Anonymous wrote:
DW said I looked sexist wearing just boxer shorts -- and pushing a vacuum cleaner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Earth to Women: we do not want to see a photo of you with those stupid snapchat filters that give a you a dog's nose and ears or whatever.
+100
+ infinity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if I had a FICO score over 800, a crapload of money, and 3 houses (one resident and 2 vacation homes), but had a 5 incher (erect), would I be considered a catch? Handsome and fit also.
Depends on what you can do with that 5 inches. I’ve had 7-8 inches that were boring.
The best sex I ever had was with a guy who had a micro penis. Seriously. Guys with big junk think that's all they need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Earth to Women: we do not want to see a photo of you with those stupid snapchat filters that give a you a dog's nose and ears or whatever.
+100
Anonymous wrote:Earth to Women: we do not want to see a photo of you with those stupid snapchat filters that give a you a dog's nose and ears or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:No woman I know is interested in looking at pictures of male genitalia. The rare curious tween may be an exception but that's child abuse, so I don't recommend it. If you want to interest a woman with photographs, send her a snapshot of your bank balance, or maybe you enjoying hobbies that are of interest to you. Duh!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are always threads generalizing that big guys are terrible in the sack or they think that all they need to do is just show up. I think this stereotype is dumb. Probably the most talented guy I’ve ever dated at going downtown was also huge, and he knew how to use that too. In fact, most of the bigger guys I’ve dated were great at foreplay which I suspect was because the had to be or it wasn’t going to work.
Is it just me who has had this experience?
Anyway, everyone is different and great lovers come in all shapes and sizes.
Where do women seem to find these “huge” guys. I’m guessing the vast majority of women have never seen a large one.
Anonymous wrote:There are always threads generalizing that big guys are terrible in the sack or they think that all they need to do is just show up. I think this stereotype is dumb. Probably the most talented guy I’ve ever dated at going downtown was also huge, and he knew how to use that too. In fact, most of the bigger guys I’ve dated were great at foreplay which I suspect was because the had to be or it wasn’t going to work.
Is it just me who has had this experience?
Anyway, everyone is different and great lovers come in all shapes and sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if I had a FICO score over 800, a crapload of money, and 3 houses (one resident and 2 vacation homes), but had a 5 incher (erect), would I be considered a catch? Handsome and fit also.
Depends on what you can do with that 5 inches. I’ve had 7-8 inches that were boring.
The best sex I ever had was with a guy who had a micro penis. Seriously. Guys with big junk think that's all they need.
+1. I had the same experience. The guy was a wizard with his tongue. Plus, no gagging during bjs, which is always a win.
Also, PP- most guys are 5 inches, or maybe 5 and some change. They all round up to 6. So 5 isn’t that small. Learn how to please a woman and you’re set.