Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree. I saw this more at GDS but dunno, maybe it's Sidwell too. Basically it's just a very rigid, humorless approach to every issue.
I saw signs like this posted at Maret that were very off-putting. DC now at Sidwell and have never seen anything like this but that doesn't mean it isn't there, of course.
It's more a reflection of where things are in 2018, especially with the younger generations. Go look at the signs kids made for International Women's Day at NCS and you'll see the same themes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree. I saw this more at GDS but dunno, maybe it's Sidwell too. Basically it's just a very rigid, humorless approach to every issue.
I saw signs like this posted at Maret that were very off-putting. DC now at Sidwell and have never seen anything like this but that doesn't mean it isn't there, of course.
Anonymous wrote:You were upset because the school had LGBQT posters on the walls?
Anonymous wrote:I agree. I saw this more at GDS but dunno, maybe it's Sidwell too. Basically it's just a very rigid, humorless approach to every issue.
Anonymous wrote:I agree. I saw this more at GDS but dunno, maybe it's Sidwell too. Basically it's just a very rigid, humorless approach to every issue.
Anonymous wrote:^^^No-but I don’t want my DC in an environment where being PC all day long is more valued than being themselves-having to watch everything you say and do 100% of the time is not the experience I want for them. And the book censoring was over the top.
+1Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone even the smartest of the bunch have tutors to give them an edge. It’s a ridiculous environment to put a kid in. Even worse is it’s not so Quaker encouragement of rampant competition and self righteousness.
Absolutely not true. My dc has never had a tutor- except for me, occasionally- and does quite well.
+ My kid never has a tutor in Sidwell. Besides, we have not seen any competition among students or parents. Verh often, my kid tells us like " I am so glad a friend had a good score, or feel sorry for another friend who did not do well in a test". They do help each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone even the smartest of the bunch have tutors to give them an edge. It’s a ridiculous environment to put a kid in. Even worse is it’s not so Quaker encouragement of rampant competition and self righteousness.
Absolutely not true. My dc has never had a tutor- except for me, occasionally- and does quite well.
+ My kid never has a tutor in Sidwell. Besides, we have not seen any competition among students or parents. Verh often, my kid tells us like " I am so glad a friend had a good score, or feel sorry for another friend who did not do well in a test". They do help each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are headed to Sidwell, just be prepared for hearing about social justice issues, over and over, all the time. It’s relentless. Everything has to have a message.
This is true and to my DC, frankly, it's annoying. But take heart -- it's nowhere near as bad as it is at GDS.
Serious question: We had good friends pull their kids out of GDS not b/c they have a social justice bent, but b/c on just about every social justice issue, they had a SPECIFIC bent. Instead of encouraging openness, it seemed to channel the students into one set of ways of talking about issues. I know Sidwell won’t have such a pronounced social justice bent as GDS, but whatever bent it has, is it specific? I’m actually quite supportive of being socially conscious and aware, and we are thinking of applying our DC to Sidwell next year. However, given that we were turned off by our friend’s experience at GDS w/r/t social justice thought-channeling, I thought I’d ask this about Sidwell. How much freedom is there to think about issues of social justice in a variety of (non-jerk) ways? And are students mostly happy, to take it back to OP, because they are given some freedom? Or is it not quite that way?