st get eighteen is disheartening.
Plastic surgery good, tattoos bad
Marilyn Monroe died age 36. She never had the chance to age well.
Anonymous
07/28/2020 02:46
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Definitely in the past. Plastic surgery queens have made butt implants and big lips injections so popular. NOthing is real anymore. Women are obsessed with the gym for a bigger ass. Women were actually in proportion back then.
Anonymous
07/28/2020 00:53
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
This is why many men love Black women. We can be in our 40s and 50s and not look a day over 30/35. We age very well.
I’ve noticed that my white female colleagues instantly age 10 years when they have a child. Seen this happen with my own eyes, even to the most attractive looking white women. Not sure why this happens though.
I find that interesting too!
Anonymous
03/03/2019 19:48
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
People like to say this, but it’s unlikely that these older women would look nearly as good without the work. Since we can’t visit an alternate timeline where they are the same age without surgery, we can’t see how much better they look compared to what they would have. We can only compare them to how they looked when they were young.
They are out there and while the minority of older women you can find them. Attractiveness doesn't mean compatibility.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:55
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
This is why many men love Black women. We can be in our 40s and 50s and not look a day over 30/35. We age very well.
I’ve noticed that my white female colleagues instantly age 10 years when they have a child. Seen this happen with my own eyes, even to the most attractive looking white women. Not sure why this happens though.
Yeah sure. ? The “white women age badly” posters have to keep showing up.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:45
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
This is why many men love Black women. We can be in our 40s and 50s and not look a day over 30/35. We age very well.
I’ve noticed that my white female colleagues instantly age 10 years when they have a child. Seen this happen with my own eyes, even to the most attractive looking white women. Not sure why this happens though.
Black hides flaw
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:37
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
This is why many men love Black women. We can be in our 40s and 50s and not look a day over 30/35. We age very well.
I’ve noticed that my white female colleagues instantly age 10 years when they have a child. Seen this happen with my own eyes, even to the most attractive looking white women. Not sure why this happens though.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:34
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
This is a non- answer but there are more ways to improve your looks (cosmetics, plastic surgery, access to working out or knowledge of healthy foods) or destroy your looks (tattoos, bad plastic surgery, access to fast/unhealthy foods) these days.
Some people use recent technology/access/education to improve themselves and some do not. YMMV depending on your addictions, values, priorities.
Some people use recent technology/access/education to improve themselves and some do not. YMMV depending on your addictions, values, priorities.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:25
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
People like to say this, but it’s unlikely that these older women would look nearly as good without the work. Since we can’t visit an alternate timeline where they are the same age without surgery, we can’t see how much better they look compared to what they would have. We can only compare them to how they looked when they were young.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:15
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
The 25-35 year old cohort has to do more now to land or keep a man given the ratios so to me they are making more of an effort.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:07
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
I do miss the natural beauty and not a fan of plastic surgery. Give me a milf without all the fakes (botox, tats, fake t's) and a few wrinkles but accentuated with an athletic body... Yum!
Anonymous
03/03/2019 18:03
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
I was watching a “Bewitched” rerun and it’s amazing how terrible their teeth were.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 17:48
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:I think older women look much, much better than they did in years past.
J Lo is turning the big 5-0 in a few short months & does not look a day over 35.
Martha Stewart is 67 & is still one of the most beautiful women in her generation.
Paris Hilton + Kim Kardashian do not seem to be in their late 30’s, but they are.
Marilyn Monroe and Lana Turner were true Silver Screen beauties of their time.
Yet neither aged very well.
The two detriments to beauty today are the mass popularity of tattoos and plastic surgery.
And to see a young Kylie Jenner transform her entire face st get eighteen is disheartening.
Plastic surgery good, tattoos bad
Anonymous
03/03/2019 17:28
Subject: Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
I think older women look much, much better than they did in years past.
J Lo is turning the big 5-0 in a few short months & does not look a day over 35.
Martha Stewart is 67 & is still one of the most beautiful women in her generation.
Paris Hilton + Kim Kardashian do not seem to be in their late 30’s, but they are.
Marilyn Monroe and Lana Turner were true Silver Screen beauties of their time.
Yet neither aged very well.
The two detriments to beauty today are the mass popularity of tattoos and plastic surgery.
And to see a young Kylie Jenner transform her entire face st get eighteen is disheartening.
J Lo is turning the big 5-0 in a few short months & does not look a day over 35.
Martha Stewart is 67 & is still one of the most beautiful women in her generation.
Paris Hilton + Kim Kardashian do not seem to be in their late 30’s, but they are.
Marilyn Monroe and Lana Turner were true Silver Screen beauties of their time.
Yet neither aged very well.
The two detriments to beauty today are the mass popularity of tattoos and plastic surgery.
And to see a young Kylie Jenner transform her entire face st get eighteen is disheartening.
Anonymous
03/03/2019 16:36
Subject: Re:Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?
Anonymous wrote:I think the aspirational beauty norms are unquestionably higher today. However, it is a double-edge sword because they have ruled out any human, natural signs of aging or even imperfection. Go watch any Abba music videos and remember that these ladies were very much a beauty norm of their time. What do you see? Normal color teeth, some minor crookedness, natural skin texture, with pores and minor wrinkles, gravity-affected breasts and upper arms, some flab on thighs. Yes beautiful but completely human.
Today, none of that can fly. If you aim for aspirational beauty norms today, you cannot have pores. You cannot have breasts pointing down, no matter what size. No part of your body is allowed to jiggle at all. You must have muscles. Your teeth must be perfectly straight and white. You cannot have an ounce of fat anywhere on your body. Any of these would kick you out of the beauty ranks. In other words, you are not allowed to be imperfect or to age.
There is a standard and girls know they'd be held accountable