I think this line in the Roger Stone indictment is a big deal:

12. After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by Organization 1.

In other words, the Trump Campaign was not just receiving information from Stone, but rather was actively soliciting information. In other words, Stone and the Trump Campaign were working as accomplices. So if Stone gets tied to a crime related to the emails, then the Trump Campaign is tied too (as well as the "senior official" individually, and whoever directed him to contact Stone).

If Junior is indicted, will Senior throw him under the bus to save himself?

Here’s a beaut from Para. 17

“On or about October 7, 2016, Organization 1 released the first set of emails stolen from the Clinton Campaign chairman. Shortly after Organization 1’s release, an associate of the highranking Trump Campaign official sent a text message to STONE that read 'well done.'"

I can hear it now.

Donald J Trump: I barely knew Roger Stone. He was only with me for a short period of time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

But if you have nothing to hide, why are you committing process crimes?

Stop using that fake term

Yes, process crimes.... talk about spin! Stop trying to polish the turd. You need to start grappling with the fact Trump is dirty, like really dirty.

They already know that. They don't care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! Mueller has texts and emails and they point directly to a massive conspiracy with the Trump campaign. Mueller is getting really close to the top here. And these are just the indictments - not even part of the CI report.

And this little gem.

“On or about October 1, 2016, which was a Saturday, Person 2 sent STONE text messages that stated, ‘big news Wednesday . . . now pretend u don’t know me . . . Hillary’s campaign will die this week.’”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

But if you have nothing to hide, why are you committing process crimes?

Stop using that fake term

Yes, process crimes.... talk about spin! Stop trying to polish the turd. You need to start grappling with the fact Trump is dirty, like really dirty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

But if you have nothing to hide, why are you committing process crimes?

Stop using that fake term

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

Wait, so once an investigation uncovers crimes, they’re no longer crimes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

But if you have nothing to hide, why are you committing process crimes?

Wait, wasn't the process crime the thing that got Clinton impeached? I heard it was a really, really big deal then. All that 'rule of law' stuff.

Anonymous wrote:Wow! Mueller has texts and emails and they point directly to a massive conspiracy with the Trump campaign. Mueller is getting really close to the top here. And these are just the indictments - not even part of the CI report.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

Witness tampering is very bad. Stop making light of it.

Wow! Mueller has texts and emails and they point directly to a massive conspiracy with the Trump campaign. Mueller is getting really close to the top here. And these are just the indictments - not even part of the CI report.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

But if you have nothing to hide, why are you committing process crimes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stone has been a lying sleaze bag since his college days in DC. He was a Nixon RNC trickster.

FBI arrested Stone.

NBC reports that they also issued summonses to twelve of his associates to appear before the Grand Jury.