RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:RantingSoccerDad wrote:
No doubt -- Barca's style is terrific. Rondos are great teaching tools, no matter what a U.S. Soccer bureaucrat says. But keep expectations reasonable. A so-so athlete or someone with mediocre coordination can do 10,000 hours of rondos and still not be an effective soccer player.
U.S. Soccer is negative about Rondos? I had not heard that. Please give more background on this. I thought everyone had bought into Rondos and was surprised that they were not utilized much by our team this past year.
DC's own Charles Boehm has done a lot of reporting on this:
https://ussoccerplayers.com/2018/05/us-soccer-coaching-education-and-the-strange-case-of-the-war-on-rondos.html
https://www.soccerwire.com/news/other/coaching/soccerwire-qa-going-deep-on-coaching-ed-with-ussfs-tschan-russell/
The issue is that rondos are not "directional" and therefore aren't "reality-based."
I'm not an expert on coaching technique, but I think the USSF position flunks the "duh" test ...
1. Players need to develop a first touch and learn to receive passes. Duh. No coaching expertise needed to know that.
2. Effective passes may go backwards as well as forwards. Duh, again.
RantingSoccerDad wrote:
No doubt -- Barca's style is terrific. Rondos are great teaching tools, no matter what a U.S. Soccer bureaucrat says. But keep expectations reasonable. A so-so athlete or someone with mediocre coordination can do 10,000 hours of rondos and still not be an effective soccer player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Barca Academy seems to be doing well enough in NPL for their first year:
http://www.nyclubsoccerleague.com/html/npl/current/standing-list.asp
It is early to use this to gauge their effectiveness of course, any maybe it's different in NY, but NPL is not exactly a high level league here.
Isn't that moving the goal posts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Barca Academy seems to be doing well enough in NPL for their first year:
http://www.nyclubsoccerleague.com/html/npl/current/standing-list.asp
It is early to use this to gauge their effectiveness of course, any maybe it's different in NY, but NPL is not exactly a high level league here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Barca Academy seems to be doing well enough in NPL for their first year:
http://www.nyclubsoccerleague.com/html/npl/current/standing-list.asp
It is early to use this to gauge their effectiveness of course, any maybe it's different in NY, but NPL is not exactly a high level league here.
Anonymous wrote:The NY Barca Academy seems to be doing well enough in NPL for their first year:
http://www.nyclubsoccerleague.com/html/npl/current/standing-list.asp
Anonymous wrote:^ he seems to know absolutely nothing about the soccer scene or history of soccer in the area, but fancies himself an expert.
Anonymous wrote:^ he seems to know absolutely nothing about the soccer scene or history of soccer in the area, but fancies himself an expert.
RantingSoccerDad wrote:Wow -- so much defensive hostility here! You'd think this was the GDA vs. ECNL smackdown! (No, MY program that charges $5,000/year is better -- YOU'RE wasting your money!)
I'm not talking about U9 here. I'm talking kids at older age groups.
And GotSoccer or not, these FCB kids were in the bracket in which they belonged. They were even with, not better than, some teams that can't string together passes to save their lives and don't have the athleticism of an Arlington Red team.
At U9, OK. Still plenty of time to develop. Even at U12, you don't want to give up on individuals.
But if you're playing at this level at U12, there are a handful of possibilities:
1. Your kid just started soccer of any kind this year.
2. The coaching isn't that great.
3. The player just doesn't have the coordination or the athleticism to do any better, no matter how great the coaching is. (Bear in mind -- this could be because of a growth spurt, and the player's coordination or athleticism could improve.)
If it's 2 or 3, you may have a tough time justifying the cost.
That's certainly not just an FCB thing. Rec leagues at U14 and higher are full of kids who have come back from travel. They may be pretty good, but they may be better at something else, so training to play soccer isn't as high a priority any more.
And let's make no mistake -- there are a lot of coaches out there who will swear to you that their methods will help your kid catch up eventually. Oh, you might be NCSL Division 9 *now*, at U12, but by the time he's U16, he'll be Division 3. (Yeah. Because NCSL has fewer divisions at that age.)
*Some* of them are right. Some kids really might make a giant leap when they settle into their bodies. But then some coaches have a lot of rea$on$ not to tell you the truth about your kid's aptitude and ceiling.
I'm not telling you to quit FCB or any other program. Barcelona is one of my two favorite clubs in the world. (The other is Liverpool.) I hope this works. But I know Barcelona isn't above milking cash cows.
My goal in my work is just to help parents get information, at least to figure out the questions they should be asking.
If you've seen dozens of clubs training, and you have good reason to think FCB is doing something the other clubs aren't, great. I'd love to hear what they're doing, but I'd understand if it's proprietary.
And it's a new program. If we see U14s and U16s playing beautiful, effective soccer, well, there's your proof. If they're the same kids who are currently battling big, mediocre clubs' D teams with little success, then they're the best coaches in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, RantingSoccerDad. Or should I say, Mr. Cordeiro?
I still would love to know his credentials that make him THE authority to advise parents. LMAOF.
Geez, go to his site, https://rantingsoccerdad.com/