Anonymous wrote:If the goal is to increase diversity at Deal, the only way that is going to happen is via zoning. We need housing policy changes to add cheaper housing and make it possible for non-wealthy people to live there.
In particular we need to upzone the area, remove the single family housing restriction, and allow apartment buildings and other sorts of dense market rate housing.
Anonymous wrote:If the goal is to increase diversity at Deal, the only way that is going to happen is via zoning. We need housing policy changes to add cheaper housing and make it possible for non-wealthy people to live there.
In particular we need to upzone the area, remove the single family housing restriction, and allow apartment buildings and other sorts of dense market rate housing.
Anonymous wrote:The logical border should be Mass and Idaho but hey, who cares about logic. The far and away richest part of town should be able to find its own MS/HS but they probably wouldn't like that anymore than they liked having a metro stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Banneker's building will be available once they finish their new building at the old Shaw middle school site.
Then the answer is simple! Move SWW there (leveraging Howard) and use SWW as a neighborhood school. It's cost effective, no busing is needed, it provides the most flexibility for future boundary issues, it has the most potential for growth/success, it provides the least disruption/transportation problems, and it likely (because of the neighborhood alone) creates another desirable HS. Between it and Wilson there would be more cumulative OOB spots.
It doesn't solve the upper EOTP problem, which desperately needs a solution if we want that part of the city to continue to thrive but it'd be a win for everybody.
Wilson might start losing some baseball games though...
SWW won’t work as a neighborhood school. No outdoor spsce, no gym and SWW is partnered with GWU. You cant just switch it to another college FFS.
Move your elementary kids to Banneker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Banneker's building will be available once they finish their new building at the old Shaw middle school site.
Then the answer is simple! Move SWW there (leveraging Howard) and use SWW as a neighborhood school. It's cost effective, no busing is needed, it provides the most flexibility for future boundary issues, it has the most potential for growth/success, it provides the least disruption/transportation problems, and it likely (because of the neighborhood alone) creates another desirable HS. Between it and Wilson there would be more cumulative OOB spots.
It doesn't solve the upper EOTP problem, which desperately needs a solution if we want that part of the city to continue to thrive but it'd be a win for everybody.
Wilson might start losing some baseball games though...
Anonymous wrote:Banneker's building will be available once they finish their new building at the old Shaw middle school site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to divide the school into two by moving half to another campus. Maintaining the diversity but splitting it into two groups.
+1000
Anonymous wrote:A likely story, but sure blame the victims of the attempted railroading (while trying to do it again)!
There is no easy answer, but Georgetown, Glover Park, Palisades, Foggy Bottom, West End and Cathedral Heights need their own school. The distance between those places and Tenleytown are the most egregious. They also have the least diversity (school age children only) of all the feeder areas. This is especially important considering the amount of development happening there now and failure to include schools in those development plans is a chicken that will come home to roost.
Options could include turning Stoddert (underused by the neighborhood) into a HS, turning School Without Walls into a neighborhood school, turning Francis-Stevens (lots of DC owned land it can expand into - also underused by the neighborhood) into a HS, or making the Intelsat building a new HS (that'd actually be a great location for SWW and could leverage UDC) would all be workable solutions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just like shipping WOTP kids to a half-empty school EOTP is a non-starter, so is excluding Bancroft (majority Hispanic) and Shepherd (majority AA) from their historic feeder pattern. One solution from another thread was to pull Ward 4 schools -- Lafayette and Shepherd -- into another middle school together as a compromise where families both east and west of the park feel the "pain" of a new feeder system. A solution like that where no "side" wins is the only thing that's politically viable. The people who bitch about EOTP hipsters or middle-class black families using YOUR schools are sadly bitter and
obviously new to how DC works.
Hahaha, of course. The agenda has been revealed. This is as absurd as the idea floated by Much parents that since Lafyette had trailers in place they should just move Murch there rather than sully the neighborhood during construction.
Nevertheless, I must obligatorily point out that Lafayette has been part of Deal/Wilson for over 50 years, it's physical location is far closer to those schools than any other option, the road and transportation networks are aligned in that direction, and it's only a part of ward 4 for political gerrymandering reasons.