Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say this as a curvy woman (big boobs/ass, small waist, size 4/6, not fat):

Yes, absolutely. Everything else (clothes, clothing size, weight) equal, a woman with a slim/athletic/boyish build is going to look "higher status" than the same woman with big hips and big breasts. A more athletic body type fits a certain WASPy aesthetic. Curves don't work with that look. Look around: how many curvy women do you see living in the biggest houses, driving the best cars, married to the highest earning men?

Those men's loss.

Perhaps. Or maybe they're attracted to that type of woman.

-1

They marry the bony type to fulfill the image and cheat with curvy women.

This. I have been an assistant in financial services and legal services firms for 30 years. These offices are full of wealthy white men and, almost without exception, these men all have bone-thin, white wives. All the mistresses and flings are curvaceous, sexy, and often of color. The skinny wife is as much for image as the big house is. And she is viewed as a possession, not a valued human being, which is why these men cheat so flagrantly and use every excuse to avoid their wives, while spending a lot of time with their other women.

Rich men have thin wives not because they want a woman with a boy body but because the women are expected to look that way in their circle. The men wouldn't care if their wives gained a few pounds and would actually prefer it.

It's a no brained that their affair partners tend to be curvy. Men like curves. Women don't like curves on each other.

Sis, big ass = fat.

Anonymous wrote:It seems that we live in a society where thinness is associated with wealth and status and being curvy is a sign of lower class masses.




Here are two white wealthy women. Does one look higher class side to body type?

You sound a tad crazy.

Fat too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not classy in any way to sleep with a married man- so I guess you have your answer as to class and body type. You’re saying that thin and white gets privileges and money and security but curvy gets sloppy seconds with a married father.

Mic drop!

Someone needs to do a tutorial on how to use this term properly. That inane comment was NOT a mic drop moment. Jesus.

Anonymous wrote:It’s not classy in any way to sleep with a married man- so I guess you have your answer as to class and body type. You’re saying that thin and white gets privileges and money and security but curvy gets sloppy seconds with a married father.

Mic drop!

Anonymous wrote:It’s not classy in any way to sleep with a married man- so I guess you have your answer as to class and body type. You’re saying that thin and white gets privileges and money and security but curvy gets sloppy seconds with a married father.

Assistant PP here. I used to think the wives had it made until I had a front row seat to a nasty divorce one too many times. A lot of these wives live insecure lives because the money comes and goes with the man's favor. When I first started, it was unheard of for men to get custody, so the wives at least got child support. Now, men are fighting for custody of children they barely see and I can discern no reason beyond sticking it to the ex-wife. At least mistresses get lucrative gifts with no strings or children attached.

All of this is to say that whether mistress or wife, the women in rich, white men's lives are in precarious positions and I don't envy any of them. I don't see much that is classy about putting up with an asshole because your lifestyle will end if you don't.

It’s not classy in any way to sleep with a married man- so I guess you have your answer as to class and body type. You’re saying that thin and white gets privileges and money and security but curvy gets sloppy seconds with a married father.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say this as a curvy woman (big boobs/ass, small waist, size 4/6, not fat):

Yes, absolutely. Everything else (clothes, clothing size, weight) equal, a woman with a slim/athletic/boyish build is going to look "higher status" than the same woman with big hips and big breasts. A more athletic body type fits a certain WASPy aesthetic. Curves don't work with that look. Look around: how many curvy women do you see living in the biggest houses, driving the best cars, married to the highest earning men?

Those men's loss.

Perhaps. Or maybe they're attracted to that type of woman.

-1

They marry the bony type to fulfill the image and cheat with curvy women.

This. I have been an assistant in financial services and legal services firms for 30 years. These offices are full of wealthy white men and, almost without exception, these men all have bone-thin, white wives. All the mistresses and flings are curvaceous, sexy, and often of color. The skinny wife is as much for image as the big house is. And she is viewed as a possession, not a valued human being, which is why these men cheat so flagrantly and use every excuse to avoid their wives, while spending a lot of time with their other women.

Rich men have thin wives not because they want a woman with a boy body but because the women are expected to look that way in their circle. The men wouldn't care if their wives gained a few pounds and would actually prefer it.

It's a no brained that their affair partners tend to be curvy. Men like curves. Women don't like curves on each other.

Assistant PP here. Maybe you're right. I don't know for sure why the wives often look like dried up husks, but they almost always do. I have assumed that it's because these men think a thin, white woman is who is socially advantageous to be seen with, even as their actual tastes vary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say this as a curvy woman (big boobs/ass, small waist, size 4/6, not fat):

Yes, absolutely. Everything else (clothes, clothing size, weight) equal, a woman with a slim/athletic/boyish build is going to look "higher status" than the same woman with big hips and big breasts. A more athletic body type fits a certain WASPy aesthetic. Curves don't work with that look. Look around: how many curvy women do you see living in the biggest houses, driving the best cars, married to the highest earning men?

