Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is baby sitter married ? Also does your DH try to keep up with her?

She says that she’s married and I’ve met the husband. I always found their marriage and wedding to be odd. That’s another story. DH shows little interest in the kid.

Anonymous wrote:Is baby sitter married ? Also does your DH try to keep up with her?

The girl is 4. She does not look like DH, but like DHs mother, exactly.
The supposed father is a redhead. The child is not a redhead, not a hint of red.
I’m 60, DH is 55. Our child is adopted because of infertility.
I’m not being paranoid. Just wondering about fallout....



First of all red hair is recessive you nitwit.

Second, what irresponsible a$$hole agency allowed a 51 & 56yr old to adopt a child? You two are as old as dirt. Super irresponsible. She is an only child and has parents with one foot in the grave. Must be awesome having a mom in menopause.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP can you please provide more info about the babysitter? Is she still your sitter? Did you keep in touch? How did you meet her child and come up with your unhinged conspiracy theory? Does your husband know you are Facebook stalking old babysitters? What other drama and dirt are you digging up or fabricating from snippets of gossip or online stalking?

She’s not working for us now. She quit full time 6 years ago but came back to do occasional house sitting and so on. Our child is in HS. I saw the child once when she was 4 months or so, once at age 2 or so, twice last year at around three, and several times in the last 6 months.
Our marriage is not in great shape, but not the worst. Nothing so far worth divorcing over. Funny, when we married, DH didn’t want kids. I had to beg to try then beg to adopt. DH likes our child. All I am going on is that look, like his mother’s twin. It’s nauseating. I don’t want to know the truth.

Anonymous wrote:OP you wanted a child so bad that you adopted. Yet the thought of your DH actually fathering one only leads you to be concerned about your own kids inheritance.

Not one concern about the other kid in this mess expressed. Sad all around.

Anonymous wrote:OP can you please provide more info about the babysitter? Is she still your sitter? Did you keep in touch? How did you meet her child and come up with your unhinged conspiracy theory? Does your husband know you are Facebook stalking old babysitters? What other drama and dirt are you digging up or fabricating from snippets of gossip or online stalking?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assumed troll, but I’ll bite as a redhead. All of my 4 siblings are redheads. My parents are both more Auburn. They obviously both carried the redhead gene. None of my 4 children are redheads. I’ve even got a toe head blondie.

Genetics isn’t that simple.

+1

In order to produce a redhead, you need red hair on both sides of the family.

Even then, it's a roll of the dice - both of my parents were redheads, and I'm the only one of their six kids with red hair. Both DH and I are redheads, as are both of our children.

I know a family where the kid has *flaming* red hair, and neither of the parents are redheads. My grandmother had raven-black hair and my grandfather had red hair. Half their kids have red hair, the other half don't. None of their grandchildren have red hair. Recessive genes are weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The girl is 4. She does not look like DH, but like DHs mother, exactly.
The supposed father is a redhead. The child is not a redhead, not a hint of red.
I’m 60, DH is 55. Our child is adopted because of infertility.
I’m not being paranoid. Just wondering about fallout....

First of all red hair is recessive you nitwit.

Second, what irresponsible a$$hole agency allowed a 51 & 56yr old to adopt a child? You two are as old as dirt. Super irresponsible. She is an only child and has parents with one foot in the grave. Must be awesome having a mom in menopause.

Anonymous wrote:The girl is 4. She does not look like DH, but like DHs mother, exactly.
The supposed father is a redhead. The child is not a redhead, not a hint of red.
I’m 60, DH is 55. Our child is adopted because of infertility.
I’m not being paranoid. Just wondering about fallout....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dang, so the kid whos not biologically his is gonna get all his inheritance, not his biological kid???

Honestly, this is what makes me believe that he could have done it. Never accepting the child that we have.

Do your DH doesn't accept his adopted child? He sucks OP. Secretly do the DNA test so you can figure out how to protect your child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assumed troll, but I’ll bite as a redhead. All of my 4 siblings are redheads. My parents are both more Auburn. They obviously both carried the redhead gene. None of my 4 children are redheads. I’ve even got a toe head blondie.

Genetics isn’t that simple.

+1

In order to produce a redhead, you need red hair on both sides of the family.

Even then, it's a roll of the dice - both of my parents were redheads, and I'm the only one of their six kids with red hair. Both DH and I are redheads, as are both of our children.