Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it was (I'm also somewhat conservative). But so was Samantha Bee's. Honestly, I don't see one as less awful than the other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
I'm pretty conservative and think Roseanne's comment was beyond disgusting and reprehensible.
Yes, it was (I'm also somewhat conservative). But so was Samantha Bee's. Honestly, I don't see one as less awful than the other.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
No, the standard for racism is different than the standard for being offensive. I keep holding out hope that conservatives will eventually figure this out, but I'm continually let down.
Maybe you could help us by defining each offensive circumstance and where it ranks, starting with the worst first. You've got racism. Whites vs. blacks, Latinos, Chinese, etc. Then the opposite where the minorities defame the whites. Next misogamy. Here woman vs. woman, man vs. woman. After that homophobic disparaging, from both straight males and straight females. Then transgender bashing, how does that rank in the list? Finally, explain how each remark is either a joke or slanderous based upon who says it, e.g. an entertainer/comedian/politician/company employee/service worker of the following classes, male or female, black or white, etc.
I am not very versed in the degree of outrage that each remark warrants in any given circumstance so please help me better understand. Also, for each let me know if it is an offense worth of firing, or if an apology or saying it was simply a joke would serve to make it go away
Thanks for your help.
If you are interested in lists, then you should make your own. You can tell us what type of violent imagery regarding presidents is acceptable and which isn't. Based on observation, holding a fake severed head gets you kicked off your show but saying Obama and Hillary should be hanged gets you invited to the White House. Similarly, it appears that mocking grabbing a woman's breasts requires for you to resign from the Senate, but actually grabbing a woman's genitals gets you elected president. Lying about sex gets you impeached if you are a Democrat, but lying about paying off a porn star doesn't if you are a Republican. It would obviously take someone of your caliber to explain all of this, so please get started.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
I'm pretty conservative and think Roseanne's comment was beyond disgusting and reprehensible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Jeff, please delete this thread. This poster is trying to normalize what Roseanne tweeted and to soft pedal it by claiming that she finds Valerie Jarrett pretty even though it's true she looks like Planet of the Apes.
We need to be better than this.
I like Trevor Noah's comment that what Rosanne tweeted is "shit in your pants racism". Everyone can smell it, everyone can see it, and nobody wants to help you clean it up.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
No, the standard for racism is different than the standard for being offensive. I keep holding out hope that conservatives will eventually figure this out, but I'm continually let down.
Maybe you could help us by defining each offensive circumstance and where it ranks, starting with the worst first. You've got racism. Whites vs. blacks, Latinos, Chinese, etc. Then the opposite where the minorities defame the whites. Next misogamy. Here woman vs. woman, man vs. woman. After that homophobic disparaging, from both straight males and straight females. Then transgender bashing, how does that rank in the list? Finally, explain how each remark is either a joke or slanderous based upon who says it, e.g. an entertainer/comedian/politician/company employee/service worker of the following classes, male or female, black or white, etc.
I am not very versed in the degree of outrage that each remark warrants in any given circumstance so please help me better understand. Also, for each let me know if it is an offense worth of firing, or if an apology or saying it was simply a joke would serve to make it go away
Thanks for your help.
Anonymous wrote:
Jeff, please delete this thread. This poster is trying to normalize what Roseanne tweeted and to soft pedal it by claiming that she finds Valerie Jarrett pretty even though it's true she looks like Planet of the Apes.
We need to be better than this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But she isn't white.
Doesn't matter. What matters is if Roseanne thought she was. It is very different comparing a white person to an ape than a black person, although both are of course terrible. I mean, liberals here compare the president of the US to an "orange turd," but we wouldn't have been able to compare Obama to a "constipated black turd."
And before you start in with "it's fake orange tan" stuff, it still is a stupid thing to criticize Trump about. It shows a fixation on color - natural or fake - by people who proclaim that color should be irrelevant.
This is why you support Trump. To suggest that insulting someone is the same as a blatant racist comments says all we need to know about you. Trump said horrible things about Obama. They were racist also!
Given our history of slavery and racism, the fact that you would even write this is incredible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But she isn't white.
Doesn't matter. What matters is if Roseanne thought she was. It is very different comparing a white person to an ape than a black person, although both are of course terrible. I mean, liberals here compare the president of the US to an "orange turd," but we wouldn't have been able to compare Obama to a "constipated black turd."
And before you start in with "it's fake orange tan" stuff, it still is a stupid thing to criticize Trump about. It shows a fixation on color - natural or fake - by people who proclaim that color should be irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
No, the standard for racism is different than the standard for being offensive. I keep holding out hope that conservatives will eventually figure this out, but I'm continually let down.
Maybe you could help us by defining each offensive circumstance and where it ranks, starting with the worst first. You've got racism. Whites vs. blacks, Latinos, Chinese, etc. Then the opposite where the minorities defame the whites. Next misogamy. Here woman vs. woman, man vs. woman. After that homophobic disparaging, from both straight males and straight females. Then transgender bashing, how does that rank in the list? Finally, explain how each remark is either a joke or slanderous based upon who says it, e.g. an entertainer/comedian/politician/company employee/service worker of the following classes, male or female, black or white, etc.
I am not very versed in the degree of outrage that each remark warrants in any given circumstance so please help me better understand. Also, for each let me know if it is an offense worth of firing, or if an apology or saying it was simply a joke would serve to make it go away
Thanks for your help.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment did not justify cancellation of the entire show - especially considering:
- the harm to so many innocent actors/writers/employees who worked on it,
- Rosanne apologized (several times), and
- she is a comedian! An entertainer. It is her job to push limits and say outrageous things. The networks need to grow up and stop pandering to snowflakes.
Well, that's certainly the exact excuse liberals used to excuse Samantha Bee's grotesque language. Somehow, the standard is different though when a conservative entertainer "pushes the limits."
No, the standard for racism is different than the standard for being offensive. I keep holding out hope that conservatives will eventually figure this out, but I'm continually let down.
Maybe you could help us by defining each offensive circumstance and where it ranks, starting with the worst first. You've got racism. Whites vs. blacks, Latinos, Chinese, etc. Then the opposite where the minorities defame the whites. Next misogamy. Here woman vs. woman, man vs. woman. After that homophobic disparaging, from both straight males and straight females. Then transgender bashing, how does that rank in the list? Finally, explain how each remark is either a joke or slanderous based upon who says it, e.g. an entertainer/comedian/politician/company employee/service worker of the following classes, male or female, black or white, etc.
I am not very versed in the degree of outrage that each remark warrants in any given circumstance so please help me better understand. Also, for each let me know if it is an offense worth of firing, or if an apology or saying it was simply a joke would serve to make it go away
Thanks for your help.
Anonymous wrote:I think the question is what was going on in Roseanne's mind when she made that tweet. Was the Planet of the Apes comparison motivated by VJ's race or her appearance? From actually seeing a picture of her I can believe that the comparison was motivated by her appearance and not her race.