Anonymous wrote:
First - diving (make All Stars every summer), swimming - same always divisionals/All Stars during summer - swim and dive at a lighter level during winter to "keep up". baseball and soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming is an individual sport with an artificial team structure imposed on it. You can impose such a structure on almost anything, but it doesn't make it a team sport. The Ryder cup players are playing on a golf team. They work in union with one another. Golf is still not a team sport. Same with swimming. Creating a team structure/competition/relays is just a way to include more kids in the individual sport, and train them as a group rather than individuals.
+1
You need eleven players plus subs to play a soccer match. That is what I think of as a team sport.
However, there isn't a set number of swimmers for a team. While the US sends two swimmers per event to the Olympics, other smaller countries (with fewer world class swimmers than the US) require their swimmers to meet a certain standard, such as the probability of making a semi-final. If their top backstoker isn't world class, they don't send a backstroker. Thus a swim "team" might be 40 people or might just be one or two.
There are no swim teams with 2 people, usually 40 to a few hundred.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. In our family, it is just a life skill. There is no team, and as far as sport, you are swimming people. Come on.
It started a survival skill in our home and somehow it morphed into swim team. Its a sport.
We starting playing checkers in our home and now my DD is on her school's chess team. Beat that . . . swimmer!
I would love that..my kid would probably like chess too. I have tried and tried to steer him away from swim but everything I try isn't working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. In our family, it is just a life skill. There is no team, and as far as sport, you are swimming people. Come on.
It started a survival skill in our home and somehow it morphed into swim team. Its a sport.
We starting playing checkers in our home and now my DD is on her school's chess team. Beat that . . . swimmer!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. In our family, it is just a life skill. There is no team, and as far as sport, you are swimming people. Come on.
It started a survival skill in our home and somehow it morphed into swim team. Its a sport.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. In our family, it is just a life skill. There is no team, and as far as sport, you are swimming people. Come on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming is an individual sport with an artificial team structure imposed on it. You can impose such a structure on almost anything, but it doesn't make it a team sport. The Ryder cup players are playing on a golf team. They work in union with one another. Golf is still not a team sport. Same with swimming. Creating a team structure/competition/relays is just a way to include more kids in the individual sport, and train them as a group rather than individuals.
+1
You need eleven players plus subs to play a soccer match. That is what I think of as a team sport.
However, there isn't a set number of swimmers for a team. While the US sends two swimmers per event to the Olympics, other smaller countries (with fewer world class swimmers than the US) require their swimmers to meet a certain standard, such as the probability of making a semi-final. If their top backstoker isn't world class, they don't send a backstroker. Thus a swim "team" might be 40 people or might just be one or two.
Anonymous wrote:Swimming is an individual sport with an artificial team structure imposed on it. You can impose such a structure on almost anything, but it doesn't make it a team sport. The Ryder cup players are playing on a golf team. They work in union with one another. Golf is still not a team sport. Same with swimming. Creating a team structure/competition/relays is just a way to include more kids in the individual sport, and train them as a group rather than individuals.
Anonymous wrote:I think most swimmers (and track & field participants) care less about whether their "team" wins a meet than whether they, as an individual, win their races. Look at the Olympics, there's no overall team gold.