Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really people? No one considering a Volvo XC90 that runs $60K+ well equipped (like the PP test model reviewed in the link above) is looking at a $30K Subaru as a comparable alternative.
Yeah, that’s not true at all. Lots of people, even wealthy ones, see their car primarily as a transportation tool and not as a way to advertise they can afford a $1K/mo lease.
We’re looking at cars now and while we could easily write a check for an XC90, at the end of the day we just want a vehicle to get our family from point A to point B as comfortably and safely as possible. If we can find that for $40k why the hell would we spend 2x that just because we can?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a 2018 Highlander Limited Platinum. It has all the bells and whistles and only cost me $42,500 and I got Japanese reliability.
Me too, though I bought a low mileage used 2016 model last year and saved a little (though not much -- maybe $3,000?) as they don't depreciate as quickly as others.
Anonymous wrote:I have a 2018 Highlander Limited Platinum. It has all the bells and whistles and only cost me $42,500 and I got Japanese reliability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh man. I wanted the XC90, but now reading this I'm getting cold feet. What about the Infiniti QX60?
We love our Infiniti QX60. It's really roomy and drives really nicely.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone have experience (good or bad) with a comparable Lexus or Acura? We currently have a Q5 (not a fan!) and were also interested in replacing it with the Volvo.
Anonymous wrote:Oh man. I wanted the XC90, but now reading this I'm getting cold feet. What about the Infiniti QX60?
Anonymous wrote:Really people? No one considering a Volvo XC90 that runs $60K+ well equipped (like the PP test model reviewed in the link above) is looking at a $30K Subaru as a comparable alternative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question... I've lived in MD/VA over the past 45 years and I've known at least a dozen people over that time that have driven a Subaru forester and they were all LGBTQ and/or crunchy (save the earth type) people. Nothing against either group... I've had several good friends, a couple neighbors and even a boss who all drove Subaru forestors and fell into one of these groups. I always just wondered why this seemed to be the case. I'm sure this isn't representative of all Subaru drivers but it's been something I always wondered about since I haven't seen something like this with other cars.
I'm the PP.
FWIW, I'm the PP with an Outback and am a conservative, heterosexual, minority female with kids. I used to actually think the same thing - that Subarus were for LGBTQ people. Not sure where that comes from?
Subaru deliberately marketed to the LGBTQ community. Of course, itt has also marketed heavily to dog owners, outdoorsy people, and people worried about safety (the "They lived" ads).
I'm just a data point but we are a straight white liberal couple with one kid, one dog, and one car, which is a Subaru; I have been in love with Subarus since my friend had one in high school. My gay sister drives a Scion.
Anonymous wrote:I got a Jeep Grand Cherokee last year and I like it very much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really people? No one considering a Volvo XC90 that runs $60K+ well equipped (like the PP test model reviewed in the link above) is looking at a $30K Subaru as a comparable alternative.
It doesn't matter how much the thing cost. The bottom line is it is a poorly built Chinese car.
Range River also costs a lot, nevertheless, it is the car with tons of problems.