.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
You are wrong. A kid who figures out how to read by age 3 is exceptional. Assuming (a) kid basically taught herself and (b) parent is accurate about kid being able to read (vs recite text from memory and recognize a few words). This is consistent with a subsequent identification as PG.
I taught myself to read at 3. I am not PG. I'm smart and a quick processor but not even close to PG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No there aren’t 200 kids per grade in FCPS that have IQs > 175.
Wow that would be the highest recorded IQ
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No there aren’t 200 kids per grade in FCPS that have IQs > 175.
Wow that would be the highest recorded IQ
Anonymous wrote:No there aren’t 200 kids per grade in FCPS that have IQs > 175.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
You are wrong. A kid who figures out how to read by age 3 is exceptional. Assuming (a) kid basically taught herself and (b) parent is accurate about kid being able to read (vs recite text from memory and recognize a few words). This is consistent with a subsequent identification as PG.
I think the person you're quoting here is right. I have a 130s IQ and went to Ivy League college. I guess the PG kids had to slum it with the rest of us there but there were not really people there who seemed like they were so much smarter than the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:No there aren’t 200 kids per grade in FCPS that have IQs > 175.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
You are wrong. A kid who figures out how to read by age 3 is exceptional. Assuming (a) kid basically taught herself and (b) parent is accurate about kid being able to read (vs recite text from memory and recognize a few words). This is consistent with a subsequent identification as PG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
You are wrong. A kid who figures out how to read by age 3 is exceptional. Assuming (a) kid basically taught herself and (b) parent is accurate about kid being able to read (vs recite text from memory and recognize a few words). This is consistent with a subsequent identification as PG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many - but certainly not all - gifted children also have a learning disability or ADHD. They might struggle with executive function skills or maintaining sustained focus in non-preferred subjects, so their grades don’t match their standardized test scores.
Well, the Washington area is also filled with successful non LD kids, so it’s not that high a percentage I don’t think.
Several of my friends’ sent their ‘profoundly gifted’ kids to top private schools here and by the end they decided their kid was ‘pretty darned normal’.
Kids who are "profoundly gifted" are in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. It is unlikely that several of your friends had kids in this category.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many - but certainly not all - gifted children also have a learning disability or ADHD. They might struggle with executive function skills or maintaining sustained focus in non-preferred subjects, so their grades don’t match their standardized test scores.
Well, the Washington area is also filled with successful non LD kids, so it’s not that high a percentage I don’t think.
Several of my friends’ sent their ‘profoundly gifted’ kids to top private schools here and by the end they decided their kid was ‘pretty darned normal’.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, moving to a state with an excellent public university system is a great idea if your work lives allow for it. As a pg kid, I really benefited from living in CA, with cheap and easy access to community college and UC classes and libraries from an early age.
Personally, I grew up with what others might call a strong work ethic but it wasn't really school-focused. School was a relatively low bar which I cleared easily and then got on with doing things that interested me. So I’d say I was responsible wrt schoolwork but the Energizer Bunny wrt my own interests/projects.
And what provided that energy was not a work ethic so much as curiosity and a delight in figuring things out. Basically, for a pg kid like me, school was not where most learning happened. Libraries mattered more. In some cases, extra curricular mattered more (speech and debate and math team, for me). Museums mattered. Films mattered. The newspaper mattered. The woods mattered. Even the kitchen mattered.
School is not that interesting, but the world is fascinating. And school can be a useful way of discovering (vs pursuing) interests and playmates/partners in crime (another advantage of living in a college town during MS and HS — it was easy to find kids who loved to read and think and talk and explore).
Ironic thing for me is when I had a kid of my own, I set out to find DC a more challenging school than the ones I attended. Big mistake. DC lost the free time I had and got used to a regime in which obligation, competition, triage, and stress dominated the school environment, and school became mostly where DC learned.
DC excelled in HS, got into a great Uni, and continues to do well in college, but DC’s work/play distinction is much sharper than mine and, as a result, there’s less drive and less joy. If I had to do it all over again, I’d send DC to public school for HS and provide more space and time for a choose your own adventure approach to intellectual life.
Unless you are exceptionally rich, California is one of the worst states to move to if you have a smart kid.
Except for a tiny handful of tye very wealthy areas, California schools are abismal now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
You are wrong. A kid who figures out how to read by age 3 is exceptional. Assuming (a) kid basically taught herself and (b) parent is accurate about kid being able to read (vs recite text from memory and recognize a few words). This is consistent with a subsequent identification as PG.
Anonymous wrote:It's important for you to realize there is nothing unique or remarkable about what you're describing and when she applies to college she will be competing against similarly gifted students for slots.
Anonymous wrote:Check out hoagiesgifted.org for great resources in gifted children, including why grade acceleration is absolutely the best approach in many instances — dcum will nearly never support grade acceleration.
Also I second the Davidson Institute if your child meets their criteria.
I do not think you should be thinking of college at all yet. As many have mentioned, your child’s path will not be straight. Gifted kids often have greater social and emotional needs (you are already seeing anxiety and perfectionism which can be devastating) or learning disabilities (twice exceptional). These things can prove very difficult and you should not jump to the idea that your daughter will get merit aid for college.
My highly gifted kid is currently falling apart in 8th grade because he cannot stay organized and turn in his assignments on time. All tests are 100% but so many 0s on homework because they were late or not turned in. I’m definitely not thinking of merit aid!