Anonymous wrote:I know one girl who transferred from UVA to tech. She did not like UVA's social atmosphere. She liked tech much better socially.
Anonymous wrote:idk how many transfers per year Duke accepts, but I'd put money on most of them being from UVA and UNC.
Anonymous wrote:With a high retention rate, one would expect to see a low number of transfers accepted, because there are fewer departures to replace. But UVA actually enrolls more transfers as a percentage of undergraduate enrollment than Virginia Tech. Transfers to VT averaged 3.8% of undergraduate enrollment per year vs. 4.4% per year over the last 4 years. You can see transfer and enrollment data on the SCHEV site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a kid who transferred from UVA to Brown after their first year. Their parents were both Ivy alums, though, so I assume that they didn't get in to an Ivy in the first go-around and were using UVA as a stepping stone to transfer into one.
This. I don't think the posters on this thread realize that transferring out often means transferring to a better school, not necessarily a lesser one.
We're talking about UVA's high retention rate. Retention rate and transfer rate are two different things. Graduation rate is the percentage of a school’s first-time, first-year undergraduate students who complete their program within 150% of the published time for the program. For example, for a four-year degree program, entering students who complete within six years are counted as graduates.
Retention rate is the percentage of a school’s first-time, first-year undergraduate students who continue at that school the next year. For example, a student who studies full-time in the fall semester and keeps on studying in the program in the next fall semester is counted in this rate.
Transfer rate is the percentage of a school’s first-time, first-year undergraduate students who transfer to another college within 150% of the published time for the program. For example, a student who is in a four-year degree program is counted as a transfer if the student goes to another college within six years.
Anonymous wrote:UVA ranked no. 1 for student satisfaction in the USA. I believe the retention figures. DC is blissfully happy there and knows of only one student from his class who left and that was due to grades and class failure. https://www.bestcolleges.com/features/high-student-satisfaction/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, troll, I'll bite.
First, a "smart" UVA student is redundant. They're all smart, or they wouldn't have gotten in.
Second, UVA has one of the highest first-year retention rates in the country: 97 percent, rivaling the Ivy League. So the overwhelming majority of UVA students do not transfer.
Having said that, I know of two students over the years who transferred to VCU for its superior fine arts program. There's a lot of pressure on top NOVA high school students to choose UVA or William and Mary simply because they can get it, when neither is necessarily the best school for their interests.
Well said. So many parents assume if your child gets into one of these schools, they *must* go there. It's ridiculous. There are so many great schools out there, many of which are a better fit.
So many NOVA parents are in the donut hole for financial aid. We can afford WM full pay. We can not afford a $75,000/ year LAC. And we will not qualify for merit. And many/ most higher ranked colleges don’t do merit. It would be great to be able to spend $600,000 over 6 years for kids educations. But as it is, WM will come out at close to $300,000. I’m glad we can afford that.
Cost is a reality for people in a high COL area who are looking at $34k a year for WM, or less for UVA vs $75k for an Ivy. And I do not want my kid to graduate with debt.
You live in a bubble. Yes. It’s because they can get in— and UMC parents can still afford them.
You're missing the point, completely, which is that there are other affordable in state schools that might be better fits even if their overall ranking isn't as high. Like forcing a kid to go to UVA instead of VCU even though the kid wants fine arts . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, troll, I'll bite.
First, a "smart" UVA student is redundant. They're all smart, or they wouldn't have gotten in.
Second, UVA has one of the highest first-year retention rates in the country: 97 percent, rivaling the Ivy League. So the overwhelming majority of UVA students do not transfer.
Having said that, I know of two students over the years who transferred to VCU for its superior fine arts program. There's a lot of pressure on top NOVA high school students to choose UVA or William and Mary simply because they can get it, when neither is necessarily the best school for their interests.
Well said. So many parents assume if your child gets into one of these schools, they *must* go there. It's ridiculous. There are so many great schools out there, many of which are a better fit.
So many NOVA parents are in the donut hole for financial aid. We can afford WM full pay. We can not afford a $75,000/ year LAC. And we will not qualify for merit. And many/ most higher ranked colleges don’t do merit. It would be great to be able to spend $600,000 over 6 years for kids educations. But as it is, WM will come out at close to $300,000. I’m glad we can afford that.
Cost is a reality for people in a high COL area who are looking at $34k a year for WM, or less for UVA vs $75k for an Ivy. And I do not want my kid to graduate with debt.
You live in a bubble. Yes. It’s because they can get in— and UMC parents can still afford them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a kid who transferred from UVA to Brown after their first year. Their parents were both Ivy alums, though, so I assume that they didn't get in to an Ivy in the first go-around and were using UVA as a stepping stone to transfer into one.
This. I don't think the posters on this thread realize that transferring out often means transferring to a better school, not necessarily a lesser one.
Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of Trump conspiracy theory lunatics. Schools are required to report data like retention rates to the federal government for various programs under penalty of law. US News and other rating organizations audit what’s reported to them through these reports. You can’t just make the stuff up. Why do you think schools report making mistakes? They know they’re going to get caught.
Sometimes I wonder about the level of education and sophistication on DCUM.