Anonymous wrote:The Internet offers many self-managed ACT/SAT prep courses. Frankly, if she cannot direct her efforts to locate and learn the tutorials on her own, she will likely struggle in a rigorous university curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:The Internet offers many self-managed ACT/SAT prep courses. Frankly, if she cannot direct her efforts to locate and learn the tutorials on her own, she will likely struggle in a rigorous university curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier recommending a tutor. The thing is, a tutor is necessary to figure out the strategies and to go over the wrong answers her so she can see what she did wrong. The tutor will provide your daughter with strategies on how to approach certain questions, and what to look for. My DS had a 33 in his mock tests as a rising junior. After a few months of tutoring, he took the test in February and scored a 35. The tutor will help your DD improve her score significantly, especially the lower scores. It is a worthwhile investment.
This is a great example illustrating why the ACT and SAT are of limited value for colleges and why the Harvard lawsuit will fail.
Exactly. High scores have reduced value because they can be bought and/or made into an extracurricular activity.
+1
That is why schools with holistic admissions can see who probably aid for their higher test scores.
Those of you referring to "paying for" scores-- do you mean, paying for prep courses?
I'll say "yes", and I'll plead guilty to doing it for my own kids. What I won't do is claim that they are somehow being victimized because DD's 1570 doesn't impress Harvard.
Another yes here...we did well over 6 sessions at $150 per session. DS also took 4 mock tests (ranging from 33 to 35) before he even took the real actual test. He ended up with a 36. As my husband put it, he was "peaking" when he took the actual test. Worth every penny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier recommending a tutor. The thing is, a tutor is necessary to figure out the strategies and to go over the wrong answers her so she can see what she did wrong. The tutor will provide your daughter with strategies on how to approach certain questions, and what to look for. My DS had a 33 in his mock tests as a rising junior. After a few months of tutoring, he took the test in February and scored a 35. The tutor will help your DD improve her score significantly, especially the lower scores. It is a worthwhile investment.
This is a great example illustrating why the ACT and SAT are of limited value for colleges and why the Harvard lawsuit will fail.
Exactly. High scores have reduced value because they can be bought and/or made into an extracurricular activity.
+1
That is why schools with holistic admissions can see who probably aid for their higher test scores.
Those of you referring to "paying for" scores-- do you mean, paying for prep courses?
I'll say "yes", and I'll plead guilty to doing it for my own kids. What I won't do is claim that they are somehow being victimized because DD's 1570 doesn't impress Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier recommending a tutor. The thing is, a tutor is necessary to figure out the strategies and to go over the wrong answers her so she can see what she did wrong. The tutor will provide your daughter with strategies on how to approach certain questions, and what to look for. My DS had a 33 in his mock tests as a rising junior. After a few months of tutoring, he took the test in February and scored a 35. The tutor will help your DD improve her score significantly, especially the lower scores. It is a worthwhile investment.
This is a great example illustrating why the ACT and SAT are of limited value for colleges and why the Harvard lawsuit will fail.
Exactly. High scores have reduced value because they can be bought and/or made into an extracurricular activity.
+1
That is why schools with holistic admissions can see who probably aid for their higher test scores.
Those of you referring to "paying for" scores-- do you mean, paying for prep courses?
Another yes here...we did well over 6 sessions at $150 per session. DS also took 4 mock tests (ranging from 33 to 35) before he even took the real actual test. He ended up with a 36. As my husband put it, he was "peaking" when he took the actual test. Worth every penny.
I'll say "yes", and I'll plead guilty to doing it for my own kids. What I won't do is claim that they are somehow being victimized because DD's 1570 doesn't impress Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier recommending a tutor. The thing is, a tutor is necessary to figure out the strategies and to go over the wrong answers her so she can see what she did wrong. The tutor will provide your daughter with strategies on how to approach certain questions, and what to look for. My DS had a 33 in his mock tests as a rising junior. After a few months of tutoring, he took the test in February and scored a 35. The tutor will help your DD improve her score significantly, especially the lower scores. It is a worthwhile investment.
This is a great example illustrating why the ACT and SAT are of limited value for colleges and why the Harvard lawsuit will fail.
Exactly. High scores have reduced value because they can be bought and/or made into an extracurricular activity.
+1
That is why schools with holistic admissions can see who probably aid for their higher test scores.
Those of you referring to "paying for" scores-- do you mean, paying for prep courses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier recommending a tutor. The thing is, a tutor is necessary to figure out the strategies and to go over the wrong answers her so she can see what she did wrong. The tutor will provide your daughter with strategies on how to approach certain questions, and what to look for. My DS had a 33 in his mock tests as a rising junior. After a few months of tutoring, he took the test in February and scored a 35. The tutor will help your DD improve her score significantly, especially the lower scores. It is a worthwhile investment.
This is a great example illustrating why the ACT and SAT are of limited value for colleges and why the Harvard lawsuit will fail.
Exactly. High scores have reduced value because they can be bought and/or made into an extracurricular activity.
+1
That is why schools with holistic admissions can see who probably aid for their higher test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most public universities do not superscore. .
Completely untrue:
https://blog.prepscholar.com/which-colleges-superscore-the-sat
Well my child is looking into engineering at bigger public universities and most of them don’t. Wisconsin, Purdue, WVU, UT - Texas, Purdue, Wyoming, Arizona State, Alabama, The Ohio State, etc....
My kid is looking at Purdue as well. They will look at the highest subscores across all test dates. Essentially, they superscore but don’t call it that.
It was asked at a Purdue local visit session (1.5hrs long) last weekend that there is no longer rolling admissions, EA is Nov 1st, and to only submit your highest SAT or ACT as they do not super score. Right from the director of admissions mouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most public universities do not superscore. .
Completely untrue:
https://blog.prepscholar.com/which-colleges-superscore-the-sat
Well my child is looking into engineering at bigger public universities and most of them don’t. Wisconsin, Purdue, WVU, UT - Texas, Purdue, Wyoming, Arizona State, Alabama, The Ohio State, etc....
My kid is looking at Purdue as well. They will look at the highest subscores across all test dates. Essentially, they superscore but don’t call it that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most public universities do not superscore. .
Completely untrue:
https://blog.prepscholar.com/which-colleges-superscore-the-sat
Well my child is looking into engineering at bigger public universities and most of them don’t. Wisconsin, Purdue, WVU, UT - Texas, Purdue, Wyoming, Arizona State, Alabama, The Ohio State, etc....