Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, HRC says that we should believe ALL women who say they were raped.
But then again, she's a bonifide pathological liar.
Anonymous wrote:But, HRC says that we should believe ALL women who say they were raped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.
If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).
It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.
She was unappealing because of sexism. People are less likely to like strong women.
Psst: She was unappealing because Clinton is NOT a strong woman. She can't do anything on her own. She is the very sort of woman who would obey her husband's command to vote a certain way.
I'm a former R, and did not ever support the Clintons. I voted for both Bushes, but one thing I would never say about HRC is that she is a weak woman. No, she is a very strong woman, and though I may not agree with her, that is one thing I have often admired about her.. how tenacious she is. Even Trump admitted to that.
-signed a woman
Well, she fiercely defended her rapist husband so there's that.
She's strong - not ethics - but "strong" I suppose
If a woman accused your DH of rape, I'm going to assume that you love him so you would fiercely defend him. That doesn't make her "weak".
Yes it does. And a fool as well. Thank god she lost.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing makes a white woman more conservative than having a white son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it's OK to blame women for HRC's loss, but you can't blame HRC herself, because that would be sexist.
Wow, gotta give the libs credit for thinking out of the box.....
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:You Trumpkins think men should rule everything. Poor dears...stupid...please go to college
You're husband is a beta male and you have no respect for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.
If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).
It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.
She was unappealing because of sexism. People are less likely to like strong women.
Psst: She was unappealing because Clinton is NOT a strong woman. She can't do anything on her own. She is the very sort of woman who would obey her husband's command to vote a certain way.
I'm a former R, and did not ever support the Clintons. I voted for both Bushes, but one thing I would never say about HRC is that she is a weak woman. No, she is a very strong woman, and though I may not agree with her, that is one thing I have often admired about her.. how tenacious she is. Even Trump admitted to that.
-signed a woman
Well, she fiercely defended her rapist husband so there's that.
She's strong - not ethics - but "strong" I suppose
If a woman accused your DH of rape, I'm going to assume that you love him so you would fiercely defend him. That doesn't make her "weak".
Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.
If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).
It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.
Anonymous wrote:I graduated from law school so of course I voted for HIllary and got my husband to as well.
I hate there are so many dumb whites
Anonymous wrote:I graduated from law school so of course I voted for HIllary and got my husband to as well.
I hate there are so many dumb whites
Anonymous wrote:Hey libs, I would like to continue this discussion, but I need to fix myself breakfast. Excuse me while I call my husband to ask him what I should eat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a white married woman in her 50's and many of my friends are similar. None of us voted for Trump.
Unless you were in the voting booth with them, you don't know how they voted,but I can see why your friends might have lied to you, you arrogant sack.