Gramps must have hit the sherry this afternoon after self calipering his body fat! You’re on a roll saggy balls!
I have always been fit, as a high income 40 year old woman with the resources of time, history, genetics and drive...I SHOULD have a great body and I do. Wealth protects you from saggy boobs (the subtle boob job is great mileage) and Botox and a hint of fillers? No brainer.
Anonymous wrote:You should date women age 22-28. They don't want kids. And also, they are way hotter than 33-45.
I remember being that age. I literally don't know any girl who dated someone who was over 40 (not even over 30!). We wanted someone our age, hot musician kind of a type or anyone who shared our interests that had more to do with youth culture than anything else.
My goal was to call her on making narcissistic post, which I did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should date women age 22-28. They don't want kids. And also, they are way hotter than 33-45.
I remember being that age. I literally don't know any girl who dated someone who was over 40 (not even over 30!). We wanted someone our age, hot musician kind of a type or anyone who shared our interests that had more to do with youth culture than anything else.
Like all women, you think your personal experience can be extrapolated into a universal truth.![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Male, 62. Age range 35-50
I’m 44 and wouldn’t date a 62 yo, no matter how rich, good looking and “young” you may be.
Any guy that old looking to date women that much younger has control issues and is an egomaniac. Have at it asshole. Hope you have deep pockets.
If a woman fit strong body makes you sad I'm okay with that. be sad, gramps.
Oh gosh, I can't imagine why you are single
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Male, 62. Age range 35-50
I’m 44 and wouldn’t date a 62 yo, no matter how rich, good looking and “young” you may be.
Anonymous wrote:You cared enough to respond so far.
The fact you are self-reporting your great body is the saddest thing I have read on DCUM this week, making your report even sadder.
Anonymous wrote:This made me laugh. Who cares? Maybe it works while competing with other men, but women don't care about your "resting heart beat". This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.
I supplied these examples to illustrate the difference between objective data (e.g., my resting heart rate is ___, I wear a DD cup) and subjective data (e.g., I have SUPER body.)
If you had read the PP’s post, most of it was about how she was a college athlete and in great shape. However, stating you are in “great shape” is subjective and most often meaningless when attempting to support a position. However, an example like “my VO2 max is __” is objective. It appears this point went far over your head.
Did you to college? If so, did you learn the fundamental difference between facts (which are objective points of data) and opinions (which are not)? It does not appear so and, sadly, I just wasted my time explaining this to someone who does not understand that there is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:43 year old man, just dating no real range but for relationship 33-45. Even 33 is probably too young if she is single no kids because I don't want more and don't want to waste her time if she does
33-40 is putting you right in the "desperate baby rabies" zone you should avoid. Too much risk of "ooops I'm pregnant, let's get married and keep it".
You should date women age 22-28. They don't want kids. And also, they are way hotter than 33-45.