Those men's loss.

Perhaps. Or maybe they're attracted to that type of woman.

-1

They marry the bony type to fulfill the image and cheat with curvy women.

This. I have been an assistant in financial services and legal services firms for 30 years. These offices are full of wealthy white men and, almost without exception, these men all have bone-thin, white wives. All the mistresses and flings are curvaceous, sexy, and often of color. The skinny wife is as much for image as the big house is. And she is viewed as a possession, not a valued human being, which is why these men cheat so flagrantly and use every excuse to avoid their wives, while spending a lot of time with their other women.

Rich men have thin wives not because they want a woman with a boy body but because the women are expected to look that way in their circle. The men wouldn't care if their wives gained a few pounds and would actually prefer it.

It's a no brained that their affair partners tend to be curvy. Men like curves. Women don't like curves on each other.

I'm a bi woman and have no time for what other people think is "classy."

If an attractive, smart, kind woman is curvy: hooray!

If an attractive, smart, kind woman is slim: hooray!

As long as I like her and she likes me....who cares what's classy? It's jive for insecure people.

All of this is subjective. I am black and curvy. Nothing short of an eating disorder is getting rid of this ass and these ta-tas. I just roll with it and try to avoid rolls.

I have a couple of black women friends who are naturally very thin and they complained that black men weren't especially interested in them they got more attention from white men so that's who they dated and married.

I have also seen the phenom above where the rich guy is married to the thin white woman but cheating with curvy/shapely women. Not sure if the wife is a trophy and the other women are what he is attracted to OR more open to being side chicks, but for sure he is a cheating piece of trash.

Anonymous wrote:Well only in the sense that clothes tend to hang better on tall, thin women.

It would be hard for Gwen to look bad in anything because she has a great figure and beautiful face and hair.

She looks terrible in everything. Seriously. That woman is not pretty. She's a stick with no figure at all.

You realize that "classy" is determined entirely by historical context, yes?

Classy = thin now only because we live in a society full of abundant empty calories, and only the wealthy have time to invest in exercise.

Two hundred years ago, the opposite was true.

Jesus, there are some empty-brained people on this board. It's like you've never read anything but People.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say this as a curvy woman (big boobs/ass, small waist, size 4/6, not fat):

Yes, absolutely. Everything else (clothes, clothing size, weight) equal, a woman with a slim/athletic/boyish build is going to look "higher status" than the same woman with big hips and big breasts. A more athletic body type fits a certain WASPy aesthetic. Curves don't work with that look. Look around: how many curvy women do you see living in the biggest houses, driving the best cars, married to the highest earning men?

Those men's loss.

Perhaps. Or maybe they're attracted to that type of woman.

-1

They marry the bony type to fulfill the image and cheat with curvy women.

This. I have been an assistant in financial services and legal services firms for 30 years. These offices are full of wealthy white men and, almost without exception, these men all have bone-thin, white wives. All the mistresses and flings are curvaceous, sexy, and often of color. The skinny wife is as much for image as the big house is. And she is viewed as a possession, not a valued human being, which is why these men cheat so flagrantly and use every excuse to avoid their wives, while spending a lot of time with their other women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went up to a D cup after having kids and I hate how it looks. Used to have a really classy look and now I look busty because I'm really small framed. Gross.

umm what did you expect? d cup is big regardless of size.

I don't understand how "classy" is correlated with cup size??? And wtf is "classy look"?

I get what that PP meant about the change of look.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I say this as a curvy woman (big boobs/ass, small waist, size 4/6, not fat):

Yes, absolutely. Everything else (clothes, clothing size, weight) equal, a woman with a slim/athletic/boyish build is going to look "higher status" than the same woman with big hips and big breasts. A more athletic body type fits a certain WASPy aesthetic. Curves don't work with that look. Look around: how many curvy women do you see living in the biggest houses, driving the best cars, married to the highest earning men?

Those men's loss.

Perhaps. Or maybe they're attracted to that type of woman.

+1. I find that women love to tell themselves that "men love curves." But the reality is that most white men seem to prefer very thin women. And having A/B cup breasts and a little "speed bump" butt is not having "no boobs or butt" as larger women like to say. Its feminine, and being thin/slight is feminine, and men like it.

Fixed that for ya—although not even sure it’s most.

Many black and Latino men prefer curves—and by curves, I don’t mean plus size necessarily. You can be petite but curvy.