Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are doing their part. They work hard, so I feel guilty that the adults are failing them .
You can't have people teaching advanced classes that don't have the background to teach the content. No one should be teaching high school math without either an undergraduate or graduate degree in math or a related subject (physics etc.). Having subject matter expertise is the only way that a teacher can be a competent teacher. You can't have a surface understanding of a topic to be teaching at the high school level or just reading the answer key. This is part of the reason that education programs in this country are being lambasted. Education pedagogy is fine, but subject matter expertise and the ability to communicate with teens is very important. We literally had a teacher a few years back tell parents that he would be learning the material (AP Calc) along with the students. Completely UNACCEPTABLE!
This is all true and what I find extremely frustrating. Even if the HS level course is appropriately taught as a handful of problem solving techniques, the teacher needs to be modeling more advanced skills like stating definitions and theorems concisely, because mimesis is a large part of how students eventually learn these skills. This is where HS is really loosing ground and why some of these classes do more harm than good (and really these types of omissions start in MS level classes).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are doing their part. They work hard, so I feel guilty that the adults are failing them .
You can't have people teaching advanced classes that don't have the background to teach the content. No one should be teaching high school math without either an undergraduate or graduate degree in math or a related subject (physics etc.). Having subject matter expertise is the only way that a teacher can be a competent teacher. You can't have a surface understanding of a topic to be teaching at the high school level or just reading the answer key. This is part of the reason that education programs in this country are being lambasted. Education pedagogy is fine, but subject matter expertise and the ability to communicate with teens is very important. We literally had a teacher a few years back tell parents that he would be learning the material (AP Calc) along with the students. Completely UNACCEPTABLE!
Anonymous wrote:My kids are doing their part. They work hard, so I feel guilty that the adults are failing them .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Friends daughter did honors geometry in 8th grade at Cabin John. Honors algebra 2 at Churchill in 9th grade and so on. All As in those classes. SAT scored 575 math. Not pretty. Parents disappointed
Yes, unfortunately a very similar situation for us. It would be great if they can just clean house in the math department.
Anonymous wrote:Friends daughter did honors geometry in 8th grade at Cabin John. Honors algebra 2 at Churchill in 9th grade and so on. All As in those classes. SAT scored 575 math. Not pretty. Parents disappointed
Anonymous wrote:Friends daughter did honors geometry in 8th grade at Cabin John. Honors algebra 2 at Churchill in 9th grade and so on. All As in those classes. SAT scored 575 math. Not pretty. Parents disappointed
Anonymous wrote:Friends daughter did honors geometry in 8th grade at Cabin John. Honors algebra 2 at Churchill in 9th grade and so on. All As in those classes. SAT scored 575 math. Not pretty. Parents disappointed
Anonymous wrote:Another question is why isn't Heckert going into math classes and doing classroom observations?
Anonymous wrote:It might be that my kids aren't that smart, but I noticed that my friends kids in other HSs do honors math classes and always get As. My kids who I assumed were of the same intelligence (as I said, I might be wrong), struggle to get Bs at Churchill. Also, it is the only class that they struggle in.