Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh, as the mom of a young 5 year old who we are starting in school at the appropriate time, I am SO SICK OF REDSHIRTERS. It started in pre-K -- there were enough kids redshirted that my child's preK-4 class was literally 50% 5 year olds who had already been through that class before. They were really disruptive and I can just see it getting worse in late elementary/early middle school, for example when their hormones hit super early compared to the rest of the class. Just awful. Start your kids on time.
This was my experience, too. In a k class at a religious school, 8 out of 19 kids were red shirted (mostly boys). My child with a January birthday seemed younger, smaller and academically behind. The older kids were more boisterous and, because there were so many of them, typical kindergarteners didn't fit in. These kids dominated PE and recess and the younger kids were pushed around.
We had this experience last year in PRE-K!! The 5 year olds were definitely ready for K, and too old to still be in preschool, yet their parents held them back. It was a 15 kid class, we knew the kids, we knew their parents. We knew they would have been fine in K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This actually pisses me off as the parent of an August baby that you think putting a kid a year and a half older in her grade (without diagnosed special needs) is acceptable.
WHY? I have a September child and could not care less kids are that much older. I wanted my kid the youngest vs. oldest. If my kid can hold their own with kids that much older, especially academic, I'm very proud of him.
It's not about you and what you are proud of, it's about your child. And it's about having 20 year olds in high school with 13/14 year old freshmen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really think people should get a doctor's note to redshirt. They are doing this in CA now.
+1 Totally agree.
Anonymous wrote:I really think people should get a doctor's note to redshirt. They are doing this in CA now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I am not a fan of red shirting, I do think it's funny that people are calling your boy born in March too old to redshirt when most people on dcum would defend the right of a boy born 3 months later to be redshirted.
Everyone send your kids on time and we'll all have nice, one year cohorts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This actually pisses me off as the parent of an August baby that you think putting a kid a year and a half older in her grade (without diagnosed special needs) is acceptable.
WHY? I have a September child and could not care less kids are that much older. I wanted my kid the youngest vs. oldest. If my kid can hold their own with kids that much older, especially academic, I'm very proud of him.
It's not about you and what you are proud of, it's about your child. And it's about having 20 year olds in high school with 13/14 year old freshmen.
A kid with a March birthday, who started kindergarten at 6 instead of 5, will graduate from high school having just turned 19. So no, it's not about that.
DP, but March to June isn't "just" and I went on time and turned 19 as a *sophomore* in college.
I don't like the rules, but the rules in the DMV area seem to be you can hold your kid back for a whole year if you choose.
OK. The kid will graduate from high school at 19 years and 2 months. Which is 10 months (5/6 of a year) less than 20 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh, as the mom of a young 5 year old who we are starting in school at the appropriate time, I am SO SICK OF REDSHIRTERS. It started in pre-K -- there were enough kids redshirted that my child's preK-4 class was literally 50% 5 year olds who had already been through that class before. They were really disruptive and I can just see it getting worse in late elementary/early middle school, for example when their hormones hit super early compared to the rest of the class. Just awful. Start your kids on time.
This was my experience, too. In a k class at a religious school, 8 out of 19 kids were red shirted (mostly boys). My child with a January birthday seemed younger, smaller and academically behind. The older kids were more boisterous and, because there were so many of them, typical kindergarteners didn't fit in. These kids dominated PE and recess and the younger kids were pushed around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This actually pisses me off as the parent of an August baby that you think putting a kid a year and a half older in her grade (without diagnosed special needs) is acceptable.
WHY? I have a September child and could not care less kids are that much older. I wanted my kid the youngest vs. oldest. If my kid can hold their own with kids that much older, especially academic, I'm very proud of him.
It's not about you and what you are proud of, it's about your child. And it's about having 20 year olds in high school with 13/14 year old freshmen.
A kid with a March birthday, who started kindergarten at 6 instead of 5, will graduate from high school having just turned 19. So no, it's not about that.