Anonymous wrote:That sounds like a crappy situation and they should make thier chaperone policy clearer and not allow family member tagalongs, imho.
That being said, I've also been on amusement park field trips where some kids in a group want to ride the biggest roller coasters and some kids are terrified, and we have to compromise. Usually the compromise ends up skewing in favor of the most scared because at least the thrillseekers will ride the nonthrilling rides whereas the scaredy cats will not join the thrillseekers. It's part of the experience of traveling in groups with different interests... So chalk that up to life and preferring to travel with family then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like the parents actually chaperoned and that is the problem.
I am guessing that your DD had friends who were in other groups and the chaperone let the kids go off and do what they wanted all the time and just had the kids text to check in and that the family your DD was with actually had the kids stay with them so they could supervise. I think the babysitting is over exaggerating and didn't happen.
No. The chaperones did NOT chaperone. They put their family vacation desires first and forced my child and another classmate to tag along with them instead of shadowing the students on what they wanted to do. This was unacceptable and it will be addressed. Already on it now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like the parents actually chaperoned and that is the problem.
I am guessing that your DD had friends who were in other groups and the chaperone let the kids go off and do what they wanted all the time and just had the kids text to check in and that the family your DD was with actually had the kids stay with them so they could supervise. I think the babysitting is over exaggerating and didn't happen.
No. The chaperones did NOT chaperone. They put their family vacation desires first and forced my child and another classmate to tag along with them instead of shadowing the students on what they wanted to do. This was unacceptable and it will be addressed. Already on it now.
Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like the parents actually chaperoned and that is the problem.
I am guessing that your DD had friends who were in other groups and the chaperone let the kids go off and do what they wanted all the time and just had the kids text to check in and that the family your DD was with actually had the kids stay with them so they could supervise. I think the babysitting is over exaggerating and didn't happen.
Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like the parents actually chaperoned and that is the problem.
I am guessing that your DD had friends who were in other groups and the chaperone let the kids go off and do what they wanted all the time and just had the kids text to check in and that the family your DD was with actually had the kids stay with them so they could supervise. I think the babysitting is over exaggerating and didn't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All 7 of them, including the dad were sharing a hotel room? How is that possible?
Two hotel rooms. Family in one. Students in the other.
Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like the parents actually chaperoned and that is the problem.
I am guessing that your DD had friends who were in other groups and the chaperone let the kids go off and do what they wanted all the time and just had the kids text to check in and that the family your DD was with actually had the kids stay with them so they could supervise. I think the babysitting is over exaggerating and didn't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Were they able to hang out with their own peer group doing things more typical of their age group, or did they need to hang around doing things only younger siblings could d[b]o?
OP. This. (The latter).
I get it now, OP. These teenagers worked to earn this trip and then had to spend the fun part with someone else's younger children, not with their school friends their own age.
I would address it with the school and ask for rules to be created to address this clearly in future trips. You cannot salvage your DD's bad experience after the fact, but you can model for her that when things are badly organized, people can step up to try to make things better for others who come after them.
I've seen teenagers do a lot of work and put in many hours of real effort to go on trips like the one you're describing. For any of them to have to hang around with a family rather than spend the trip with their peer group, after months and months of work, is a complete shame and waste.
I do still want to ask -- did any educational stuff go on? Were the students brought together as a peer group for the core activity, whatever it was (theater festival, marching band event, etc.) and the problem was when the kids were doing "free time" in an amusement park, for instance, and your DD and friend had to stick with this chaperone family?
I have chaperoned several trips to amusement park days held for school orchestras and bands, where there was a playing competition first thing and then the kids were with parent chaperones in the park for the rest of the day. We would never have been allowed to bring our own, other kids. Your school blew it, or maybe that one parent chaperone just flouted the rules that were in place.