Anonymous wrote:
Once again, I know better what is good for others' kids than do their parents. This certainly sounds like a winning argument to me.![]()
Then pardon me when I won't support your demands for a fourth comprehensive high school. Because "I'd rather the community bond $150 million for the next 30 years instead of redraw the boundaries a little to the south" is definitely not a winning argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On another active thread people were complaining that due to overcrowding, there is too much competition for slots in band, sports teams, etc. at W-L and Yorktown. This is another reason why better balancing the SES mix across schools is a good idea--there could be a critical mass at each school of kids who are interested in these sorts of resume-building activities to be able to field competitive teams or robust performing groups, and you wouldn't be forcing every UMC kid in Arlington to compete for the same slots in the same school. Getting the three comprehensive schools to better match the demographics of APS through choice/busing support/boundaries should be a win-win for the kids, if the parents would ever get over themselves.
This is a really good point.
Once again, I know better what is good for others' kids than do their parents. This certainly sounds like a winning argument to me.![]()
Then pardon me when I won't support your demands for a fourth comprehensive high school. Because "I'd rather the community bond $150 million for the next 30 years instead of redraw the boundaries a little to the south" is definitely not a winning argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On another active thread people were complaining that due to overcrowding, there is too much competition for slots in band, sports teams, etc. at W-L and Yorktown. This is another reason why better balancing the SES mix across schools is a good idea--there could be a critical mass at each school of kids who are interested in these sorts of resume-building activities to be able to field competitive teams or robust performing groups, and you wouldn't be forcing every UMC kid in Arlington to compete for the same slots in the same school. Getting the three comprehensive schools to better match the demographics of APS through choice/busing support/boundaries should be a win-win for the kids, if the parents would ever get over themselves.
This is a really good point.
Once again, I know better what is good for others' kids than do their parents. This certainly sounds like a winning argument to me.![]()
Then pardon me when I won't support your demands for a fourth comprehensive high school. Because "I'd rather the community bond $150 million for the next 30 years instead of redraw the boundaries a little to the south" is definitely not a winning argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:):
1) APS puts the same amount per student at all HS but there is an enormous disparity in family ability to contribute whether it is PTA, band booster, etc. This is a huge issue at ever level (ES, MS, HS) and in some cased (see low f/r lunch schools) it is almost as if the parents are building a luxury private school on the bones of the public funding.
.
No fucking clue. You do realize how much Arlington spends per student...
Dp- do you realize how much money some of the North Arlington PTA’s raise?you really don’t have a clue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On another active thread people were complaining that due to overcrowding, there is too much competition for slots in band, sports teams, etc. at W-L and Yorktown. This is another reason why better balancing the SES mix across schools is a good idea--there could be a critical mass at each school of kids who are interested in these sorts of resume-building activities to be able to field competitive teams or robust performing groups, and you wouldn't be forcing every UMC kid in Arlington to compete for the same slots in the same school. Getting the three comprehensive schools to better match the demographics of APS through choice/busing support/boundaries should be a win-win for the kids, if the parents would ever get over themselves.
This is a really good point.
Once again, I know better what is good for others' kids than do their parents. This certainly sounds like a winning argument to me.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Sorry op, but marching band doesn’t have a rich tradition in Ethiopia and El Salvador. You can’t make people share your values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On another active thread people were complaining that due to overcrowding, there is too much competition for slots in band, sports teams, etc. at W-L and Yorktown. This is another reason why better balancing the SES mix across schools is a good idea--there could be a critical mass at each school of kids who are interested in these sorts of resume-building activities to be able to field competitive teams or robust performing groups, and you wouldn't be forcing every UMC kid in Arlington to compete for the same slots in the same school. Getting the three comprehensive schools to better match the demographics of APS through choice/busing support/boundaries should be a win-win for the kids, if the parents would ever get over themselves.
This is a really good point.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe it is a smaller band because fewer people in Wakefield are interested?
Anonymous wrote:On another active thread people were complaining that due to overcrowding, there is too much competition for slots in band, sports teams, etc. at W-L and Yorktown. This is another reason why better balancing the SES mix across schools is a good idea--there could be a critical mass at each school of kids who are interested in these sorts of resume-building activities to be able to field competitive teams or robust performing groups, and you wouldn't be forcing every UMC kid in Arlington to compete for the same slots in the same school. Getting the three comprehensive schools to better match the demographics of APS through choice/busing support/boundaries should be a win-win for the kids, if the parents would ever get over themselves.
Anonymous wrote:
Shush, PP, you’re not supposed to point out the hypocrisy of Arlington liberal democrats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:):
1) APS puts the same amount per student at all HS but there is an enormous disparity in family ability to contribute whether it is PTA, band booster, etc. This is a huge issue at ever level (ES, MS, HS) and in some cased (see low f/r lunch schools) it is almost as if the parents are building a luxury private school on the bones of the public funding.
.
No fucking clue. You do realize how much Arlington spends per student...
Dp- do you realize how much money some of the North Arlington PTA’s raise?you really don’t have a clue.
Who cares how much some of the NA PTAs raise? It has no impact on students at other schools.
Not the PP, but I think you are pointing to a large part of the problem: opportunity hoarding. The other big issue I have with school segregation is that racism and bigotry are more likely to go unchecked in less diverse schools, and that's an ongoing problem for us all. Well, those of us who think Donald Trump lacks empathy and human decency anyway.
Yes, but hardly anyone voted for Trump in Arlington. Chances are, most of the alleged opportunity hoarders are liberal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:):
1) APS puts the same amount per student at all HS but there is an enormous disparity in family ability to contribute whether it is PTA, band booster, etc. This is a huge issue at ever level (ES, MS, HS) and in some cased (see low f/r lunch schools) it is almost as if the parents are building a luxury private school on the bones of the public funding.
.
No fucking clue. You do realize how much Arlington spends per student...
Dp- do you realize how much money some of the North Arlington PTA’s raise?you really don’t have a clue.
Who cares how much some of the NA PTAs raise? It has no impact on students at other schools.
Not the PP, but I think you are pointing to a large part of the problem: opportunity hoarding. The other big issue I have with school segregation is that racism and bigotry are more likely to go unchecked in less diverse schools, and that's an ongoing problem for us all. Well, those of us who think Donald Trump lacks empathy and human decency anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:):
1) APS puts the same amount per student at all HS but there is an enormous disparity in family ability to contribute whether it is PTA, band booster, etc. This is a huge issue at ever level (ES, MS, HS) and in some cased (see low f/r lunch schools) it is almost as if the parents are building a luxury private school on the bones of the public funding.
.
No fucking clue. You do realize how much Arlington spends per student...
Dp- do you realize how much money some of the North Arlington PTA’s raise?you really don’t have a clue.
Who cares how much some of the NA PTAs raise? It has no impact on students at other schools.