Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luckily I have a triple digit IQ and can think of better, more productive ways to discipline my kids than physically hurting them.
You know what? I have an IQ of 148 and I have spanked my kids. And I know a lot of other intelligent people who do. In fact, as the studies show, those of you who have never spanked are in the clear minority (roughly 20%).
That said, spanking is not a common occurrence nor is it be done as an immediate or emotional response to anything, those are the lessons that teach that hitting is acceptable. In our situation, we use other non-hitting forms of discipline. Spanking for us was introduced when the children were verbal and were able to associate cause and effect. If they violated other forms of discipline (like leaving timeout) then they were given the option to return or get spanked as an alternative response to the disciplinary issue. One of the things is that it was established that hitting was an alternative discipline, not a primary discipline and the child had the option to go with the original punishment or take this instead. I had my child who did not want to sit in timeout accept a spanking (always on the bottom, not anywhere else) when he didn't want a long timeout (timeouts were #minutes=age in years). But this was not spanking in retaliation, but a choice the child made to trade punishments.
The only other time I've used spanking is when the child instinctively did something dangerous (running in a parking lot without looking) and repeated attempts to talk to him did not encourage him to change his behavior. So, one time after he had been told repeatedly not to bolt in the parking lot, he did so and was promptly swatted on his bottom to make sure that there was an emotional reaction to this behavior. That was a few years ago now and it did solve the problem. He didn't run away after that. In this case, his running was action without conscious thought and no number of warnings or requests to behave safely were heeded. And the response stuck and he did not approach parking lots as a playground again.
Anonymous wrote:Luckily I have a triple digit IQ and can think of better, more productive ways to discipline my kids than physically hurting them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is shocking to me that people still spank. Horrific. How redneck - that you would try to call it anything but physical abuse is absurd.
The vast majority of parents spank. It's not "redneck", it's universal.
It is most certainly not universal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luckily I have a triple digit IQ and can think of better, more productive ways to discipline my kids than physically hurting them.
So when your triple digit IQ fails to help you of think of more productive ways to deal with your rebellious child, what then? You know, the child who starts defying your every request because they can?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am pro spanking. I was spanked. It made me try harder because I feared upsetting my parents. I was taught respect and I am so thankful that I was spanked. This generation is so screwed.
You suck. I was spanked with a belt, spoon, hand, yardstick and I will never do that to my daughter. I would never accept any affection (hug and kiss at night) from my dad because all he ever did was spank and yell at me. Your kids are screwed not mine.
Anonymous wrote:I am pro spanking. I was spanked. It made me try harder because I feared upsetting my parents. I was taught respect and I am so thankful that I was spanked. This generation is so screwed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may be that people are viewing the same term with different meanings. I would never spank my kids the way I was spanked. I got the whole - come over here and bend over and five whacks from my dad (lucky me, family #2 and my mom wouldn’t let him use the belt like he did on my older half sibs). I have (but don’t anymore because it isn’t effective) swatted my kids on the butt when they were doing something unsafe or overly disrespectful and were not responding to more subtle redirection. I have a healthy relationship with my kids and they both love being around me and they both confide in me.
NP here who agrees with this poster. We actually only just started spanking our almost 4 year old. We thought long and hard about it and the method to use when spanking as well as what types of behavior deserve a spank. We have chosen to spank for consistent disobedient behavior. We are Christian and apply many of the methods suggested by other Christian authors whereby you take the child to a private location, explain why they are getting spanked, spank and then explain again why they were spanked, hug, and then its over and done with. No more dwelling on the incident. It's still early on but surprisingly, we are having to spank a lot less than I expected and the alternative approaches (yelling, screaming, time outs etc. have also diminished in frequency). Again, it's still early on but I've been surprised how our child approaches the spanking as well as the aftermath. It has been more effective than the behavior that would result from all the previous back and forth we used to do. In all honesty, a great deal of the crying occurs before the actually spanking (it seems just the thought/knowledge that he is about to be spanked does a number on him). There is a small window when you can effectively spank and we've been told that that is usually only up until 8 or 9 at most after which the kid is really too big to spank (which I can imagine). Again, to each their own. Having been on both sides of the fence on this issue I can tell you it is not as simple as black and white nor is it abuse as many people have stated on this forum. Honestly, I think and know of quite a number of people who do spank and we are high SES families who love our kids. I think most don't waste their time getting involved in the back and forth discussion on the issue in these types of forums. I don't plan on commenting any more about this either but wanted to at least respond as I appreciated the pp comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may be that people are viewing the same term with different meanings. I would never spank my kids the way I was spanked. I got the whole - come over here and bend over and five whacks from my dad (lucky me, family #2 and my mom wouldn’t let him use the belt like he did on my older half sibs). I have (but don’t anymore because it isn’t effective) swatted my kids on the butt when they were doing something unsafe or overly disrespectful and were not responding to more subtle redirection. I have a healthy relationship with my kids and they both love being around me and they both confide in me.
