Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet immigrants bring their elderly relatives who didn’t work a day here but get Medicare, Medicaid,subsidized housing and whatnot.
Fwiw I am an immigrant.
Correct - it’s scandalous what chain migration has done and this is one of many ill effects.
Whose idea was chain migration?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been assuming that SS will be means tested or otherwise not available by the time I retire.
There's an easy fix: Eliminate or raise the $127,200 cap on SS contributions, and implement means testing, since folks like Warren Buffett do not need SS. Those two things alone would make SS solvent for the next couple of generations.
The upper-middle class liberals here would scream holy terror.
Anonymous wrote:Yet immigrants bring their elderly relatives who didn’t work a day here but get Medicare, Medicaid,subsidized housing and whatnot.
Fwiw I am an immigrant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet immigrants bring their elderly relatives who didn’t work a day here but get Medicare, Medicaid,subsidized housing and whatnot.
Fwiw I am an immigrant.
Correct - it’s scandalous what chain migration has done and this is one of many ill effects.
Whose idea was chain migration?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not country’s job to fix. They should have saved more when they were young.
My dad DID save. My mom has not had a full time job ... ever in my life. My dad got laid off a few times in his career, once right before finding out he needed open heart surgery, right at the start of the recession. Sometimes luck is not on your side. He is a hard worker. He has a master's degree. He is one of two old guys at his company.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not country’s job to fix. They should have saved more when they were young.
How could they save more when they were young when our government changed the rules in the 1970s? Prior to that, one person could work, afford housing and a decent life while the other parent raised the kids. Health care was affordable, college was even affordable (and not even necessary since we still had blue collar jobs that paid a fair wage). And the biggest issue: wages never kept pace with the cost of housing or living.
Now it takes a dual income, and even then it's a struggle. Housing is too costly, child care is too costly, and everyone is drowning in student debt. And apparently healthcare is a privilege for the anointed ones.
Yet you think everyone should magically be able to save enough for retirement?
Guess what? A 65 year old man died over the weekend because he was living in his car since he could no longer work construction and simply couldn't afford a place to rent. And mark my words: we will see more of this as the elderly simply can't afford to support themselves.
I don't blame senior citizens who worked hard and still struggle. Rather, I feel disgusted by our country that has devolved to such a sad state that our elderly aren't provided with high quality healthcare and can't afford food, shelter, etc. It's appalling. This is 2018 in what used to be the greatest country on the planet. FTR, I'm a bleeding heart liberal who blames the democrats just as much as the republicans. The sea change that shifted our country to one that put corporate needs above the needs of actual people didn't happen without both parties ripping up the play book and crafting a new deal that screws most Americans.
It's time for a mutiny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Social Security should be three times what it is today.
FWIW, my opinion is that private saving for retirement is challenging on many levels. Capacity to save, discipline to save, and acumen to manage retirement savings. There are many very successful people who have a very difficult time doing this.
From an actuarial perspective, it's exceptionally hard to do with an n of 1, or 2 for married couple.
Why is it so hard to save? I made an average salary my entire career, always lived below my means, and saved 10% - 15% of my income. Sure, I didn't go out to eat as frequently as my friends, book expensive hotels for vacations to Hawaii like they did, buy timeshares, buy the top trim model of cars, stretch big-time to buy property (or even a second home), buy expensive designer brand purses and clothes.
Today, those same friends are 60ish and tell me they can't stop working for the foreseeable future. I am younger (slightly) and can retire at any time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet immigrants bring their elderly relatives who didn’t work a day here but get Medicare, Medicaid,subsidized housing and whatnot.
Fwiw I am an immigrant.
Correct - it’s scandalous what chain migration has done and this is one of many ill effects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not country’s job to fix. They should have saved more when they were young.
How could they save more when they were young when our government changed the rules in the 1970s? Prior to that, one person could work, afford housing and a decent life while the other parent raised the kids. Health care was affordable, college was even affordable (and not even necessary since we still had blue collar jobs that paid a fair wage). And the biggest issue: wages never kept pace with the cost of housing or living.
Now it takes a dual income, and even then it's a struggle. Housing is too costly, child care is too costly, and everyone is drowning in student debt. And apparently healthcare is a privilege for the anointed ones.
Yet you think everyone should magically be able to save enough for retirement?
Guess what? A 65 year old man died over the weekend because he was living in his car since he could no longer work construction and simply couldn't afford a place to rent. And mark my words: we will see more of this as the elderly simply can't afford to support themselves.
I don't blame senior citizens who worked hard and still struggle. Rather, I feel disgusted by our country that has devolved to such a sad state that our elderly aren't provided with high quality healthcare and can't afford food, shelter, etc. It's appalling. This is 2018 in what used to be the greatest country on the planet. FTR, I'm a bleeding heart liberal who blames the democrats just as much as the republicans. The sea change that shifted our country to one that put corporate needs above the needs of actual people didn't happen without both parties ripping up the play book and crafting a new deal that screws most Americans.
It's time for a mutiny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been assuming that SS will be means tested or otherwise not available by the time I retire.
There's an easy fix: Eliminate or raise the $127,200 cap on SS contributions, and implement means testing, since folks like Warren Buffett do not need SS. Those two things alone would make SS solvent for the next couple of generations.
They should definitely raise the SS contribution cap. We are done with that by March. It's ridiculous. I wouldn't want to means test. These programs work best when there is skin in the game for everyone.
Agree with this (and it would mean a substantial tax increase for our family). I don't like the means testing, either. I think everyone should have skin in the game and yeah, if you've paid into the system, you deserve to get something back, whether or not you "need" it.
A large proportion of what we make above the cap is contributed to our retirement savings. Thanks to the "Trump bump" in the market over the last year, our planner told us last week we can retire 2 years sooner than we expected. We were elated. I would rather manager my own money for retirement rather than giving it to the government.
The extra money would be going to help seniors across the country but I guess that's not your jam.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not country’s job to fix. They should have saved more when they were young.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been assuming that SS will be means tested or otherwise not available by the time I retire.
There's an easy fix: Eliminate or raise the $127,200 cap on SS contributions, and implement means testing, since folks like Warren Buffett do not need SS. Those two things alone would make SS solvent for the next couple of generations.
The upper-middle class liberals here would scream holy terror.
I posted earlier. We are done with the cap by mid March. It's ridiculous that we aren't asked to pay more into the system.
The system isn't setup to give you an even higher benefit so its moot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been assuming that SS will be means tested or otherwise not available by the time I retire.
There's an easy fix: Eliminate or raise the $127,200 cap on SS contributions, and implement means testing, since folks like Warren Buffett do not need SS. Those two things alone would make SS solvent for the next couple of generations.
The upper-middle class liberals here would scream holy terror.
I posted earlier. We are done with the cap by mid March. It's ridiculous that we aren't asked to pay more into the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been assuming that SS will be means tested or otherwise not available by the time I retire.
There's an easy fix: Eliminate or raise the $127,200 cap on SS contributions, and implement means testing, since folks like Warren Buffett do not need SS. Those two things alone would make SS solvent for the next couple of generations.
The upper-middle class liberals here would scream holy terror.