Anonymous wrote:I really don't understand why everyone is jumping all over OP. She took a "hit" in her career so that HE could be the breadwinner, and now with one toddler and another on the way, which will only increase expenses, he wants to duck out. I'd be unhappy too.
That said, the legal field isn't just big law or bust. DH and I are lawyers and make combined salary that is more than fed/nonprofit ($350K). We see our kids every morning and night for quality time. I work a lot, but it's flexible. Don't let resentment build. Work on adjusting your "life plan" for yourself first, then communicate with him what the 1 year, 5 year plan should look like so he is satisfied and you are satisfied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP you're not reading OP's post very well. She took a less demanding job so she could pick up more on the home front. I'm really surprised everyone is dogging on OP. I think she went out of her way to say she wants her DH to be happy but is feeling betrayed. Is that really so unusual? Maybe everyone has their back up because OP used the word "bargain." She meant "compromise." Too many posters talking about OP needing to compromise based on what DH wants. What about DH compromising based on what OP wants? That should be part of a healthy marriage too.
Are you being deliberately obtuse? She scaled back her career before having kids, to a non-profit job at that.
Why she didn’t go in-house, Fed, or at least wait till actually pregnant (and biglaw has pretty good maternity leave I think) is telling as to how they arrived at this ‘bargain’.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP you're not reading OP's post very well. She took a less demanding job so she could pick up more on the home front. I'm really surprised everyone is dogging on OP. I think she went out of her way to say she wants her DH to be happy but is feeling betrayed. Is that really so unusual? Maybe everyone has their back up because OP used the word "bargain." She meant "compromise." Too many posters talking about OP needing to compromise based on what DH wants. What about DH compromising based on what OP wants? That should be part of a healthy marriage too.
Are you being deliberately obtuse? She scaled back her career before having kids, to a non-profit job at that.
Why she didn’t go in-house, Fed, or at least wait till actually pregnant (and biglaw has pretty good maternity leave I think) is telling as to how they arrived at this ‘bargain’.
Anonymous wrote:OP, tell him you will take the kids away if he cuts back. There is no way he can afford a divorce at this point in his career. He will never think of leaving Buglaw again and in a year orso will be past this crisis and will actually thank you.
Anonymous wrote:PP you're not reading OP's post very well. She took a less demanding job so she could pick up more on the home front. I'm really surprised everyone is dogging on OP. I think she went out of her way to say she wants her DH to be happy but is feeling betrayed. Is that really so unusual? Maybe everyone has their back up because OP used the word "bargain." She meant "compromise." Too many posters talking about OP needing to compromise based on what DH wants. What about DH compromising based on what OP wants? That should be part of a healthy marriage too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can he look into joining another firm as a non equity partner? My BFF does this. She works a 2/3 schedule (which is still 40-50 hrs), isn’t responsible for bringing in business and still makes 500k +. I don’t know her exact salary but I know it is over 500j and that one year she made over 700k.
This sounds like a unicorn job. How did she find this?
+1. Those numbers sound very high for a part time non-equity partner. Are you sure those are right?
I’m not the PP but I always assumed non equity partners were making at least 500k. The equity ones make 7 figures easily right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can he look into joining another firm as a non equity partner? My BFF does this. She works a 2/3 schedule (which is still 40-50 hrs), isn’t responsible for bringing in business and still makes 500k +. I don’t know her exact salary but I know it is over 500j and that one year she made over 700k.
This sounds like a unicorn job. How did she find this?
+1. Those numbers sound very high for a part time non-equity partner. Are you sure those are right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like your main concern is the drop in income and lifestyle adjustments that will need to happen. Understandable, but that's not really fair to the person who is burdened with maintaining that. I think you need to be as supportive as possible of what your DH wants to do about his career, and find a way as a couple to make that happen for him - just as you'd want him to support your career choices. Sit down together and go over the budget to figure out how things will look, and discuss your concerns with him. But at the end of the day, you really need to trust that he'll make the decision that's best for everyone. Otherwise there's going to be a lot of resentment between you two.
I also don't think you can expect him to handle it the same way you would if you were the one who had stayed in BigLaw. And like you said, you really DON'T know how you'd be feeling at this point in your career had you stayed, so that line of thinking is totally irrelevant.
If you are really concerned about the money, go back to a firm or get a higher paying job yourself.
OP here. Thank you for some actual advice. These are helpful suggestions. As I hope was clear in my post, I do want to support him and do want him to be less stressed and happier. I'm just trying to figure out how to re-jigger the way we save because I want to be prudent about college savings, retirement, etc. and admittedly it was a lot easier to do that with a sky-high HHI.
I'll ignore the other trolls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can he look into joining another firm as a non equity partner? My BFF does this. She works a 2/3 schedule (which is still 40-50 hrs), isn’t responsible for bringing in business and still makes 500k +. I don’t know her exact salary but I know it is over 500j and that one year she made over 700k.
This sounds like a unicorn job. How did she find this?
Anonymous wrote:I’m the breadwinner and yearn for less stress... but we made a deal and I have to live with it. But I contemplate divorce so I can get out of this hell I’ve dug myself into.
OP, is that what you want? To one day come home and he wants a divorce because it is too much?
Anonymous wrote:PP you're not reading OP's post very well. She took a less demanding job so she could pick up more on the home front. I'm really surprised everyone is dogging on OP. I think she went out of her way to say she wants her DH to be happy but is feeling betrayed. Is that really so unusual? Maybe everyone has their back up because OP used the word "bargain." She meant "compromise." Too many posters talking about OP needing to compromise based on what DH wants. What about DH compromising based on what OP wants? That should be part of a healthy marriage too.