NP here who agrees with this poster. We actually only just started spanking our almost 4 year old. We thought long and hard about it and the method to use when spanking as well as what types of behavior deserve a spank. We have chosen to spank for consistent disobedient behavior. We are Christian and apply many of the methods suggested by other Christian authors whereby you take the child to a private location, explain why they are getting spanked, spank and then explain again why they were spanked, hug, and then its over and done with. No more dwelling on the incident. It's still early on but surprisingly, we are having to spank a lot less than I expected and the alternative approaches (yelling, screaming, time outs etc. have also diminished in frequency). Again, it's still early on but I've been surprised how our child approaches the spanking as well as the aftermath. It has been more effective than the behavior that would result from all the previous back and forth we used to do. In all honesty, a great deal of the crying occurs before the actually spanking (it seems just the thought/knowledge that he is about to be spanked does a number on him). There is a small window when you can effectively spank and we've been told that that is usually only up until 8 or 9 at most after which the kid is really too big to spank (which I can imagine). Again, to each their own. Having been on both sides of the fence on this issue I can tell you it is not as simple as black and white nor is it abuse as many people have stated on this forum. Honestly, I think and know of quite a number of people who do spank and we are high SES families who love our kids. I think most don't waste their time getting involved in the back and forth discussion on the issue in these types of forums. I don't plan on commenting any more about this either but wanted to at least respond as I appreciated the pp comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It may be that people are viewing the same term with different meanings. I would never spank my kids the way I was spanked. I got the whole - come over here and bend over and five whacks from my dad (lucky me, family #2 and my mom wouldn’t let him use the belt like he did on my older half sibs). I have (but don’t anymore because it isn’t effective) swatted my kids on the butt when they were doing something unsafe or overly disrespectful and were not responding to more subtle redirection. I have a healthy relationship with my kids and they both love being around me and they both confide in me.
NP here who agrees with this poster. We actually only just started spanking our almost 4 year old. We thought long and hard about it and the method to use when spanking as well as what types of behavior deserve a spank. We have chosen to spank for consistent disobedient behavior. We are Christian and apply many of the methods suggested by other Christian authors whereby you take the child to a private location, explain why they are getting spanked, spank and then explain again why they were spanked, hug, and then its over and done with. No more dwelling on the incident. It's still early on but surprisingly, we are having to spank a lot less than I expected and the alternative approaches (yelling, screaming, time outs etc. have also diminished in frequency). Again, it's still early on but I've been surprised how our child approaches the spanking as well as the aftermath. It has been more effective than the behavior that would result from all the previous back and forth we used to do. In all honesty, a great deal of the crying occurs before the actually spanking (it seems just the thought/knowledge that he is about to be spanked does a number on him). There is a small window when you can effectively spank and we've been told that that is usually only up until 8 or 9 at most after which the kid is really too big to spank (which I can imagine). Again, to each their own. Having been on both sides of the fence on this issue I can tell you it is not as simple as black and white nor is it abuse as many people have stated on this forum. Honestly, I think and know of quite a number of people who do spank and we are high SES families who love our kids. I think most don't waste their time getting involved in the back and forth discussion on the issue in these types of forums. I don't plan on commenting any more about this either but wanted to at least respond as I appreciated the pp comments.
Anonymous wrote:It may be that people are viewing the same term with different meanings. I would never spank my kids the way I was spanked. I got the whole - come over here and bend over and five whacks from my dad (lucky me, family #2 and my mom wouldn’t let him use the belt like he did on my older half sibs). I have (but don’t anymore because it isn’t effective) swatted my kids on the butt when they were doing something unsafe or overly disrespectful and were not responding to more subtle redirection. I have a healthy relationship with my kids and they both love being around me and they both confide in me.