Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Megan Markle and Kate Middleton are both gorgeous and stylish in different ways. But most important, they both seem down-to-earth and normal... unlike the haters on DCUM.
Yes. Every down-to-earth woman I know wore a $75,000 dress in her engagement photos.
You can be wealthy AND down-to-earth.Sorry you didn't know that.
Good thing she targeted a rich guy.
You do realize she's independently wealthy, right?
If you are referring to her basic-cable TV "career" and her father's lottery win 28 years ago, yes. Beyond that, no.
Lol! She's independently wealthy now. In about 6 months, she's going to become filthy rich and royal. Go Meghan--show them how it's done!
Precisely my point- that's because of Harry. I doubt her suitcase-opening on Deal or No Deal made her independently wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have similar personalities. They like to shock and awe. I think she is perfect for Harry because she is stunningly beautiful, accomplished, independent and gives no fucks!
Compare her to her sister in law Kate. Kate has always been super impressed with and intimidated by the Monarchy. Ever since she met William she changed herself to meet their rules and expectations and has followed every rule to the book.
Meghan being half black, having no pedigree and being an actress gives no f*cks! She’s gonna visit Harry at Kensington Palace, get married to him after a whirlwind romance, have crazy PDA and wear a sheer see through 75000 designer gown for her royal engagement outfit.
I LOVE her guts and I love how she isn’t changing herself for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Megan Markle and Kate Middleton are both gorgeous and stylish in different ways. But most important, they both seem down-to-earth and normal... unlike the haters on DCUM.
Yes. Every down-to-earth woman I know wore a $75,000 dress in her engagement photos.
You can be wealthy AND down-to-earth.Sorry you didn't know that.
Good thing she targeted a rich guy.
You do realize she's independently wealthy, right?
If you are referring to her basic-cable TV "career" and her father's lottery win 28 years ago, yes. Beyond that, no.
Lol! She's independently wealthy now. In about 6 months, she's going to become filthy rich and royal. Go Meghan--show them how it's done!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
Oh please.It's not the classiest thing ever, but "really gross and tacky." It's just silly.
No, it's tacky and gross. It reminds me of Miley Cyrus. It is really immature, too.
If she did this deliberately then I'd say it shows a lack of class. Whether she likes it or not, she is marrying royalty and with that brings privileges and responsibilities. There is a certain decorum that needs to be maintained.
Some of ya'll are acting like this is still the middle ages and toothless peasants thought royals were one step below God. They are people who hit the mom and dad lottery, have a lot of money and are human. They wear sweatpants, take showers, take dumps, frown and smile. Snaps of Kate's skirt flying up at official events, William grabbing boobs, Harry naked in Vegas and Princess Why Did You Wear That Brooch to Lunch hanging with one of her boytoys are out there plain as day, but shame on Meghan. Going forward she should take her cues from her future in laws:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
I'm a photographer. Do you know how many times I have photographed people with their tongues out? This photo is candid and she could have been caught licking her lips or talking. Don't believe everything you see and read.
If she did this deliberately then I'd say it shows a lack of class. Whether she likes it or not, she is marrying royalty and with that brings privileges and responsibilities. There is a certain decorum that needs to be maintained.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
I'm a photographer. Do you know how many times I have photographed people with their tongues out? This photo is candid and she could have been caught licking her lips or talking. Don't believe everything you see and read.
Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate's looking good here. She should not diet herself silly after she has the baby. The anorexic look does not suit her.
+1.
+2. She doesn't look good super skinny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
Oh please.It's not the classiest thing ever, but "really gross and tacky." It's just silly.
No, it's tacky and gross. It reminds me of Miley Cyrus. It is really immature, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
Oh please.It's not the classiest thing ever, but "really gross and tacky." It's just silly.
No, it's tacky and gross. It reminds me of Miley Cyrus. It is really immature, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm generally ambivalent about the royals (I think the Kate hate posts are kind of ridiculous), but I think Meghan putting out her tongue when photographed with the her future in-laws was gross and tacky. Really gross and really tacky.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-shows-playful-side-11750660
Oh please.It's not the classiest thing ever, but "really gross and tacky." It's just silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate's looking good here. She should not diet herself silly after she has the baby. The anorexic look does not suit her.
+1.