Anonymous wrote:All the top 10 universities have near perfect graduation rates. When a bottom decile kid earns a degree are they screwed, stuck with crummy offers, or still in the mix for high status gigs? I doubt the credential helps much if your grades are awful, but maybe I’m naive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know, I graduated 15 years ago from a lower-ranked Ivy, and most of the guys who were TERRIBLE students that I knew (and I knew them because they partied hard... and I hooked up with them) are now mind-blowingly successful. Like, rich bankers, professors at Harvard, top-government jobs.
On the other hand, many in the top 10% (as I was, and many in my group of friends were) are not especially successful at all.
The only way GPA matters is for things like getting into law school. And even then, if you take a few years off to work and still manage to get a great LSAT score, it doesn't matter THAT much.
Good lord you're a moron. When the bulge brackets and MBB and FANG come on campus to recruit they all ask for your GPA.
Not if u have connections....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, it's hard to get bad grades at an elite school due to grade inflation.
Second, if you have an HYPS degree, no one cares about your grades. I've literally never put my GPA on a resume. I wasn't advised to do so by our career office, and I find it very odd when people do it.
Basically, unless you include it on your resume, no one hiring you knows where you ranked in your class. And at least at my undergrad, the only signifier of rank was whether you were Phi Beta Kappa or not.
Eh. My DH and I met on Wall Street back in the late 90s in two different investment banks. We both had to put GPA AND SAT scores on our first applications. Not sure if they still do that but I wouldn't be surprised. I'm pretty sure the bank I worked with had a 1400 minimum. Meaning if you couldn't score above that, you weren't worth looking at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know, I graduated 15 years ago from a lower-ranked Ivy, and most of the guys who were TERRIBLE students that I knew (and I knew them because they partied hard... and I hooked up with them) are now mind-blowingly successful. Like, rich bankers, professors at Harvard, top-government jobs.
On the other hand, many in the top 10% (as I was, and many in my group of friends were) are not especially successful at all.
The only way GPA matters is for things like getting into law school. And even then, if you take a few years off to work and still manage to get a great LSAT score, it doesn't matter THAT much.
Good lord you're a moron. When the bulge brackets and MBB and FANG come on campus to recruit they all ask for your GPA.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know, I graduated 15 years ago from a lower-ranked Ivy, and most of the guys who were TERRIBLE students that I knew (and I knew them because they partied hard... and I hooked up with them) are now mind-blowingly successful. Like, rich bankers, professors at Harvard, top-government jobs.
On the other hand, many in the top 10% (as I was, and many in my group of friends were) are not especially successful at all.
The only way GPA matters is for things like getting into law school. And even then, if you take a few years off to work and still manage to get a great LSAT score, it doesn't matter THAT much.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know, I graduated 15 years ago from a lower-ranked Ivy, and most of the guys who were TERRIBLE students that I knew (and I knew them because they partied hard... and I hooked up with them) are now mind-blowingly successful. Like, rich bankers, professors at Harvard, top-government jobs.
On the other hand, many in the top 10% (as I was, and many in my group of friends were) are not especially successful at all.
The only way GPA matters is for things like getting into law school. And even then, if you take a few years off to work and still manage to get a great LSAT score, it doesn't matter THAT much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What is really frightening is that you both don't understand that it takes 10 to 20 years after graduation from college to have any idea "what happens to someone" or what happens to any particular cohort. The first job people get and if they "have 3 job offers in January" has much more to do with the economy (expected economy) at that time than where they went to school. Over those 10 to 20 years, the economic cycles average out and the benefit of one type of background or another plays out. Any "study" that was based on the last two or three years would have cherry picked the data by definition.
I get that, but higher-ed has changed sooooo much in the last 20 years. Global, common app, fast-moving tech economy. It's just tying to connect 02-06 alums to current campus climate and outcomes is just silly.
Ok, fine. I work in the tech sector. I DGAF about people's GPAs when I interview them. I notice where they went to school, but I mostly pay attention to 1) what they've done (depending on seniority that may include any relevant stuff from college incl. coursework subjects, not grades), 2) what they can speak intelligently and creatively to, and 3) how they present themselves. Honestly, my recruiters are good enough that I rarely have to worry about 1), and 2) and 3) are mixed because I'm trying to suss out whether they are smooth talkers vs. actual experts and whether they are arrogant vs. confident.
There are obviously employers that care about GPS, but they aren't 100% of all employers. Interesting and relevant experience post-undergrad can even make up for poor grades in grad school admission. The only members of the bottom 10% of Harvard who are going to fail in life are the ones who ended up in that bottom 10% because they didn't try and expected the world to be handed to them. Harvard selects for enough intelligence, that you'd be surprised the extent to which those "expect the world to be handed to them" are spread across the spectrum of rank. Elites can open doors you cannot fathom if you haven't experienced it. My siblings both went to one of the best-regarded public flagships, and I went to an elite. We are all successful, but I have flexibility and options they don't have because I can draw upon a network of people who just want to help or talk about school or whatever...and I have an impeccable pedigree.
Which schools comprise the elites in your sector?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, it's hard to get bad grades at an elite school due to grade inflation.
Second, if you have an HYPS degree, no one cares about your grades. I've literally never put my GPA on a resume. I wasn't advised to do so by our career office, and I find it very odd when people do it.
Basically, unless you include it on your resume, no one hiring you knows where you ranked in your class. And at least at my undergrad, the only signifier of rank was whether you were Phi Beta Kappa or not.
Eh. My DH and I met on Wall Street back in the late 90s in two different investment banks. We both had to put GPA AND SAT scores on our first applications. Not sure if they still do that but I wouldn't be surprised. I'm pretty sure the bank I worked with had a 1400 minimum. Meaning if you couldn't score above that, you weren't worth looking at all.
Anonymous wrote:First, it's hard to get bad grades at an elite school due to grade inflation.
Second, if you have an HYPS degree, no one cares about your grades. I've literally never put my GPA on a resume. I wasn't advised to do so by our career office, and I find it very odd when people do it.
Basically, unless you include it on your resume, no one hiring you knows where you ranked in your class. And at least at my undergrad, the only signifier of rank was whether you were Phi Beta Kappa or not.