Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone considered that maybe the BIL didn’t want the kids in the wedding? Maybe he did this to please OP?
I would have certainly assumed that the kids were only in the wedding to please either OP or MIL, yes. Including literally one set of kids while excluding everyone else's children does seem to indicate that the couple are compromising their desire to have a kid-free wedding for someone.
OP also had the balls to specifically ask if her kids could be included in the reception. After they were told "no kids." So my bet is you're right - this was BIL's compromise to keep OP happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone considered that maybe the BIL didn’t want the kids in the wedding? Maybe he did this to please OP?
I would have certainly assumed that the kids were only in the wedding to please either OP or MIL, yes. Including literally one set of kids while excluding everyone else's children does seem to indicate that the couple are compromising their desire to have a kid-free wedding for someone.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone considered that maybe the BIL didn’t want the kids in the wedding? Maybe he did this to please OP?
Anonymous wrote:It is truly strange that some people decide that because they have kids, they are entitled to change the parameters of an invitation.
Your only options are to accept or decline. The end.
.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?
Probably. They also may not feel like having a kid friendly menu, censoring off color jokes, or indulging children who wish to insert themselves into adult conversations.
The oldest is 10, right? I have a child that age. You could seriously take him to the Met Gala. He would be horrified to eat chicken fingers at a proper dinner. It's not anything like bringing a 3 yo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would just bring my kids down at some point when the bride and groom are too tied up with other guests to notice. Let them dance and have a piece of cake and bring them back upstairs. Its bull to exclude members of the wedding party.
At my wedding, my mother-in-law ditched the agreed upon color scheme for her dress so she would stand out from my mother and DH's step mother.
Mt SIL took her kids who were my flower girl and ring bearer and left for the reception because she didn't feel like 4 and 6 year olds were appropriate wedding guests. She self selected. They were invited. Other kids were there including BIL's 2 year old.
People do what they want and apologize later, or not. And, life goes on.
To be honest I think this is what I'd do. Let them come have a look around and some cake. It's a resort, there will be guests flowing in and out.

Anonymous wrote:I would purposely throw family focused kids birthday parties for the next year and invite everyone exceptmthe bride and groom and feign forgetfulness or the excuse thst these are kid friendly events and they either have no kids or we didn't thinknthrybwould be interested. You have to go to the wedding now because you have already rsvp'd. Ok would get the kids out quickly after the ceremony so they don't have to participate on pictures. I'm petty.