Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real question should be why are we still putting the burden on the wife to defend/or not defend her husband's affair? It's gross. I'm all for reporters asking Bill about it, like Craig Melvin did a few months ago, but Hillary didn't have the affair.

Hello. Hillary DEFENDED her RAPIST husband and STAYED married to the criminal.

Now, THAT'S gross.

So the woman is responsible for the man’s actions? I bet you blame rape victims for having a beer at a party too.

DP

To the point she enables yes. In her case though I hold her a great deal more responsible for her words and actions toward those on the other side of this issue.

Exactly what was objectionable about asking why the various women's groups and movements, like metoo, are silent on her comments?

I'm a fan of Monica Hesse:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-enduring-bill-clinton-dilemma/2018/10/15/6507caee-d092-11e8-8c22-fa2ef74bd6d6_story.html?utm_term=.6af6514f63ca

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a married executive has an affair with a 20 something willing staffer he will usually be terminated for inappropriate behavior.

Except if the boss is a democrat. Then it is okay.

Remember they are the party of the double standard.

Uh, Harvey Weinstein? Nice try, though.

Harvey's best friends with Hillary and Michelle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real question should be why are we still putting the burden on the wife to defend/or not defend her husband's affair? It's gross. I'm all for reporters asking Bill about it, like Craig Melvin did a few months ago, but Hillary didn't have the affair.

Hello. Hillary DEFENDED her RAPIST husband and STAYED married to the criminal.

Now, THAT'S gross.

So the woman is responsible for the man’s actions? I bet you blame rape victims for having a beer at a party too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton doesn’t appear to understand “abuse of power.” Her being an adult has nothing to do with it.
But, Hillary has proved clueless on a lot of things, so that is no surprise.

+1,000

Can grown women age 18-39 *ever* not be under the thumb of “power”? Because a lot of my girlfriends going back to undergrad *eagerly* and aggressively pursued their bosses for the thrill, for career benefits, and/or because of attraction.

You should find some better girlfriends.

Or maybe you should stop considering women to always be the victims. Adult women are perfectly capable of choosing consensual sexual partners, whether that person is their supervisor or not.
-DP

Or maybe you should be more familiar with harassment laws. The issue is not what your girlfriends are capable of choosing. Sexual harassment in the workplace has an OBJECTIVE and subjective element. Even if your friends subjectively thought it was ok to sleep with the boss, objectively, it could be viewed as a power imbalance and harassment (to you or to others, depending on the facts). It is also a huge liability to any company. Further, just b/c your friends are ok with the relationship at one point, doesn't mean that wouldn't change. It happens. And not always for the better.

So, it's not about being victims. It's about liability. It's about keeping sex out of the office lace.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a married executive has an affair with a 20 something willing staffer he will usually be terminated for inappropriate behavior.

Except if the boss is a democrat. Then it is okay.

Remember they are the party of the double standard.

Uh, Harvey Weinstein? Nice try, though.

Anonymous wrote:The real question should be why are we still putting the burden on the wife to defend/or not defend her husband's affair? It's gross. I'm all for reporters asking Bill about it, like Craig Melvin did a few months ago, but Hillary didn't have the affair.

Hello. Hillary DEFENDED her RAPIST husband and STAYED married to the criminal.

Now, THAT'S gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton doesn’t appear to understand “abuse of power.” Her being an adult has nothing to do with it.
But, Hillary has proved clueless on a lot of things, so that is no surprise.

+1,000

Can grown women age 18-39 *ever* not be under the thumb of “power”? Because a lot of my girlfriends going back to undergrad *eagerly* and aggressively pursued their bosses for the thrill, for career benefits, and/or because of attraction.

You should find some better girlfriends.

Or maybe you should stop considering women to always be the victims. Adult women are perfectly capable of choosing consensual sexual partners, whether that person is their supervisor or not.
-DP

The real question should be why are we still putting the burden on the wife to defend/or not defend her husband's affair? It's gross. I'm all for reporters asking Bill about it, like Craig Melvin did a few months ago, but Hillary didn't have the affair.

Anonymous wrote:“She was an adult,” Clinton said, before quickly turning the conversation to President Trump.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-news-bill-hillary-clinton-monica-lewinsky-20181014-story.html

The age of consent for sex in Wash., DC is 16 so she was well beyond 16. Even if itvwas 22, she was an adult who could legally enter into binding contracts.

Should Trump have had affairs with women a fraction of his age? As long as they were above age of consent, it was legal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton doesn’t appear to understand “abuse of power.” Her being an adult has nothing to do with it.
But, Hillary has proved clueless on a lot of things, so that is no surprise.

+1,000

Can grown women age 18-39 *ever* not be under the thumb of “power”? Because a lot of my girlfriends going back to undergrad *eagerly* and aggressively pursued their bosses for the thrill, for career benefits, and/or because of attraction.

You should find some better girlfriends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton doesn’t appear to understand “abuse of power.” Her being an adult has nothing to do with it.
But, Hillary has proved clueless on a lot of things, so that is no surprise.

+1,000

Can grown women age 18-39 *ever* not be under the thumb of “power”? Because a lot of my girlfriends going back to undergrad *eagerly* and aggressively pursued their bosses for the thrill, for career benefits, and/or because of attraction.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was proud of Hillary.

Ready to support her again.

We can break the glass ceiling- together.

ummmm.... by her statements, she is cementing the glass ceiling and preventing women for overcoming sexual harassment.

Good God you're blind, PP.

Welcome to dcum!

And yet the various women's groups, metoo movement, etc. are strangely silent about her comments that fly in the face of what they stand against.